Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2019, 01:38:30 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  General Discussion  |  The Lobby  |  Topic: Show Yourself!
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 43 Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Show Yourself!  (Read 236239 times)
Flying Pig
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 5,069

« Reply #160 on: March 14, 2008, 04:54:09 PM »

There is nothing funnier than a dope dog sitting next to a pile of weed chewing on his toy!  A true window into the mindset of the land shark.
Report to moderator   Logged
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #161 on: March 14, 2008, 07:59:23 PM »


There ya go
Report to moderator   Logged
alamrcn
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 641
Unit: NCR-MN-047

Civil Air Patrol Patches
« Reply #162 on: March 14, 2008, 08:23:40 PM »

That's a lot of AH-64s back there! Where you at, Mother Rucker?

And hey, don't go near any Burdock plants with those big swatches of loop-Velcro.

-Ace
Report to moderator   Logged

 

Ace Browning, Maj, CAP
History Hoarder
71st Wing, Minnesota
mikeylikey
Banned

Posts: 3,755

« Reply #163 on: March 14, 2008, 09:09:22 PM »

DNALL you will look so much better with either a gold bar or a warant officer bar in place of that ugly "OCS" Velcro !   :)

Report to moderator   Logged
What's up monkeys?
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #164 on: March 14, 2008, 11:12:06 PM »

Tell me about it. Aug is so close yet so far away.

That's 7-6 Air Cav in Conroe actually. We did a cadet ALS there, PT'd around the birds, pretty cool. I'm assigned to 1-149 ARB at Ellington, which is also Apaches.
Report to moderator   Logged
Fifinella
Seasoned Member

Posts: 456
Unit: SWR-LA-001

« Reply #165 on: March 15, 2008, 05:34:26 AM »

hey, don't go near any Burdock plants with those big swatches of loop-Velcro.

-Ace

Didn't they remove a bunch of velcro from Gemini because of the fire hazard?  I'm just sayin'...did anyone consider that before they launched the new utility uniforms?  >:D ;D
Report to moderator   Logged
Judy LaValley, Maj, CAP
Asst. DCP, LAWG
SWR-LA-001
GRW #2753
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #166 on: March 15, 2008, 08:55:36 AM »

yeah... shh quiet so they don't hear us, hold on let me get my map, CRRRRSH!!! Ah crap.  :-\
Don't get me started on ACUs. Some features are awesome, some are absolutely stupid.
Report to moderator   Logged
Hawk200
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 4,638

« Reply #167 on: March 15, 2008, 08:18:04 PM »

yeah... shh quiet so they don't hear us, hold on let me get my map, CRRRRSH!!! Ah crap.  :-\
Don't get me started on ACUs. Some features are awesome, some are absolutely stupid.

Give it a few years, D. Talked to someone recently that met with a Propper rep. Apparently, the Army has been speaking with Propper on a redesigned uniform, due to the general dissatisfaction with the ACU.

Couple of things were discussed. Eliminating the Mandarin collar, redesigning the chest pockets, new pattern on the pants. Biggest thing is that it will most likely be in MultiCam.

Didn't they remove a bunch of velcro from Gemini because of the fire hazard?  I'm just sayin'...did anyone consider that before they launched the new utility uniforms?  >:D ;D

Velcro isn't really a fire hazard in itself. Biggest issue is the melting to you. The Velcro on the Aircrew ACU is designed to be extremely high temp resistant. Anything that will melt the Velcro will melt you too.
Report to moderator   Logged
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #168 on: March 15, 2008, 08:36:29 PM »

yeah... shh quiet so they don't hear us, hold on let me get my map, CRRRRSH!!! Ah crap.  :-\
Don't get me started on ACUs. Some features are awesome, some are absolutely stupid.

Give it a few years, D. Talked to someone recently that met with a Propper rep. Apparently, the Army has been speaking with Propper on a redesigned uniform, due to the general dissatisfaction with the ACU.

Couple of things were discussed. Eliminating the Mandarin collar, redesigning the chest pockets, new pattern on the pants. Biggest thing is that it will most likely be in MultiCam.
That's the rumors. I really got no porb with velcro closure on the shoulder & ankle pockets. The outer pocket where the patches go though shouldn't be. As you know, that sticks to everything & everyone. Go back to sewn on, including badges. Chest pockets aren't real useful no matter what the design, but if they're going to be there then slash pockets (like now) with zipper closure like flight suits, and extent the top so it rides the bottom of the branch/name tapes. Far as the collar, I could go for back to traditional & move the grade back up along with branch insignia, that'd be popular. Or, I could go with a redesign on the mandarin collar so it looks right in garrison config.

And multi-cam, man that would be way better. Gonna piss off the AF though. They made their uniform dif than ours but same basic color pallet so it kind of blends, and now we're talking about going to another dissimilar pallet. Yeah nice. Just for the love of God could everyone agree on one boot color we can all use. There's gotta be better things to waste the taxpayers dollars on.
Report to moderator   Logged
mikeylikey
Banned

Posts: 3,755

« Reply #169 on: March 15, 2008, 10:07:46 PM »

^ Seems the AF was the only service that has gone to something other than TAN boots.  That just means their boot costs are more than ours.  So, silly move on their part!

