Main Menu

Putting a pack together

Started by fokkerfrenzy, February 03, 2014, 05:06:52 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ed Bos

Quote from: Eclipse on February 04, 2014, 02:24:06 AM
Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 03, 2014, 11:48:21 PMRegardless of this potential issue, compasses sold at retailers like Walmart are just junk, and not suitable for land navigation during GSAR operations.

Strongly non-concur.

CAP operates in a +/- 5 degree universe.  For the average member doing the average mission, the human factor
is going to introduce more error then a resonably working compass, which yes, you should check when you buy it.

...are fine, especially for new members and cadets.  If you know how to use them, they will get you where you
need to be, within the margins of error we work in.

Respectfully non-concur.

The training materials we use specify using compasses with 2 degree graduation, and purchasing the best you can afford at front means you spend less in the long term.

I find that inexpensive orienteering compasses frequently acquire air bubbles in the housing that push the needle off course, and that they need to be replaced if they are going to be used for land navigation.

Also the "+/- 5 degree universe" you speak of isn't universal. I've had to use my compass for cross-country land navigation before, and accuracy matters.

Cheers.
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

Ed Bos

Quote from: fokkerfrenzy on February 03, 2014, 05:06:52 PM
I was hoping to get some insight/ recommendations from people who've had some experience.  Is there a better way of putting together a 24/72 hours pack from scratch than buying everything one piece at a time?

Obviously some things can only be bought separately, notebooks, flashlights, etc.  I was wondering if anyone has a found a good source for some of the other bits like the climbing stuff, and first aid.  Is there anywhere to get a kit that contains most of these items that is affordable, and won't have a lot of stuff left over that won't go in?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts you guys might have.

You're probably much better off speaking to someone in your local area with experience, rather than a bunch of folks from all over the country who do things a little differently. I teach at the NESA Ground Team Leader course frequently, so I hope I have a decent leg to stand on in terms of experience... It is usually a good idea to go with local area knowledge.

PM me if you'd like some points of contact in your area, but I'd recommend starting with your unit ES or SAR Officer.

Cheers.
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

LSThiker

#22
Quote from: Ed Bos on February 04, 2014, 08:47:26 AM
Also the "+/- 5 degree universe" you speak of isn't universal. I've had to use my compass for cross-country land navigation before, and accuracy matters.

While +/- 5 degree is not "universal", it is the standard for CAP.  Anything less is not necessary for the vast majority of missions in CAP.  The vast majority of members will only use the compass for simply taking an ELT bearing and will never do anything remotely similar to land navigation outside of the training required for CAP. 

Cross-country orienteering, as defined by International Orienteering Foundation, is simply finding the same set points in the same order.  Distance is not defined although the IOF defines a "classic" or "long" course as being able to finish within 90 minutes.  Courses will typically consist of 6 to 12 control points.  So simply saying a cross-country course does not mean much as the longest point could only be 200 meters or 400 meters away. 

Besides, land navigation over miles or kilometers is best done by terrain association.  Compass navigation is best left to shorter distances of less than 1 km, optimally less than 500 m for most people, between control points in my opinion.  Can compass navigation be done for long distances?  Sure as evidenced in the past, but it depends on what you want to call within your margin of error. 

Eclipse

Quote from: LSThiker on February 04, 2014, 02:26:07 PM
Quote from: Ed Bos on February 04, 2014, 08:47:26 AM
Also the "+/- 5 degree universe" you speak of isn't universal. I've had to use my compass for cross-country land navigation before, and accuracy matters.

While +/- 5 degree is not "universal", it is the standard for CAP.  Anything less is not necessary for the vast majority of missions in CAP.  The vast majority of members will only use the compass for simply taking an ELT bearing and will never do anything remotely similar to land navigation outside of the training required for CAP. 

Exactly - whatever may, or may not, be relevent, appropriate, or "better" for some other agency or organization is irreverent in discussions specific to CAP
requirements.

If the member also participates in the "Hyper Accurate Orienteering & Explorers Club of America (Lower Section, West Quadrant), then they may
have other needs to balance the higher cost of a more accurate compass.  That's no different then a CAP member who is also a ham and decides
to spend $3000 on a radio when $75 would suffice.

For the things CAP members will use their compass' for - basic land nav (i.e. which way is North), triangulation of their position or the location
of something else during a search, etc., That $10 compass, assuming it is working correctly, is fine, as is the app on their phone.

