November 29, 2020, 01:28:19 am

CAP historical repositories

Started by RiverAux, December 31, 2017, 12:57:19 pm

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RiverAux

CAPR 210-3 basically requires that CAP retain ownership of all its histories records and that they be kept in a "repository" at some level of CAP. 

Is this really the wisest course? I am all sure that many of us are aware of situations where a new unit commander or staff officer decided to clean things up a bit and trashed material that most certainly would meet the definition of something of historical interest that should have been retained. 

The fact is that CAP as an organization just can't be trusted to maintain historical records, photographs, etc. because in general we just don't have the space to properly keep them, even often at Wing level. 

Rather than risk that the new guy will junk everything, why not encourage CAP historians to develop relationships with statewide archives (because I don't trust county museums much either) and have them put them there.  Not only will it ensure that they are going to be kept in a proper environment, but they will also be available for use by other historians and encourage more scholarship about CAP? 

Of course, the fact is that we are unlikely to be producing much of new historical significance these days.  The only interesting documents that we may produce are related to missions and most of that is required to be tossed.  If we had a standard practice of writing after action reports for major missions, those would be perfect for such purposes, but that isn't being done to my knowledge.  CAP newsletters (the first draft of history) are basically dead.  Moving forward, about the only thing we may have to put in repositories are copies of press releases (if anyone bothers to write them) and a few printed out photos (if anyone bothers to do that anymore). 

But, there is some older stuff out there that should be kept and we shouldn't be the ones keeping it. 

etodd

Quote1.10.1. Unit records not covered by permanent retention criteria but which the commander determines to be of significant historical value will be forwarded to the unit historian for evaluation.


That is way too broad, to the point of being useless.  One Commander may say very little is needed, while another may want 5000 photos taken at an encampment or SAREX to be archived.
MS - MO - AP - MP - FRO - ESO

sUAS MP - sUAS Instructor - sUAS Check Pilot

Eclipse

Quote from: RiverAux on December 31, 2017, 12:57:19 pm
But, there is some older stuff out there that should be kept and we shouldn't be the ones keeping it.


Why?

Where?

A lot of units don't have formal storage, and many Wing HQ's look like unit meeting locations.



RiverAux

Quote from: Eclipse on December 31, 2017, 05:53:28 pm
Quote from: RiverAux on December 31, 2017, 12:57:19 pm
But, there is some older stuff out there that should be kept and we shouldn't be the ones keeping it.


Why?

Where?

A lot of units don't have formal storage, and many Wing HQ's look like unit meeting locations.


Exactly what I said in the rest of the post...  ;)

Mitchell 1969

Why in the world does CAP want historical suppositories?

Let me get my glasses...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________
Bernard J. Wilson, Major, CAP

Mitchell 1969; Earhart 1971; Eaker 1973. Cadet Flying Encampment, License, 1970. IACE New Zealand 1971; IACE Korea 1973.

CAP has been bery, bery good to me.

RRLE