CAP Federated Authentication, 2016 Edition

[JeffDG]

I'm not sure you can, beyond transcribing look and feel.  G-Sites is basically its "own thing".

Yeah, and kinda crippled in terms of some of the stuff you can do.

For a basic site, it's fantastic.  But when you try to get "cool" it's not your best bet.

[Eclipse]

^ I don't disagree, but cool can be handled as the exceptions - it would be nice if every
unit had a "basic" site which was at least updated on a regular basis.

[JeffDG]

^ I don't disagree, but cool can be handled as the exceptions - it would be nice if every
unit had a "basic" site which was at least updated on a regular basis.

I'm a strong advocate of a "public" website, for the general public, and an "internal" website for members.

Google is great for that internal site, because once you implement docs and spreasheets, and you set up your authentication, you just give rights to certain members to certain things and voila.