A new GTM can find everything they need in the camping aisle at Walmart.  The more serious move up to Target, and the HardKewl go to
Bass Pro Shops.   Those with more dollars then sense start off on the internet buying a $200 molle vest and level up from there.

And at the end of the day, the ELT is located "over there, somewhere", most lunches come from McDonald's, and the "shelters" have towel service.

"That Others May Zoom"

a2capt

LOL, "the more serious move up to Target".

It's the same stuff. Ozark vs. Embark. Woopdie-doo.

Storm Chaser

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but not all opinions are created equal. Since Ed is a GSAR Team Leader instructor at NESA, I'll defer to his judgement. Others are welcome to disagree.

I own a Walmart lensatic compass, which I've used in the field, and it's not a very good compass. For less than $7 more, the Suunto A-10 is a much better deal than the Stansport orienteering compass available at Walmart. To me, it's a no brainer.

ReCAP

Anything with a magnetized needle is going to point North.  However, take a close look at the first one:
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Stansport-Deluxe-Map-Compass/10927620

You draw your course on the map, lay the edge of the baseplate on the line, rotate the bezel until the orientation lines match the grid on the map.  Now just read your course off the bezel where the index line is... wait...  There is no index line! 

LSThiker

Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 05:59:17 PM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but not all opinions are created equal. Since Ed is a GSAR Team Leader instructor at NESA, I'll defer to his judgement. Others are welcome to disagree.

Ever hear of the fallacy: appeal to authority or argument of authority?

The point is that while not every compass is created equally, price does not determine the quality of a compass. Some cases that is true. For example, comparing my silnylon tent to a tent made for walmart. Sure my tent will cost more, but that is because it is made of better fabric that is lighter and stronger.  However that tent from walmart is good enough for CAP missions. Just because it is sold at Walmart or equal stores does not mean it is junk and wont work for CAP.  I have gotten rid of many military compasses, which value somewhere around $90 to $100 IRC.  Does that mean they are junk as well?

Eclipse

Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 05:59:17 PMI own a Walmart lensatic compass, which I've used in the field, and it's not a very good compass. For less than $7 more, the Suunto A-10 is a much better deal than the Stansport orienteering compass available at Walmart. To me, it's a no brainer.

Yes, and for $7 more, and $12 more, etc., etc.

I have an artillery compass that's marked in MILS,

used properly, the accuracy of a standard compass of any type will pale in comparison.  It's also functionally useless for CAP work.

The average person doesn't need a Stiletto TB15MS hammer, either.  The $7 one from the next aisle over from the camping gear,
or even the little one in the home Christmas kit will do just fine.  The Stilletto will last longer and work better, in the right hands, but
works exactly the same when it's sitting in the drawer.

Yes you can spend more for higher quality tools that will last longer and give you a potentially better experience.
But that doesn't change the fact that you can complete a functional 24-hour kit in the camping aisle for under $50.

"That Others May Zoom"

Storm Chaser

Quote from: LSThiker on February 04, 2014, 06:22:56 PM
Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 05:59:17 PM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but not all opinions are created equal. Since Ed is a GSAR Team Leader instructor at NESA, I'll defer to his judgement. Others are welcome to disagree.

Ever hear of the fallacy: appeal to authority or argument of authority?

The point is that while not every compass is created equally, price does not determine the quality of a compass. Some cases that is true. For example, comparing my silnylon tent to a tent made for walmart. Sure my tent will cost more, but that is because it is made of better fabric that is lighter and stronger.  However that tent from walmart is good enough for CAP missions. Just because it is sold at Walmart or equal stores does not mean it is junk and wont work for CAP.  I have gotten rid of many military compasses, which value somewhere around $90 to $100 IRC.  Does that mean they are junk as well?

Except that I never argued that "price... determines the quality of a compass". I presented an economical alternative to the compass available at Walmart. Please reread my posts.

Storm Chaser

Quote from: Eclipse on February 04, 2014, 06:30:29 PM
...It's also functionally useless for CAP work...

That's certainly YOUR opinion, but not necessarily that of every active ground team leader in CAP.

Cheers!

Eclipse

Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 07:39:02 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 04, 2014, 06:30:29 PM
...It's also functionally useless for CAP work...

That's certainly YOUR opinion, but not necessarily that of every active ground team leader in CAP.

Cheers!

I'll bite, what possible use is a compass in mils to CAP in the context of entry-level equipment for newbs
and our +/-5 universe.

"That Others May Zoom"

LSThiker

Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Except that I never argued that "price... determines the quality of a compass". I presented an economical alternative to the compass available at Walmart. Please reread my posts.

