Does CAP do SAR?

Started by RiverAux, May 10, 2009, 07:59:33 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Do you believe that CAP as an organization provides search and rescue services?

Yes
47 (74.6%)
No
16 (25.4%)

Total Members Voted: 63

RiverAux

More and more we are seeing the contention on this board that CAP does not actually provide search and rescue services because we don't provide advanced medical care.  I think most of us think this is absurd and am putting this in poll form because I am confident that this will demonstrate that this is the majority view. 

But, lets be clear that I am saying that the average person would say that CAP provides search and rescue services once they learn what we actually do.  It is entirely possible that there may be legal definitions in various state or federal laws under which CAP may not qualify as providing SAR.  But, those are fairly technical arguments and don't really matter much in the overall scheme of things since the purpose of these laws vary so the definitions will vary as well.

So, here is my reasoning for why I think CAP provides SAR services.

1.  It is without dispute that CAP searches for people.  And it is without dispute that CAP actually does end up rescuing people, sometimes those in extreme distress.  To rescue someone doesn't always require the sort of advanced medical care that we don't provide.  First Aid/CPR can save lives.  Hauling someone out of the woods on a litter can save their life.  Is it common that CAP finds and rescues someone?  No, not really.  I only personally know a few members credited with saves, only one of which would definetely be called a rescue by 100% of people.  But, that is what we train and prepare for. 

2.  About a bajillion CAP regulations use the term "search and rescue" to describe what we do.  There are so many of them, including various task guides and reference texts that no citation is necessary.  CAP as an organization clearly believes that we do SAR.  However, since the folks that think CAP doesn't do SAR probably don't think CAP is credible anyway, I'll go on.

3.  The Air Force certainly believes we do SAR.  They direct our missions from the Air Force RESCUE Coordination Center after all.  The AFRCC includes CAP in its list of SAR links.  CAP members are eligible to go to the National Search and Rescue School.  AFI 10-2701 has numerous references to using CAP for search and rescue. 

4.  Congress thinks we do SAR.  Although none of the federal legislation regarding CAP specifically mentions SAR (it uses more generic language for ES), there is other evidence.  For example, Senate Resolution 132 from 2007 says, in part:
QuoteWhereas since 1942 the Civil Air Patrol has flown more than 1,000,000 hours of search and rescue missions, saving several thousand lives; and ...
.  There are similar bills on previous CAP annivesaries).  Heck, we've been telling them that we do SAR for years in our annual reports. 

5.  The National Association for Search and Rescue must think we have something to do with SAR as you can find us in their web link section

6.  The Department of Homeland Security thinks we do SAR or why else would they say so as part of their online training on the ESF SAR function?    http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/IS809.asp

7. Furthermore our air and ground teams very clearly met the criteria to be called SAR teams in the draft NIMS-typing document.  We wouldn't be the most advanced teams, but thats beside the point.

8.  Sure, CAP does not provide the highest possible level of training for our ground teams.  But, because we don't provide everything, does that preclude us from saving lives?  Would you say that a cave rescue team doesn't do SAR because they don't do swiftware rescue?  Would you say that a guy trained in rope climbing skills doesn't do SAR because he is not an EMT even though he get injured people off cliffs? 

When it comes right down to it we fill two niches in the SAR world -- Aerial search using fixed wing aircraft and teams trained in wilderness search and rescue with basic first aid capabilities.  We can and do rescue people while staying in that niche. 




PHall

Simple answer to your question, no, we do not do Search and Rescue, we do Search and Locate. Somebody else usually does the actual rescue/recovery of the victims these days.

We may have done true SAR where we actually did the rescue/recovery years ago, but with the advent of the EMS we basically are in "we find it, they recover it" business.

And for those who ask "what about all the "saves" we get every year?"
If you check, you will find that few, if any, were actually rescued/recovered by CAP.
We just located them.



Eclipse

Dude - its a beautiful Sunny Sunday.

Isn't there anything better you could be doing with your time then writing stuff like this?
(present company included)

Whether the answer is yes or no, makes no difference to anyone here or anywhere else.  We are what we are.


"That Others May Zoom"

BrandonKea

Quote from: Eclipse on May 10, 2009, 08:22:38 PM
Dude - its a beautiful Sunny Sunday.

