Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2013, 10:24:09 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Cadet Programs  |  Cadet Programs Management & Activities  |  Topic: Cadets in college
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All Print
Author Topic: Cadets in college  (Read 2626 times)
68w10
Forum Regular

Posts: 101

« Reply #60 on: August 26, 2012, 02:47:50 PM »

^ For the same reason you do not mix "adults" and cadets in the same cadres.

Anyone who has completed basic training, or who is in the military on AD is no longer a cadet in the sense that CAP defines
it, they have moved on to a different level of life, experienced much more of the real world, and should not be considered a
a peer to a "normal" CAP cadet.

Would you make the same argument for an over-18 Cadet who's completed their first or second year in an ROTC program?
Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 18,614

« Reply #61 on: August 26, 2012, 02:57:49 PM »

Would you make the same argument for an over-18 Cadet who's completed their first or second year in an ROTC program?

No, and neither does CAP.
Logged
AngelWings
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,194

« Reply #62 on: August 26, 2012, 03:01:18 PM »

So why does that rule exsist anyways?
Logged
Garibaldi
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 861
Unit: SER-GA-065

« Reply #63 on: August 26, 2012, 03:06:03 PM »

It's called "reading the regs", "following the regs", and "not avoiding uncomfortable conversations".

In this case, you'd be arguing with clear regs as to when a member becomes ineligible for cadet status.
A regulation which is many times misguidedly ignored.

OK...one more.

I am not "avoiding uncomfortable conversations." I am choosing my battles a little more carefully. Or are you saying avoiding uncomfortable conversations in the sense of the conversation between a cc and the cadet?
Logged
arajca
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,411

« Reply #64 on: August 26, 2012, 03:12:00 PM »

It's called "reading the regs", "following the regs", and "not avoiding uncomfortable conversations".

In this case, you'd be arguing with clear regs as to when a member becomes ineligible for cadet status.
A regulation which is many times misguidedly ignored.

But the regs make it clear that Guardsmen/Reservists are exempt from the Active Duty rule.
Unless they're on extended active duty, i.e called and sent overseas for six months.
Logged
He who has the most lug nuts wins.
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 18,614

« Reply #65 on: August 26, 2012, 03:12:29 PM »

Or are you saying avoiding uncomfortable conversations in the sense of the conversation between a cc and the cadet?

Correct. I'd say 1/3 of CAP's issues locally are fully-aware commanders who choose to ignore issues they are required to act on because
the conversation would be "uncomfortable" - whether that's uniforms worn inappropriately, cadets on active duty who are allowed to remain
cadets, or any of the other myriad issues which are seemingly clearly prescribed yet we can't seem to get past.

Those local problems are then exported to larger-scale activities, ES, etc. 
Logged
68w10
Forum Regular

Posts: 101

« Reply #66 on: August 26, 2012, 03:17:58 PM »

It's called "reading the regs", "following the regs", and "not avoiding uncomfortable conversations".

In this case, you'd be arguing with clear regs as to when a member becomes ineligible for cadet status.
A regulation which is many times misguidedly ignored.

But the regs make it clear that Guardsmen/Reservists are exempt from the Active Duty rule.
Unless they're on extended active duty, i.e called and sent overseas for six months.

You're absolutely correct; however Guardsmen/Reservists who have only completed IET are still exempt from the rule.
Logged
usafaux2004
200,000th Post Author
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,057
Unit: GLR-IL-049

« Reply #67 on: August 26, 2012, 03:54:58 PM »

Right. At issue here is a cadet who is in the guard claiming to be active military and being aware of many others like him.

As I said earlier, either he is misusing his status and calling it active duty, or he should not be a cadet. Clear cut, and we have regulations that outline this.
Logged

Mitchell Award: 54586 (31 Mar 2006); Earhart Award: 13815 (30 Mar 2007)
Ass't. Squadron Leadership Officer
Ass't. Cadet Activities Officer
Ass't. Testing Officer
cadetesman
Member

Posts: 91

« Reply #68 on: August 26, 2012, 04:05:45 PM »

Why anyone in the military would want to be a cadet befuddles me...

I mean, you're in the actual military, why would you want to be in CAP as a cadet, I mean, really...
Logged
Extremepredjudice
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,443
Unit: Freebooter

« Reply #69 on: August 26, 2012, 04:08:16 PM »

Why anyone in the military would want to be a cadet befuddles me...

I mean, you're in the actual military, why would you want to be in CAP as a cadet, I mean, really...
'Cause being a cadet is a lot of fun.
Logged
Hanlon's Razor
Occam's Razor
"Flight make chant; I good leader"
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 18,614

« Reply #70 on: August 26, 2012, 04:13:25 PM »

I mean, you're in the actual military, why would you want to be in CAP as a cadet, I mean, really...

