CAPID look. . . military???

Started by usafcap1, April 23, 2012, 11:40:11 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sgt. Fischer

Why? The ID is fine as it is.  ???


Stay Alert!
Stay Alive!
CAP Safety!

biomed441

Design change? Not necessary.  Quality? Eh... could be better. The gate guard at my squadron's meeting location did make a point that it looks like something that could have been printed in his grandmas basement. There are far bigger issues to be concerned with though.

mikebank

Less quality is correct, I just got my new CAP Id a few days ago and it is a lot thinner than last one. :'(
1st Lt Michael Bankson
Safety Officer
NCR-MO-089
Former EM1, U.S. Navy

rustyjeeper

The old cards were much better. My AAA card now is of better quatity than my CAPID card and that is a pretty sad thing especially when they both cost about the same annually to belong to.
I am embarassed to hand mine over to the gate guards, not because of the picture on it or anything except for the CHEEZINESS of the material it is printed on :o

mikebank

I guess with the budget problems, maybe with thinner id's, we can get a few more hours with planes in the air...maybe.....
1st Lt Michael Bankson
Safety Officer
NCR-MO-089
Former EM1, U.S. Navy

PHall

Do the new thinner cards do their job? Yes, they show that you are or were a member of the Civil Air Patrol.

End of discussion...

AngelWings

Quote from: PHall on May 06, 2012, 12:51:39 AM
Do the new thinner cards do their job? Yes, they show that you are or were a member of the Civil Air Patrol.

End of discussion...
Just to get the job done is exactly that. Getting the job done. Usually it is used to refer meeting the bare minimum. There is no extra effort to make it a decent job. I can iron my blues but not make the creases really appear. I can clean my brass but not make it shine. I can take a shower but not clean my hair properly. We shouldn't accept lackluster, especially considering how we are not a lackluster organization (sometimes contrary to CT belief).

rustyjeeper

Quote from: PHall on May 06, 2012, 12:51:39 AM
Do the new thinner cards do their job? Yes, they show that you are or were a member of the Civil Air Patrol.

End of discussion...


Depends which job you are referring to.
I will grant you that they identify us as members of the Civil Air Patrol, yes they do that.
The ID card also is an introduction at times to those who are unfamiliar with Civil Air Patrol as a bonafide organization. Say we present it to an airport official while searching for an ELT or we hand it to the gate guard at the base. Those people may never have seen anything other than the words Civil Air Patrol on a memo or access roster and their first impression of the organization is the person in uniform and the CHEESY piece of plastic issued as an ID card to our membership;  it does not make me think of a quality organization. That is MY opinion, and I must say that I aree with what Littleguy stated in a previous posting as well.
BTW(PHALL)-
I dont care for your "End of discussion....." attitude much and where to you get off telling me or anyone else when a discussion is over? I always though that was why there were moderators on here..... >:D

manfredvonrichthofen

There are a few different things that higher can do for us to make us a more professional appearance. A better ID for one, and it wouldn't be hard. Just get some better cards, and a better image for them, a bit higher quality ink and printer isn't hard either unless what they are doing is taking the flimsy plastic so they can feed a sheet through a standard desk printer and print eight people's cards at the same time. And that is exactly what they look like. And I can get better quality business cards from kinkos for CAP that I would be more proud of using than my ID.

BrannG

As a business owner and long time CAP volunteer and supporter, I have to say that CAP does need a more public, professional, and yes, military, image. So now the question is why. Before all your flamers and trolls and "wanna-be" callers start yelling, let me explain.

1) CAP is the ** OFFICIAL** Auxiliary of the United States Air Force, this does NOT mean we are military, however we are to respect the regulations of the United States Air Force, we wear the Air Force uniform, and perform non-combat missions on behalf of the United States Air Force. What we do, what we say, how we act - all reflects on our brothers and sisters in the Air Force. To this respect, we wear the Air Force uniform with pride, we keep to the regulations on how to wear that uniform, and most of our squadrons exist on US Air Force bases.

2) We provide federally mandated mission support and command on things like Disaster Relief, Search and Rescue, as well as Aerospace Education, a great cadet program, etc. In this fashion we should be more professional, and frankly, that begins and ends with image. It is the IMAGE that makes or breaks a brand. CAP is just that - a BRAND. Fact is, our public relations utterly sucks. We are a major organization, with over 60,000 members - yet the majority of the public knows NOTHING about the Civil Air Patrol. It wouldn't take much to change this. And we should in fact focus on doing just that - changing it. The more the public knows, the better our image, the more recruits we get, and funding gets much easier.. in the case of CAP, membership = funds, funds = better support, mission abilities, and flight time.

So in this essence, yes a more professional ID would go a long way. When your going house to house interviewing possible witnesses and gathering intel, handing someone this thin, crappy, and very unprofessional not to mention, something that screams "AM I FAKE?" should be changed. Should it be military - yes and no. I am a supporter of CAP getting a CAC ID, we are in fact the Auxiliary of the United States Air Force, and we are a "federal" level organization. What would a CAC do? Well, one that is clearly AUXILIARY would help the DOD track us, our numbers, our support abilities, where we are stationed, and over all access control. We perform missions for and act on behalf on the USAF, yet on look at our ID makes even the Security Force officers at the gate go.. "umm.. about that".

