Main Menu

AF Edgimication Center

Started by Stonewall, April 24, 2008, 08:38:19 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shorning

Quote from: PHall on April 26, 2008, 08:07:29 PM
I'm a former KC-10 Boom Operator...

So you got paid to lay around all day passing gas?!?    :D

AlphaSigOU

Quote from: shorning on April 26, 2008, 08:16:30 PM
Quote from: PHall on April 26, 2008, 08:07:29 PM
I'm a former KC-10 Boom Operator...

So you got paid to lay around all day passing gas?!?    :D

'Gucci' boomers sit down and pass gas... their boomer brethren on KC-135s lie down on the job!  ;D

Keeping it on topic, I remember back WIWOAD at 'Spang Quentin' they put up a new sign for one of the Army's ADA (Air Defense Artillery) batteries. It was supposed to read  'HHB 6/56 ADA' (Headquarters and Headquarters Battery 6th Battery 56th ADA) but was alll hosed up: "HHB 6/56 ARMEY". Needless to say the battery commander was right on the phone with the Spang base commander... it got fixed right away.
Lt Col Charles E. (Chuck) Corway, CAP
Gill Robb Wilson Award (#2901 - 2011)
Amelia Earhart Award (#1257 - 1982) - C/Major (retired)
Billy Mitchell Award (#2375 - 1981)
Administrative/Personnel/Professional Development Officer
Nellis Composite Squadron (PCR-NV-069)
KJ6GHO - NAR 45040

afgeo4

Quote from: PHall on April 26, 2008, 08:07:29 PM
Quote from: afgeo4 on April 26, 2008, 07:36:40 PMTinker used to have an associate unit that trained KC-10 crews before they moved (nearby) to Altus.

Nope, each KC-10 base trains their own crews and maintenance people.
Training is part of the support contract for the KC-10.
I'm a former KC-10 Boom Operator, so I might know just a little bit about this.
That's great... it's what numerous crews from McGuire have told me... I was with the 514th AMW there (Res), but I worked on C-141's.
GEORGE LURYE

PHall

#23
Quote from: afgeo4 on April 27, 2008, 12:45:23 AM
That's great... it's what numerous crews from McGuire have told me... I was with the 514th AMW there (Res), but I worked on C-141's.

I bet they smiling when they told you that. Now, were they KC-10 crew members or C-141 crew members?
The 141 guys wouldn't know any more then you do.

The contractor who has the training contract for the KC-10's (currently Boeing) is responsible for conducting all training for both aircrew and maintenance personnel.

There never has been a "schoolhouse" for KC-10 training other then the simulator facility at each KC-10 base.

Air Force Maintenance only does home station maintenance to include "B" checks with contractor support.
Depot maintenance or "D" checks are handled by whoever gets the contract. At one time it was American Airlines.

You may have noticed a bunch of AGE equipment that is painted light blue on the ramp at McGuire.
That stuff is owned by the maintenance contractor and can only be used on the KC-10's.
Use it on something else and the legal office gets a notice of a Breech of Contract suit.

afgeo4

Quote from: PHall on April 27, 2008, 03:33:49 AM
Quote from: afgeo4 on April 27, 2008, 12:45:23 AM
That's great... it's what numerous crews from McGuire have told me... I was with the 514th AMW there (Res), but I worked on C-141's.

I bet they smiling when they told you that. Now, were they KC-10 crew members or C-141 crew members?
The 141 guys wouldn't know any more then you do.

The contractor who has the training contract for the KC-10's (currently Boeing) is responsible for conducting all training for both aircrew and maintenance personnel.

There never has been a "schoolhouse" for KC-10 training other then the simulator facility at each KC-10 base.

Air Force Maintenance only does home station maintenance to include "B" checks with contractor support.
Depot maintenance or "D" checks are handled by whoever gets the contract. At one time it was American Airlines.

