CAP Talk

General Discussion => The Lobby => Topic started by: jimmydeanno on August 26, 2009, 05:33:34 PM

Title: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: jimmydeanno on August 26, 2009, 05:33:34 PM
Not the most exciting article, but we got a mention:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/26/AR2009082601947.html
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: Strick on August 26, 2009, 06:11:34 PM
 :clap:
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: Cecil DP on August 26, 2009, 11:39:18 PM
The operation is designed to hone NORAD's intercept and identification operations and test the NCR Visual Warning System. I doubt the viability of the test when they tell people that at a certain time they will be infiltrated.
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: Gunner C on August 27, 2009, 12:04:51 AM
Quote from: Cecil DP on August 26, 2009, 11:39:18 PM
The operation is designed to hone NORAD's intercept and identification operations and test the NCR Visual Warning System. I doubt the viability of the test when they tell people that at a certain time they will be infiltrated.
We do it every day, time certain or not.  Nothing gets through.  The system is multilayered and, if need be, deadly.  Your comments are decidely unschooled.  Doing these intercepts at night within a few miles of three large airports, several smaller ones, an air force base, and multitudes of national icons requires a bit of "canned" exercise.  Remember, the ADIZ and the FRZ are active, as are all of the defenses.  If these exercises weren't announced in advance and coordinated with all the players, someone could get killed.
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: CAPSGT on August 27, 2009, 01:11:41 AM
These missions come in all shapes and forms.  The visual warning system test should be nothing more than checking to make sure that a warning light that is on 24/7 can actually be seen.  There are a bunch of them all around the edges of the DC SFRA to alert pilots that they are about to enter the restricted airspace.

As for the advance warning, yes it takes away a bit of the element of surprise, but nonetheless, it still tests the skills of an intercept pilot, much like CAP's SAREXes, which may lack an element of surprise, but still give a chance to test skills.
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: RiverAux on August 27, 2009, 02:52:26 AM
Announcements of these tests in the DC area, including mention of CAP, are almost routine.  I seem to get them with my news gatherer almost monthly. 
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: Pylon on August 27, 2009, 05:35:27 PM
I thought this recent article about our airborne intercept practice missions had a much nicer mention of CAP's role:

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123164147
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: coolkites on September 08, 2009, 01:50:12 AM
Quote from: Pylon on August 27, 2009, 05:35:27 PM
I thought this recent article about our airborne intercept practice missions had a much nicer mention of CAP's role:

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123164147

Agreed, nice mention
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: Airrace on September 08, 2009, 12:21:48 PM
Any good news about CAP is a welcome sight.
Title: Re: CAP in the Washington Post
Post by: C/MSgt Lunsford on September 14, 2009, 05:59:54 AM
Quote from: Pylon on August 27, 2009, 05:35:27 PM
I thought this recent article about our airborne intercept practice missions had a much nicer mention of CAP's role:

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123164147
I'll give that article a big, Hoorah! ;)