So even though a CAC would be nice, lets get real - not going to happen till CAP and the USAF work more hand in hand. This day -IS- coming and I know a certain person in active duty who works with CAP every day who knows that they are evaluating a more fruitful relationship. But till the Air Force decides we are CAC worthy, we still need a better ID. Clean, professional, easy to read and understand. One that shows we are legit. This would go along way in our image. Fact is, no one wants to put our current ID around our necks.. we're ashamed of them! We can get a better ID made at home! How sad is that? Hell, if I really wanted, I could design one online and order it with better results and have it be cost effective. So why is CAP giving us such crap cards?

I say redesign it all, top to bottom. And the rest of the PR stuff would go way to far off topic, so I may just start a thread for that. :P

2LT Brann, Gerald, CAP
SWR-TX-424


Lackland Cadet Squadron - SWR-TX-007 2012-Current
Kelly Composite Squadron - 42178 (Deactivated) 1994-2000
Cadet from 1994-1998
Senior Member from 1998-2000, 2012-Current
United States Air Force 2000-2006, 0-3

wuzafuzz

CAP could do a much better job with our branding, and presenting ourselves professionally.  Our ID card is not a major factor in that.  In fact I think it's adequate as-is. 

The only thing I would change is to copy a feature from my early 1980's U.S. Naval Sea Cadet Corps ID card.  That card included a statement explaining our limited Navy Exchange privileges and where the exchange staff could find supporting information in their manuals.  That was handy, so this teenaged goober didn't have to negotiate with exchange personnel when trying to buy uniforms or other minor items on our "drill weekends."

No one outside CAP has ever asked to see my CAP ID card.  In my CAP duties I have repeatedly visited military bases, attended multi-agency training classes, participated in planning meetings with public safety agencies, and have worked at real deal disasters.  None of those people cared about my CAP ID card.  Some of them got one of my CAP business cards.  Of course I showed my CAP ID and 101 card at CAP check-in, but those were CAP people.  Competency, professional demeanor, and correct uniform wear are more important than a snazzy ID card.

Incidentally, our CAP ID looks a lot nicer than the DBIDS card I use to enter a local Air Force base.

I would like to see us standardize our business cards.  More people see those, and they can leave a longer lasting impression than a rare, fleeting, flash of our ID card.
"You can't stop the signal, Mal."

Phillip

Getting the photo ID card was a step in the right direction.  Waaay back when all I needed to access the local AFB was my CAP ID (along with DL upon request), both Security Forces and the contract Security folks loved the card.  They said it looked a lot more professional (compared to the blue non-photo cards).

DBIDS came along and I no longer show my CAP ID at the gate, which is a good thing now that I have my new CAP ID.  While it looks a bit nicer than my last card, the move from plastic to stiff, laminated paper is, quite honestly, a slap in the face.  It's as if I printed it out at home and took it to Kinkos.   ::) 

Quote from: wuzafuzz on May 24, 2012, 12:55:06 AMIncidentally, our CAP ID looks a lot nicer than the DBIDS card I use to enter a local Air Force base.
I feel the opposite.  Simple, neat, professional, and distinctive from military IDs. 
Captain

a2capt

OTOH, they *know* what the DBIDS is at least. Our stiffened paper card ... I've been asked jokingly, but.. "do you all have to make these yourself, too?" by SF at the gate on entry, a couple times now...

The CyBorg is destroyed

I'm good with the design.  I remember the little flimsy blue/white ones from the '90s...I was almost ashamed to show those at the gate of a base.  These are worlds better.

However, it could be made of "sterner stuff," more like an ATM or credit card.

What the USCG Auxiliary has would be a good model for us...and for "wannabe watchers," theirs says "NON-MILITARY ID."
Exiled from GLR-MI-011

wuzafuzz

Quote from: Phillip on May 24, 2012, 02:48:56 PM
Quote from: wuzafuzz on May 24, 2012, 12:55:06 AMIncidentally, our CAP ID looks a lot nicer than the DBIDS card I use to enter a local Air Force base.
I feel the opposite.  Simple, neat, professional, and distinctive from military IDs.
For what its worth, DBIDS cards don't look the same at all bases.  I know they are dramatically different at two bases near me.  One looks similar to a CAC, the other looks like an Excel table gone mad.  I have the latter.
"You can't stop the signal, Mal."

arajca

Quote from: wuzafuzz on May 24, 2012, 07:07:51 PM
Quote from: Phillip on May 24, 2012, 02:48:56 PM
Quote from: wuzafuzz on May 24, 2012, 12:55:06 AMIncidentally, our CAP ID looks a lot nicer than the DBIDS card I use to enter a local Air Force base.
I feel the opposite.  Simple, neat, professional, and distinctive from military IDs.
For what its worth, DBIDS cards don't look the same at all bases.  I know they are dramatically different at two bases near me.  One looks similar to a CAC, the other looks like an Excel table gone mad.  I have the latter.
I just got my new formerly-psycho Excel card. It now looks the same as the other one that looks like a CAC.