You may have noticed a bunch of AGE equipment that is painted light blue on the ramp at McGuire.
That stuff is owned by the maintenance contractor and can only be used on the KC-10's.
Use it on something else and the legal office gets a notice of a Breech of Contract suit.
They were Cadillac drivers... and they're always smiling.

Unlike the base commander at Tinker when he sees this photo.
GEORGE LURYE

SAR-EMT1

Quote from: PHall on April 27, 2008, 03:33:49 AM
Quote from: afgeo4 on April 27, 2008, 12:45:23 AM
That's great... it's what numerous crews from McGuire have told me... I was with the 514th AMW there (Res), but I worked on C-141's.


That stuff is owned by the maintenance contractor and can only be used on the KC-10's.
Use it on something else and the legal office gets a notice of a Breech of Contract suit.

It is really sad that this is what the Air Force has come to. Then again I think it a crime that the military has more civillians then uniformed members.

I want a return to the Cuban Missile Crisis, the threat of Communism, and the kind of funding that only Reagan could give.   ::)
C. A. Edgar
AUX USCG Flotilla 8-8
Former CC / GLR-IL-328
Firefighter, Paramedic, Grad Student

PHall

Quote from: SAR-EMT1 on April 27, 2008, 08:04:35 AM
Quote from: PHall on April 27, 2008, 03:33:49 AM
Quote from: afgeo4 on April 27, 2008, 12:45:23 AM
That's great... it's what numerous crews from McGuire have told me... I was with the 514th AMW there (Res), but I worked on C-141's.


That stuff is owned by the maintenance contractor and can only be used on the KC-10's.
Use it on something else and the legal office gets a notice of a Breech of Contract suit.

It is really sad that this is what the Air Force has come to. Then again I think it a crime that the military has more civillians then uniformed members.

I want a return to the Cuban Missile Crisis, the threat of Communism, and the kind of funding that only Reagan could give.   ::)

That equipment was provided by McDonnell-Douglas as part of their maintenance-support contract.
McDonnell-Douglas (now Boeing) owns it, it is not government property. It's private property.

MikeD

Quote from: NIN on April 24, 2008, 09:26:44 PM


In theory, all, or at least MOST of the people here should be rocket scientists of one sort or another.



As a NASA engineer, I shudder in horror at the spelling and grammer and such in a lot of our project papers and presentations.
Also, from what I've seen, we took the list of things NOT to do in a powerpoint presentation, and turned it into a checklist for making slides...

ßτε

Quote from: MikeD on April 27, 2008, 08:46:03 PM

As a NASA engineer, I shudder in horror at the spelling and grammer and such in a lot of our project papers and presentations.
Also, from what I've seen, we took the list of things NOT to do in a powerpoint presentation, and turned it into a checklist for making slides...
;D

SarDragon

That's a common tendency among Grammar Cops. And the more the message counts, or the harsher it is, the greater the likelihood that the poster will make a misteak in his/her post.  ;)
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
50 Year Member
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret

MikeD

Quote from: bte on April 27, 2008, 10:12:43 PM
Quote from: MikeD on April 27, 2008, 08:46:03 PM

As a NASA engineer, I shudder in horror at the spelling and grammer and such in a lot of our project papers and presentations.
Also, from what I've seen, we took the list of things NOT to do in a powerpoint presentation, and turned it into a checklist for making slides...
;D

to quote Ralph from The Simpsons "Me fail english?  Thats unpossible!"

Duke Dillio

Quote from: SarDragon on April 28, 2008, 09:56:35 AM
That's a common tendency among Grammar Cops. And the more the message counts, or the harsher it is, the greater the likelihood that the poster will make a misteak in his/her post.  ;)

Hmmmm, did someone stay Steak?  Yummmmmmm

flyerthom

Quote from: SarDragon on April 28, 2008, 09:56:35 AM
That's a common tendency among Grammar Cops. And the more the message counts, or the harsher it is, the greater the likelihood that the poster will make a misteak in his/her post.  ;)

rare or well done? And what kind of critter is a mis that you et steak from it?
TC