CAP Talk

Cadet Programs => Cadet Programs Management & Activities => Topic started by: JArvey on May 31, 2011, 09:34:39 PM

Title: PDA
Post by: JArvey on May 31, 2011, 09:34:39 PM
My friend was wondering about the exact regs for PDA. Anyone know all the regs on this?
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: MIKE on May 31, 2011, 09:41:17 PM
Quote from: CAPR 52-162-3. a. Decorum. Cadets will conduct themselves in a professional and appropriate manner at all times while at CAP meetings or activities. Cadets will not engage in inappropriate touching or public displays of affection by kissing, hugging or holding hands (or similar conduct) while in uniform.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: JArvey on May 31, 2011, 10:19:15 PM
thats in 52-16?
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Ned on May 31, 2011, 10:31:00 PM
I thought it was particularly well-written.   8)
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on May 31, 2011, 10:57:53 PM
Quote from: Ned on May 31, 2011, 10:31:00 PM
I thought it was particularly well-written.   8)

I agree. However, from time to time people do have a quick hug. Leaving an encampment is one of the times I've seen it happen. According to the policy, as written, that's something cadets should not do. I don't quite agree with it, but I can see the potential PITAs that can formulate. Part of our "kid gloves" society I guess.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: lordmonar on May 31, 2011, 11:30:09 PM
The cool thing about being a leader....is that we enforce rules when they need to be....and ignore them when it is in the best interest of CAP.

If the rules were always black and white...we would not need leaders.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on May 31, 2011, 11:33:01 PM
Quote from: lordmonar on May 31, 2011, 11:30:09 PM
The cool thing about being a leader....is that we enforce rules when they need to be....and ignore them when it is in the best interest of CAP.

If the rules were always black and white...we would not need leaders.

Still need them to make the rules. :P

But in all seriousness, as a cadet, the absolute statement was somewhat odd. Now as someone older, and as someone who never cared for hugs, I can see the can of worms that can arise from something as simple as a hug.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 12:08:03 AM
well its that hug after encampment that have made me and my gf start dating, and are these the only regs for PDA?
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: davidsinn on June 01, 2011, 01:38:19 AM
Quote from: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 12:08:03 AM
well its that hug after encampment that have made me and my gf start dating, and are these the only regs for PDA?

Respect on display as well
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: EMT-83 on June 01, 2011, 02:21:26 AM
Quote from: lordmonar on May 31, 2011, 11:30:09 PM
The cool thing about being a leader....is that we enforce rules when they need to be....and ignore them when it is in the best interest of CAP.

If the rules were always black and white...we would not need leaders.

I don't see it as ignoring the rule, but making a determination as to what's appropriate, just like it says in the regulation.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Ned on June 01, 2011, 04:28:54 AM
Quote from: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 12:08:03 AM
[A]re these the only regs for PDA?

There is more on fraternization . . .

The 52-16 is a good read.  You should try it.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Eclipse on June 01, 2011, 02:04:51 PM
There is a world of difference between a goodbye hug, or even one of appreciation or sentiment between peers, and walking formation holding hands in uniform, or any of the other 12 ridiculous things many of us have seen.  I hugged a number of people this year when I was being voted off the island at encampment, hardly inappropriate.

I make no bones about the fact tat I think any dating or similar relationships in CAP, especially those involving cadets,  are inappropriate and should be discouraged, but with that said, the verbiage about PDA is there to insure we present a professional image, respect the uniform, and teach our members about proper public decorum, not deny our humanity.

I always find it interesting, though, the natural predisposition of people, when told "you can't do that", to immediately look for the most extreme loophole
to reply "yes, I can."
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: jks19714 on June 01, 2011, 02:15:10 PM
There might be a market for a specialized form of taser -- one prong in each cadet.   ::)
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 01, 2011, 02:04:51 PM
I hugged a number of people this year when I was being voted off the island at encampment, hardly in appropriate.

Voted off the island?
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Eclipse on June 01, 2011, 02:52:34 PM
Quote from: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 01, 2011, 02:04:51 PM
I hugged a number of people this year when I was being voted off the island at encampment, hardly in appropriate.

Voted off the island?

I have been on executive staff for 10 years, commanding it for the last eight, and thought is was time for a new guy to run things and was relieved of duty
at the end of graduation.

Lots of hugs.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on June 01, 2011, 02:55:21 PM
Quote from: JArvey on June 01, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 01, 2011, 02:04:51 PM
I hugged a number of people this year when I was being voted off the island at encampment, hardly in appropriate.

Voted off the island?

Eclipse has been a "regular" at this particular encampment for 10 years, with most of those as the Encampment Commander. This year was his last.


I'm always late to the party...
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: N Harmon on June 01, 2011, 04:46:59 PM
Are our PDA standards more or less strict than the RM?
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: PHall on June 01, 2011, 05:05:03 PM
Quote from: N Harmon on June 01, 2011, 04:46:59 PM
Are our PDA standards more or less strict than the RM?

They're pretty much the same as what the Air Force has. Can't really speak for the other services though.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: SarDragon on June 01, 2011, 07:48:36 PM
It seems like they match pretty much across the board.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on June 01, 2011, 07:53:07 PM
Quote from: SarDragon on June 01, 2011, 07:48:36 PM
It seems like they match pretty much across the board.

^+1.

I've seen Military personnel hug. I've seen CAP personnel hug.

While the regulation makes it seem like a blanket ban on "touch", it's clear that most people permit it within reasonable bounds.

Now hunting down cadet male staff because they are always trying to be around female staff...that's when conversations start to happen.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: sneakers on June 01, 2011, 10:36:03 PM
I've witnessed some instances of cadets trying to date other cadets or engaging in pda while at CAP activities, including encampment. Totally wrong -- should be shut down.

While it may be permissable (technically) for cadets to date each other outside of CAP, it should still be discouraged. Think of it this way. If Cadets A and B are dating and break up with each other, one or both of them may quit the squadron to avoid awkward situations around each other, or worse. Avoid it.
Title: Re: PDA
Post by: SarDragon on June 02, 2011, 12:49:42 AM
You're preaching to the choir here. If someone hasn't seen it already, they are likely to see it in the next year or two.

I had two cadets in my previous unit that were dating, and I was unaware of it until I saw them at a non-CAP aviation event. We discussed it a bit, and that was it. There was never any evidence of the relationship at the unit.