CAP Membership Dues Changes FY 2011

Started by RADIOMAN015, September 18, 2010, 04:42:47 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jimmydeanno

When did they ditch the 3-year renewals?  I renewed in May and mine expires in 2013...
If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law. - Winston Churchill

Nolan Teel

wait, they did away with 3 year renewals?  That was great for units!  We could get a member to renew for 3 and not chase them down year after year. 

Eclipse

There's a difference between a flat spreadsheet with names and expiration dates and accounting for paid-forward revenue that has to
stand up to IRS scrutiny.

Let's at least compare like fruit.

Also, we have no knowledge as to "why" it was a problem for the software, which could be anything from a glitch, the dollars being incorrectly categorized, to it being against a hard-fast IRS rule as defined by the software or the law.

Those dues are also split up with a percentage forwarded to the wings for their dues.

This is not your grandma's checkbook, and perhaps NHQ simply decided it was more trouble than it was worth for the relatively small
number of members taking advantage of the program.

Quote from: jimmydeanno on September 22, 2010, 04:10:56 PM
When did they ditch the 3-year renewals?  I renewed in May and mine expires in 2013...

We're talking about the lifetime renewals that exceed 3 years.

"That Others May Zoom"

Capt Rivera

Sounds like a quick poll might show renewed interest in the 3 and lifetime options...
- I would probably take the 3 and consider the life time at my next renewal...
//Signed//

Joshua Rivera, Capt, CAP
Squadron Commander
Grand Forks Composite Squadron
North Dakota Wing, Civil Air Patrol
http://www.grandforkscap.org

Eclipse

Quote from: Capt Rivera on September 22, 2010, 04:56:11 PM
Sounds like a quick poll might show renewed interest in the 3 and lifetime options...
- I would probably take the 3 and consider the life time at my next renewal...

3 is is non-issue, but lifetime...

100% "yes" from the active participants here wouldn't justify the idea.

"That Others May Zoom"