There are a number of opportunities and benefits that CAP affords to its cadets, especially older ones, that you would not get by simply "being in the military".

That's why cadet status is a privilege.
Logged
Rodriguez
Member

Posts: 57

« Reply #71 on: August 27, 2012, 09:27:15 AM »

That cites AD military, but reserve/guard components aren't bothered by that. Cadets can be concurrent Reserve/Guard military members and CAP cadets at once.

Which I think is what most of you knew I meant. If i wanted to put active duty, which I currently am not, then I would have. But being in an active Guard or Reserve unit still qualifies you as a member of the "active military" your just not on active duty.

Logged
-C/Capt. Rodriguez, Ranger Staff, 11B Infantryman 53rd Brigade Combat Team FLARNG
Equinox
Member

Posts: 60

« Reply #72 on: September 29, 2012, 08:33:01 PM »

I don't think the regs are for the safety of cadets, I think we have them to avoid awkwardness.

Anyways, though, anyone hear about the married 20 year old cadet airman who's a corporal in the Army? I think he graduated from his basic encampment this year.

Now wasn't that awkward?   ;)
Logged
Signature edited.  Violation of Membership Code of Conduct.
MSG Mac
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 862
Unit: MER-MD-071

« Reply #73 on: September 30, 2012, 12:23:32 AM »

Marriage automatically removes you from the cadet program.
Logged
Michael P. McEleney
Lt Col CAP
MSG USA (Retired)
Ned
Resident Philosopher

Posts: 1,489

« Reply #74 on: September 30, 2012, 12:48:49 AM »

Usually, but not always.
Logged
RADIOMAN015
Banned

Posts: 1,990

« Reply #75 on: September 30, 2012, 11:38:20 PM »

I see absolutely NO advantage to CAP at the local squadron level to allow cadets who reach the age of 18 years old to remain in the cadet program.   I think it leads to other issues.    CAP is primarily a 12 to 16/17 year old program, with maybe a few staying longer.   I've noted that ALL of our cadets that have gone to college are NOT involved in the CAP program anymore.  They may be involved in ROTC and that is the correct passage in my opinion from CAP cadet status.
RM
Logged
a2capt
300,000th Post Author
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,487
Unit: pǝʇɹǝʌuı

« Reply #76 on: September 30, 2012, 11:39:08 PM »

This guy is really a whackjob in disquise.
Logged
68w10
Forum Regular

Posts: 101

« Reply #77 on: September 30, 2012, 11:56:12 PM »

I see absolutely NO advantage to CAP at the local squadron level to allow cadets who reach the age of 18 years old to remain in the cadet program.   I think it leads to other issues. 
Like what?  To what issues are you specifically referring?

  CAP is primarily a 12 to 16/17 year old program, with maybe a few staying longer.   
To quote EP, please cite this.  There's plenty of data available on this topic, so I don't think it's unreasonable to ask you to substantiate this claim.

I've noted that ALL of our cadets that have gone to college are NOT involved in the CAP program anymore.  They may be involved in ROTC and that is the correct passage in my opinion from CAP cadet status.
RM
Not every Cadet goes through ROTC.  Not every Cadet has gotten the most out of CAP by the time they reach the age of 18.  After turning 17 (the age which you cite as being the time when most Cadets should leave), I participated in NESA, RCLS, COS, IACE, NBB Staff and numerous Encampments (in 3 states) as staff.  Do you genuinely believe that I had nothing to gain/offer in all of those circumstances simply based on my age?
Logged
spaatzmom
Forum Regular

Posts: 198

« Reply #78 on: September 30, 2012, 11:58:06 PM »

I see absolutely NO advantage to CAP at the local squadron level to allow cadets who reach the age of 18 years old to remain in the cadet program.   I think it leads to other issues. 
Like what?  To what issues are you specifically referring?

  CAP is primarily a 12 to 16/17 year old program, with maybe a few staying longer.   
To quote EP, please cite this.  There's plenty of data available on this topic, so I don't think it's unreasonable to ask you to substantiate this claim.

I've noted that ALL of our cadets that have gone to college are NOT involved in the CAP program anymore.  They may be involved in ROTC and that is the correct passage in my opinion from CAP cadet status.
RM
Not every Cadet goes through ROTC.  Not every Cadet has gotten the most out of CAP by the time they reach the age of 18.  After turning 17 (the age which you cite as being the time when most Cadets should leave), I participated in NESA, RCLS, COS, IACE, NBB Staff and numerous Encampments (in 3 states) as staff.  Do you genuinely believe that I had nothing to gain/offer in all of those circumstances simply based on my age?


 :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All Print 
CAP Talk  |  Cadet Programs  |  Cadet Programs Management & Activities  |  Topic: Cadets in college
 


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.4 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.239 seconds with 26 queries.