Isn't there anything better you could be doing with your time then writing stuff like this?
(present company included)

Whether the answer is yes or no, makes no difference to anyone here or anywhere else.  We are what we are.

Can we cut and paste that on like 75% of the topics here, lol.
Brandon Kea, Capt, CAP

N Harmon

Is a swift water rescue team who has not responded to a swift water rescue in some years yet still practices and maintains certification for it...somehow no longer a swift water rescue team?

Civil Air Patrol does Search and Rescue. That we have been called upon less to do it is irrelevant.
NATHAN A. HARMON, Capt, CAP
Monroe Composite Squadron

RiverAux

QuoteDude - its a beautiful Sunny Sunday.
Unfortunately not where I'm at or I would be out mowing the grass. 

AlaskanCFI

Of course there are some of us who still fly tail-wheel, ski and floats into the bush.
Thus allowing us to land at or near those in need of assistance.   There is nothing like the sound of a big radial engine mounted on a DH2 Beaver to make a stranded snowmachiner, pilot or mariner feel a lot better.

It's sunny and 45 degrees here, so I am off to refinish the bottoms of my floats.
Major, Squadron Commander Stan-Eval..Instructor Pilot- Alaska Wing CAP
Retired Alaska Air Guard
Retired State of Alaska Law Dawg, Retired Vol Firefighter and EMT
Ex-Navy, Ex-Army,
Firearms Instructor
Alaskan Tailwheel and Floatplane CFI
http://www.floatplanealaska.com

FW

Quote from: RiverAux on May 10, 2009, 09:16:00 PM
QuoteDude - its a beautiful Sunny Sunday.
Unfortunately not where I'm at or I would be out mowing the grass.

Just put the Harley away this fine Sunday.   I was searching for the perfect burger, located it then, rescued my thirst with a (root)beer after the burger was taken care of. ;D

Yes, the perfect CAP(er) SAR mission ;)

Short Field

The USAF, through the National Search and Resuce School, teaches the Inland Search and Rescue Planning Course.  It is all about Search and has no sections that cover moving people once they are found.  However, if you can't find them, you can't rescue them.  Providing the location of the people in distress and getting someone there to pick them up is as much a part of Rescue as cutting them out of a burning wreck.
SAR/DR MP, ARCHOP, AOBD, GTM1, GBD, LSC, FASC, LO, PIO, MSO(T), & IC2
Wilson #2640

lordmonar

It is called team work.

No one person can do the job.
PATRICK M. HARRIS, SMSgt, CAP

maverik

Very true and if SAR meant pulling people from burning planes etc. then the Ohio Valley Search team wouldn't be SAR.
KC9SFU
Fresh from the Mint C/LT
"Hard pressed on my right. My center is yielding. Impossible to maneuver. Situation excellent. I am attacking." Ferdinand Foch at the Battle of the Marne

whatevah

Quote from: SARADDICT on May 11, 2009, 12:43:51 AM
Very true and if SAR meant pulling people from burning planes etc. then the Ohio Valley Search team wouldn't be SAR.
Then apparently they aren't SAR.  Direct quote from their website....
QuoteThis is a civilian wilderness non-profit organization  who provide well-trained dogs, handlers and support personnel to search for and rescue lost or missing persons within a hundred-mile radius of Evansville, Indiana.
QuoteThe purpose of this training is to provide skilled and knowledgeable personnel and trained canines to assist in locating:
    * 1) Lost or missing persons in wilderness or urban areas
    * 2) Survivors trapped in a collapsed buildings or disaster areas
    * 3) Drowned subjects
    * 4) Deceased persons (cadaver search)

Their thing is missing person searches, not plane crashes that CAP says we do.  Their members only have first aid and CPR training, too.  Just like us.   Although, they've done more searches this year than my wing has had actual downed planes in over 10 years. The last legit search mission my ground team was called to assist with was 4 years ago, 40 miles into another wing.  Fatal helicopter crash, ELT wasn't turned on. Crashed in a forest less than 100 yards from a major highway, but nobody saw him go down.


