CAP Talk

Cadet Programs => Cadet Programs Management & Activities => Topic started by: Omen on August 02, 2017, 12:24:49 PM

Title: Logistics SDA
Post by: Omen on August 02, 2017, 12:24:49 PM
One of the performance requirements is to list 10 necessary items for a new cadet squadron. Really?? That is way too much. And I don't want to be one of those people who list every tiny item (i.e 1. work gloves, 2. safety goggles. I just put them under safety supplies). Any items or tips for the SDA, in general, would be appreciated.
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Luis R. Ramos on August 02, 2017, 01:08:39 PM
Does your squadron has a Logistics Officer? If not, maybe a Safety Officer or a Cadet Programs Officer.

Did you talk to either?

Any could have been your primary sources of information
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Spaceman3750 on August 02, 2017, 03:06:07 PM
10 is a very short list compared to the number of things actually needed (or nice to have).

Complaining on the internet that you don't like a very realistic task and thought exercise is not a good quality for a cadet officer.
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: arajca on August 02, 2017, 03:25:07 PM
As a cadet officer, you should have more than a passing familiarity with the regs. One purpose of the SDAs is to help cadet officers understand what it takes to actually run a squadron.

Consider CAPR 20-3(I).
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on August 02, 2017, 05:47:03 PM
One of the performance requirements is to list 10 necessary items for a new cadet squadron. Really?? That is way too much. And I don't want to be one of those people who list every tiny item (i.e 1. work gloves, 2. safety goggles. I just put them under safety supplies). Any items or tips for the SDA, in general, would be appreciated.


You contradict your own statements in two sentences. Impressive.
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Luis R. Ramos on August 03, 2017, 07:43:48 AM
What is more impressive is that here most seniors say "admonish in private." Yet send messages like these.

I thought telling this cadet his statement was negative. Refrained from doing so. As I have been told "doing so in public is not cool."

Impressive. Do as I say, not as I do...
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on August 04, 2017, 10:34:24 AM
What is more impressive is that here most seniors say "admonish in private." Yet send messages like these.

I thought telling this cadet his statement was negative. Refrained from doing so. As I have been told "doing so in public is not cool."

Impressive. Do as I say, not as I do...


It's a cadet officer whining about a simple assignment...nothing to admonish in private.
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Luis R. Ramos on August 04, 2017, 10:52:30 AM
Should not make any difference. From now on, I will stuck my tongue at anyone that says "admonish in private."

This will be my icon:

                                             :P

Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Eclipse on August 04, 2017, 10:56:35 AM
Shouldn't you be admonishing him in private?

Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Luis R. Ramos on August 04, 2017, 11:07:37 AM
Eclipse, he gave me the authority to admonish him publicly.

For you, Eclipse, I will not stick my tongue at you. I respect you too much.

 ;)

Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on August 04, 2017, 12:01:52 PM
Eclipse, he gave me the authority to admonish him publicly.

For you, Eclipse, I will not stick my tongue at you. I respect you too much.

 ;)


I see that your focus is here:


Quote
Luis R. Ramos (http://captalk.net/index.php?action=profile;u=4395)
Salty & Seasoned Contributor
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: Luis R. Ramos on August 04, 2017, 12:51:02 PM
AAAaaaaahhHHHH! He found me! He OUTED me!

Now I cannot hide!
Title: Re: Logistics SDA
Post by: SarDragon on August 04, 2017, 04:19:27 PM
And we're done here, too.

Click.