Started by DNall, January 05, 2007, 04:40:03 am
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ricwalters on January 06, 2007, 03:28:23 am...I don't want to be tied to the ANG as a red-headed stepchild. Despite the great relationship we have with them here in Houston, I cannot imagine that to be the case everywhere else.
Quote from: DrJbdm...it boils down it seems to who has main control over us, NGB or 1st AF. I know we are currently under AETC, and while that may make some sense for the AE or CP programs, it makes no sense for our operational programs (ES/DR) but neither AE/CP is the main focus of CAP nor should they be. Our main focus is ES/DR or at least it should be.
QuoteIt's why we were founded
Quote from: RiverAux on January 06, 2007, 04:36:04 amQuoteIt's why we were foundedWell, really they formed CAP as a civil defense (i.e., emergency services) organization. Only later did they get into cadet programs/AE. I would be surprised if you find any real external AE mandate until the corporation itself was formed after the war.
Quote from: ELTHunter on January 06, 2007, 03:35:11 amCan anyone outline the CAP structure as it was initially, and then in the 50's through the 1999 change? My history only goes back to 1998/9. It would be nice to understand the organizational history and what was right and wrong.
QuoteThe corporate structure was established so that CAP would not only be a permanent fixture (We were the only military auxiliary to see actual combat, and the only military auxiliary from World War II that survived beyond the early Cold War.
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 23 queries.