A 737? The USAF does not use 737s for cargo or pax.
Quote from: NIN on September 15, 2017, 09:11:17 PMA 737? The USAF does not use 737s for cargo or pax. You're right, they don't use 737's, they use C-40B/C's.
Quote from: PHall on September 16, 2017, 04:57:30 AMQuote from: NIN on September 15, 2017, 09:11:17 PMA 737? The USAF does not use 737s for cargo or pax. You're right, they don't use 737's, they use C-40B/C's.Not always, a handful of 737's.
Quote from: Vegas1972 on September 16, 2017, 04:21:41 PMQuote from: PHall on September 16, 2017, 04:57:30 AMQuote from: NIN on September 15, 2017, 09:11:17 PMA 737? The USAF does not use 737s for cargo or pax. You're right, they don't use 737's, they use C-40B/C's.Not always, a handful of 737's. The Air Force had a bunch of 737's before, aka the T-43A Navigation Trainers. Some of those were repurposed when the need for Navigators went down and they didn't need as many trainers.
Joe, how dare you bring up real world mission related weather intelligence when people are bickering about a plane that most of them have never seen.....
The military has been using DV as an acronym for over 50 years for O-6 and above. Also for E-9 and high level civilians
Quote from: MSG Mac on September 17, 2017, 12:38:01 AMThe military has been using DV as an acronym for over 50 years for O-6 and above. Also for E-9 and high level civiliansO-6’s and GS-15’s, yes.E-9’s are not DV ranked besides getting a suite in lodging and a nice parking place. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk