SCWG CAP-USAF SAREVAL

Started by Brad, April 27, 2008, 02:17:28 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

calguy

Quote from: flynd94 on April 28, 2008, 12:34:26 AM
Quote from: wingnut on April 27, 2008, 06:29:06 AM
SCWG CAP-USAF SAREVAL, "Overall grade of Marginal"

CAWG came out the same way, well are we not sharp. PAWG, shut down, marginals in some major Wings, I could report on some other issues but not here. I think we need a Lube Job. Or maybe we are slipping a little too much.

And we know why we got a Marginal at the SAREVAL.  Why won't you let the good folks know how the AF Monitored SAREX went a couple of months ago.  If I am correct CAWG did a bang up job.  Wonder if it has anything to do with that the SAREX was run by different players, who actually know what they are doing.  It was the first time in a long time that the SAREX was based in NorCAL.  JMHO

PS-  I know many on the staff there got coins (for their superior performance)  from the AF Liaison's that were observing.  These are the same AF personnel that saw the debacle we called a SAREval last year
The last SAREVAL was in central California and they have folks that know what they were doing.   This year the IMU was not used by the IC and DDO because he had no idea how to make it work and didn't want to get dinged.   How was that a success?  They made it work down south just fine.  They ran the south ops with just 3 or 4 command staff and were told by the USAFR that they would have had an outstanding and the south ops ran most of the missions.  The guys down south and central arn't just a bunch of idiots.  Funny, IM has been used on missions for years down south, I am surprised you have just started to use it now up north.

wingnut

I am sorry my bad,

???hey did you just see the emperor? he has no clothes !! :clap: