Quote from: HistoryMemo on December 23, 2025, 05:21:45 AMIndeed, and also in your group. Almost 43 years and counting.Quote from: Slim on December 09, 2025, 09:40:26 PMQuote from: biomed441 on December 08, 2025, 05:16:22 PMOr, for those members who are AF Warrant officers and also members of CAP, which if I recall a few of the first graduates of the new warrant program are CAP members. Would CAP Match their grade or require they progress through the CAP Officer program instead.One of those new WOs is a member of my wing, is currently a CAP SMSgt, our wing NCO advisor and IT director. Unless/until CAP brings back warrant grades, he has no intention of changing that status.
I could see an instance where WOs might come back into CAP and be useful, but that is highly unlikely to happen, and I'm not really a proponent of it. Just a passing thought I had while discussing some CP related items with a few others (sitting around trying to solve all of CAP's problems).
Otherwise, since we're all expected to be technical experts in one or more areas, with increasing levels of education, training and responsibilities, I really don't see much of a need for WOs in CAP.
Fellow member of MIWG I see...
Quote from: Slim on December 09, 2025, 09:40:26 PMQuote from: biomed441 on December 08, 2025, 05:16:22 PMOr, for those members who are AF Warrant officers and also members of CAP, which if I recall a few of the first graduates of the new warrant program are CAP members. Would CAP Match their grade or require they progress through the CAP Officer program instead.One of those new WOs is a member of my wing, is currently a CAP SMSgt, our wing NCO advisor and IT director. Unless/until CAP brings back warrant grades, he has no intention of changing that status.
I could see an instance where WOs might come back into CAP and be useful, but that is highly unlikely to happen, and I'm not really a proponent of it. Just a passing thought I had while discussing some CP related items with a few others (sitting around trying to solve all of CAP's problems).
Otherwise, since we're all expected to be technical experts in one or more areas, with increasing levels of education, training and responsibilities, I really don't see much of a need for WOs in CAP.
Quote from: Shuman 14 on December 14, 2025, 04:21:59 PMPersonally I think all CAP Senior Members should be Warrant Officers...
[elided]
No NCO ranks and all Officer Ranks become temporary assignment so while you are the Squadron Commander you wear Captain's Bars, when your tour of duty is over, back to Warrant Officer you go.
[elided]
QuoteWhy even make them Warrant Officers? Just make everyone a Senior Member without Grade. You accept a position that has a rank tied to it then you wear that grade but as soon as your term is over back to SM.
Quote from: Shuman 14 on December 14, 2025, 04:21:59 PMPersonally I think all CAP Senior Members should be Warrant Officers...
Senior Member Without Grade = CAP WO Candidate
Level 1 complete = CAP WO-1
Level 2 complete = CAP CWO-2
Level 3 complete = CAP CWO-3
Level 4 complete = CAP CWO-4
Level 5 complete = CAP CWO-5
No NCO ranks and all Officer Ranks become temporary assignment so while you are the Squadron Commander you wear Captain's Bars, when your tour of duty is over, back to Warrant Officer you go.
I can maybe see a way that successful CAP members could keep their appointed rank as a reward for a job well done and I can also see a grandfather clause for all current CAP member with rank, so not to strip anyone of rank they earned.
It would solve the perceived problem of Rank in CAP.
I would also recommend that we make the Rank Insignia a different color than the USAF Warrant Officer Insignia, Maybe make the the little squares Grey instead of Sky Blue.
Page created in 0.109 seconds with 15 queries.