CAP Talk

General Discussion => Membership => Topic started by: Cadet_Boi on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PM

Title: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: Cadet_Boi on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PM
I am a C/SrA supposed to promote tonight and earn my Wright Brothers. The only problem is on my track report, moral lead and encampment is N/A. Do I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank. I did go to the last meeting before this so should I raise my admin's attention?
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 04:48:23 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PMDo I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank.

No.  Encampment is required for Mitchell.

http://www.capmembers.com/media/cms/Super_Chart__2011_low__Copy_8371994AD16FE.pdf (http://www.capmembers.com/media/cms/Super_Chart__2011_low__Copy_8371994AD16FE.pdf)

Note the "no requirement" for Moral Leadership Character

(http://s31.postimg.org/wfq8p7xaj/std1.jpg)

http://www.capmembers.com/cadet_programs/stripes_to_diamonds/ (http://www.capmembers.com/cadet_programs/stripes_to_diamonds/)
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: Cadet_Boi on June 26, 2016, 04:53:42 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 04:48:23 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PMDo I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank.

No.  Encampment is required for Mitchell.
Suggestion? Should I raise awareness?
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: foo on June 26, 2016, 05:10:11 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:53:42 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 04:48:23 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PMDo I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank.

No.  Encampment is required for Mitchell.
Suggestion? Should I raise awareness?

Are you sure you know what N/A means? It means that the requirements are not applicable to this promotion.
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: Cadet_Boi on June 26, 2016, 05:26:52 PM
Quote from: neummy on June 26, 2016, 05:10:11 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:53:42 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 04:48:23 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PMDo I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank.

No.  Encampment is required for Mitchell.
Suggestion? Should I raise awareness?

Are you sure you know what N/A means? It means that the requirements are not applicable to this promotion.
It really usually said N/A for items I actually needed. Thanks though.
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 05:43:12 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 05:26:52 PM
It really usually said N/A for items I actually needed. Thanks though.

Assuming you're talking about the "Cadet Training and Promotions - Full Tracking Report" items indicated as "N/A" as mentioned above,
are "Not Applicable". 

These don't change per-cadet, nor would things you need be N/A.  Your best bet is to discuss this with the
leadership at your squadron.

With that said, and allowing you are a relatively new cadet, the day you're expecting to promote is not the first time
you should be noticing what you need.  This would be a good time to familiarize yourself with S-to-D.
Title: Re: Wright Brothers Achievement-Encampment or Admin Error?
Post by: foo on June 26, 2016, 06:43:40 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Boi on June 26, 2016, 05:26:52 PM
Quote from: neummy on June 26, 2016, 05:10:11 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:53:42 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on June 26, 2016, 04:48:23 PM
Quote from: Cadet_Bartz on June 26, 2016, 04:13:00 PMDo I have to go encampment in order to achieve this rank.

No.  Encampment is required for Mitchell.
Suggestion? Should I raise awareness?

Are you sure you know what N/A means? It means that the requirements are not applicable to this promotion.
It really usually said N/A for items I actually needed. Thanks though.

No it didn't, because that wouldn't make sense.