As far as bringing back branch insignia, I have been saying that since 03 when Army times ran the first pictures of the ACU's.

I would love to get patches, badges and insignia sewn on instead of Velcro.  Velcro is just plain crazy.  Honestly, the only thing that I have changed on my ACU's is the rank insignia and current unit patch.  Sewn on looks so much better. 

I would keep the mandarin collar though.  I have found it usefull, as I am sure others who have spent time in Iraq/AFGH do.
Report to moderator   Logged
What's up monkeys?
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #170 on: March 15, 2008, 10:25:56 PM »

Yeah I'm not saying get rid of it (the collar), just it can be changed slightly to make it better for both purposes. However, if that new under the armor shirt takes off, I could see a garrison version of the ACU top & that other thing have the mand collar. Who knows.

One of the things I really hate about velcro... when branch tapes are stuck down in the middle, but sticking out on the end. It looks like crap & catches on stuff. Annoying as hell. That & ending up plus or minus a flag when you pass someone in a hallway. It's freakin stupid. I don't even know why every service has to have their own utility uniform, that's the dumbest thing I ever heard, but different boots? That's psychotic.
Report to moderator   Logged
mikeylikey
Banned

Posts: 3,755

« Reply #171 on: March 15, 2008, 11:49:04 PM »

I don't even know why every service has to have their own utility uniform, that's the dumbest thing I ever heard, but different boots? That's psychotic.

I can't agree with you more.  Save tax dollars and use one utility.  On the boot issue, Marines are in tans, Army is in Tans, is the navy using tan boots (I think so), so why couldn't USAF also wear tan boots?  Are they better than everyone else?  I could see if they went with a blue boot (that whole Air Force blue thing), but come on!  They are only hurting themselves in the long run.  Their boots will cost so much more because less of them are being produced.  I think a highschool economics class will teach you that!

Report to moderator   Logged
What's up monkeys?
DNall
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,721

« Reply #172 on: March 16, 2008, 02:48:28 AM »

Blue boots? Sounds more umpa loompa than Air Force. And, blue suede boots? Just, no, okay, no. I'm not saying I like tan, I do like not shining them, and my issues are extremely comfortable, but we really all need to be in the same boots. Freakin truman got famous in the senate during WWII for something about like that IIRC. Need a little more of that in congress.
Report to moderator   Logged
NHQ-OS-126 Frank
Member

Posts: 82

« Reply #173 on: March 16, 2008, 09:10:27 PM »


There is an article about our squadron in the new edition of the CAP volunteer magazine....and there was a picture of me in there........ Just wanted to share it here as the title of the forum is: Show yourself.



* Frankmagazine.jpg (24.15 kB, 486x366 - viewed 318 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Deputy commander
Aerospace Education Officer
NHQ-OS-126 Spangdahlem AB
Germany
www.facebook.com/capspangdahlem
LX1MG
mikeylikey
Banned

Posts: 3,755

« Reply #174 on: March 16, 2008, 09:50:49 PM »

^ Are you missing your rank slides?
Report to moderator   Logged
What's up monkeys?
NHQ-OS-126 Frank
Member

Posts: 82

« Reply #175 on: March 16, 2008, 10:10:26 PM »


That's what I thought too....but they cut this picture out of a big one and I think the quality then was not so good anymore and they cut it between the CAP and the yellow bar so maybe thought that the picture looks better like this..........
Report to moderator   Logged
Deputy commander
Aerospace Education Officer
NHQ-OS-126 Spangdahlem AB
Germany
www.facebook.com/capspangdahlem
LX1MG
Hill CAP
Banned

Posts: 148

« Reply #176 on: March 16, 2008, 10:35:33 PM »



Ok so it was a test run for my Photo ID but its still the newest I have.
Report to moderator   Logged
Justin T. Adkinson
Former C/1st Lt and SM Capt
Extended Hiatus Statues
MIKE
Super Moderator

Posts: 5,460
Unit: LANTAREA

« Reply #177 on: March 17, 2008, 03:46:44 AM »

Not wearing a t-shirt under the uniform is not advisable, particularly for an ID photo.
Report to moderator   Logged
Mike Johnston
Eagle400
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 688

« Reply #178 on: March 17, 2008, 05:24:46 AM »

Not wearing a t-shirt under the uniform is not advisable, particularly for an ID photo.

Especially if you're featured in the uniform manual:



Note to self: put on t-shirt before the service shirt.

Photo found in figure 2-3, page 18.
Report to moderator   Logged
Hill CAP
Banned

Posts: 148

« Reply #179 on: March 17, 2008, 06:11:19 AM »

Not wearing a t-shirt under the uniform is not advisable, particularly for an ID photo.

Especially if you're featured in the uniform manual:



Note to self: put on t-shirt before the service shirt.

Photo found in figure 2-3, page 18.

the bad thing is I know and respect that man very much he is a Lt Col with Coastal Charleston now he was at Langley Sq when that was taken the SC patch was shopped
Report to moderator   Logged
Justin T. Adkinson
Former C/1st Lt and SM Capt
Extended Hiatus Statues
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 43 Send this topic Print 
CAP Talk  |  General Discussion  |  The Lobby  |  Topic: Show Yourself!
 


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 26 queries.