The back should read, "The owner of this coin is entitled to wear the SMoV for any of the following actions: directing traffic, stubbing a toe, entertaining 'he who shall not be named', etc."
It's hard to believe 10 years has gone by since this "mishigash" transpired. At least we can laugh about it now...
Quote from: FW on January 29, 2016, 03:11:10 AMIt's hard to believe 10 years has gone by since this "mishigash" transpired. At least we can laugh about it now...And its hard to believe that it was 8-9 years before that we were warned "This guy is trouble, watch out!"
^ I don't think violating our Core Values warrant a stay-cation at Leavenworth or disqualification of retirement benefits, however it does make for good satire once in a while...
Quote from: FW on January 29, 2016, 01:59:32 PM^ I don't think violating our Core Values warrant a stay-cation at Leavenworth or disqualification of retirement benefits, however it does make for good satire once in a while... I'm talking about the multiple counts of test compromise that he somehow never was charged with.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
Quote from: PHall on January 29, 2016, 03:51:55 PMQuote from: FW on January 29, 2016, 01:59:32 PM^ I don't think violating our Core Values warrant a stay-cation at Leavenworth or disqualification of retirement benefits, however it does make for good satire once in a while... I'm talking about the multiple counts of test compromise that he somehow never was charged with.The guy who took that flak was the guy who took the test.
If that guy knew some members still discuss him, he would be laughing and enjoying himself!