To answer the main question... "Sometimes".  99% of the time, no. Maybe the specialty teams trained in severe terrain.  Really, the only reason we even require first aid training is to take care of our own members who get injured while searching.  We don't teach patient packaging, use of c-collars and other spinal immobilization stuff, etc.  Sure, we may have a stretcher and straps but unless there is a First Responder or EMT on the team, I bet nobody knows how to correctly do it.
Jerry Horn
CAPTalk Co-Admin

Short Field

Duh.  If a person is lost and you find them - they have just been rescued.
SAR/DR MP, ARCHOP, AOBD, GTM1, GBD, LSC, FASC, LO, PIO, MSO(T), & IC2
Wilson #2640

SJFedor

Quote from: Short Field on May 11, 2009, 05:00:35 AM
Duh.  If a person is lost and you find them - they have just been rescued.

I'd have to beg to differ on that one. Assuming you find them and can say "oh, the trail is over there" or "follow us to the road and we'll give you a ride to the ranger station" then, yes, you find them, they've been rescued. But let's say you find them after a 100ft fall down a hill, or pinned between two rocks. We found them, but they've still got a ways to go before they're rescued.

Again, I don't have statistics, but I'd be willing to bet that a decent amount of missing person searches are due to either medical reasons (the alzheimers patient) or injury (the hiker that fell down the hill and is overdue). Not too many people are just plain lost.

Steven Fedor, NREMT-P
Master Ambulance Driver
Former Capt, MP, MCPE, MO, MS, GTL, and various other 3-and-4 letter combinations
NESA MAS Instructor, 2008-2010 (#479)

wingnut55

NOW THIS IS A  STUPID SUBJECT?

CAN YOU SAY i SIT AROUND WITH NOTHING TO DO??

Gunner C


sarmed1

I have to say no on this one; some units or some areas of the country do participate in all aspects of SAR, but I dont believe that is universal to the entire country.  As a number of people here have pointed out we are very lacking on the rescue part of search and rescue. 
Even with limitations on "medical care" this is an area many units shy away from.  I have seen numerous non CAP search and rescue units (PA specifically) that do no "EMS" level care as part of thier SAR mission (here in PA youmust be a licensed EMS service to provide ALS or BLS care, and that is usually limited to those actually operating an ambulance)  So that is a non starter on why?  Honeslty the biggest reason I hear is varitions on a theme but it centers around the lack of calls (which are related to the lack of rapid response ability)  ie why train for the SAR mission that no one calls us for when we can be proffecient at the one that we do get called for (ie missing person search vs false activated ELT's)
There is a big differance in training for a mission you dont get called for and not training for a mission that you dont get called for, yet let people believe you do.

mk
Capt.  Mark "K12" Kleibscheidel

Pingree1492

Quote from: SJFedor on May 11, 2009, 07:05:11 AM
Again, I don't have statistics, but I'd be willing to bet that a decent amount of missing person searches are due to either medical reasons (the alzheimers patient) or injury (the hiker that fell down the hill and is overdue). Not too many people are just plain lost.

Don't be so quick on that assumption.  People do simply get lost while hiking fairly often in states with decent mountains in them (had a handful of those type of searches last summer).  Is typically flat-landers coming up into the mountains for a day or weekend camping trip, and end up getting lost or confused.  Mountains and valleys can be very confusing and look all the same if you're not familiar with navigating in them, plus most people don't take the time to stop periodically on the trail and memorize what it looks like coming down, as I can guarantee that it looks different than the view going up!

As had been said before, whether or not CAP participates in a lot of SAR or not depends on many factors, policies and politics within your state, terrain in the state, amount of tourists coming into state, amount of air traffic, relationships with the local Sheriff, SAR organizations, etc, etc.  We are expecting a lot of missions this summer, many areas won't get any.
On CAP Hiatus- the U.S. Army is kindly letting me play with some of their really cool toys (helicopters) in far off, distant lands  :)

Short Field

We have had several "Finds" in the last year where the person had gotten totally lost (93 year old in a RV - even had cell phone contact but he had no clue where he was), or had a mechanical break-down that left them stranded in the back-country.  We even had one where our ground team found the person with a broken leg, stablized him, then carried the person out to an area where a medivac chopper could pick them up.  I would call all of the "Finds" a resuce, even if all we did was vector the local country police to the site.

SAR/DR MP, ARCHOP, AOBD, GTM1, GBD, LSC, FASC, LO, PIO, MSO(T), & IC2
Wilson #2640

Al Sayre

I'd have to call the Dennis Steinbock mission a rescue as well...
Lt Col Al Sayre
MS Wing Staff Dude
Admiral, Great Navy of the State of Nebraska
GRW #2787