You stated:
Quote from: Storm ChaserRegardless of this potential issue, compasses sold at retailers like Walmart are just junk, and not suitable for land navigation during GSAR operations.

and then when I asked why, you stated:

QuoteFor less than $7 more, the Suunto A-10 is a much better deal than the Stansport orienteering compass available at Walmart. To me, it's a no brainer.

This sounded as though you were implying because the Sunnto A-10 is $7 more it is better than the Walmart compasses.  So again, why do you think they are not suitable for land navigation or CAP work?

ol'fido

A Silva Polaris compass is probably $12-15 and you can sometimes find them at Walmart or at least you used to be able to. That is probably sufficient for the average GTM. GTLs on the other hand would probably want to upgrade to a Silva Guide compass(about $25-30). If you want be super high speed double that ($50) for a Silva Ranger. You can also go for the equivalents from Sunto or Brunton.

+/-3* is what I was taught and used in the Army and in CAP. That was generally sufficient. +/- 1* is probably good for orienteering to pin point targets. If you are smart, you can use a =/- 5* as well as one of the more precise compasses.
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006

Eclipse

O-201 Use a compass from the GT & Urban task guide:

"1. Successfully give the magnetic azimuth to a distant object +/- 5 degrees within 2 minutes. "

Honestly?  I was shocked when I saw that myself (1 Million years ago), since you can get yourself pretty
far off course with +/-5, especially if you shoot it far off and keep introducing the same error, but it is what it is.

"That Others May Zoom"

Storm Chaser


Quote from: Eclipse on February 04, 2014, 11:10:45 PM
O-201 Use a compass from the GT & Urban task guide:

"1. Successfully give the magnetic azimuth to a distant object +/- 5 degrees within 2 minutes. "

Honestly?  I was shocked when I saw that myself (1 Million years ago), since you can get yourself pretty
far off course with +/-5, especially if you shoot it far off and keep introducing the same error, but it is what it is.

That refers to the evaluation criteria to pass that task, not the level in which "CAP operates", as you described on a previous post.

LSThiker

#36
Quote from: Eclipse on February 04, 2014, 11:10:45 PM
O-201 Use a compass from the GT & Urban task guide:

"1. Successfully give the magnetic azimuth to a distant object +/- 5 degrees within 2 minutes. "

Honestly?  I was shocked when I saw that myself (1 Million years ago), since you can get yourself pretty
far off course with +/-5, especially if you shoot it far off and keep introducing the same error, but it is what it is.

Hopefully the GTL is smart and has more than 1 person shooting azimuths.  While I agree that +/- 5 degrees is a lot for land navigation, it is probably based more on the use of shooting an azimuth for an ELT signal, which really does not matter if it is +/-3 or +/-5 degrees.  It is what was produced by NESA back long ago and it does not seem to have really affected anyone.

Quote from: ol'fido on February 04, 2014, 11:04:37 PM
more precise compasses.

Oh another annoyance.  Difference between precise and accurate.  I think you really meant accurate compasses :)

LSThiker

Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 11:21:20 PM
That refers to the evaluation criteria to pass that task, not the level in which "CAP operates", as you described on a previous post.

And where is this standard for CAP operation stated since it is not the standard for CAP training?  A smart organization does not have two standards:  one that it trains to and one that it operates at. 

Eclipse

Quote from: LSThiker on February 04, 2014, 11:27:03 PM
Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 11:21:20 PM
That refers to the evaluation criteria to pass that task, not the level in which "CAP operates", as you described on a previous post.

And where is this standard for CAP operation stated since it is not the standard for CAP training?  A smart organization does not have two standards:  one that it trains to and one that it operates at.

+1

"That Others May Zoom"

Storm Chaser


Quote from: LSThiker on February 04, 2014, 11:27:03 PM
Quote from: Storm Chaser on February 04, 2014, 11:21:20 PM
That refers to the evaluation criteria to pass that task, not the level in which "CAP operates", as you described on a previous post.

And where is this standard for CAP operation stated since it is not the standard for CAP training?  A smart organization does not have two standards:  one that it trains to and one that it operates at.

No, but allowing for error that can easily be avoided is not conducive to safe and effective operations either. For example, if my compass is off by 3° and, while operating it I inadvertently induce an additional error of 3°, now I'm off by 6°. And the worst part is that I may not be aware of it.

I'm not going to continue beating this horse to death. The OP asked a question and I offered an opinion and suggestion. I think he has enough information to make his own decision.