Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 21, 2017, 01:16:02 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  General Discussion  |  Uniforms & Awards  |  Topic: "Corporate Uniform" Gone!!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 45 Print
Author Topic: "Corporate Uniform" Gone!!  (Read 90823 times)
Pingree1492
Forum Regular

Posts: 195

« on: November 07, 2009, 07:04:33 PM »

Looks like the NEC just passed a motion to get rid of the corporate uniform, effective Jan 2010!
 :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

This is the Blue Slack, blue epaulet uniform.

The Grey Slack/white shirt uniform will still be in effect.  Also, as a sidebar, they passed a motion allowing cadets over 18 that don't meet the weight standards to wear the Grey slack combo.
Logged
On CAP Hiatus- the U.S. Army is kindly letting me play with some of their really cool toys (helicopters) in far off, distant lands  :)
Lord of the North
Forum Regular

Posts: 111

« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2009, 07:05:44 PM »

Actual phase out date is Jan 2011.
Logged
Tim Medeiros
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 709
Unit: AZ-001

« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2009, 07:07:56 PM »

Seems like the clarified to immediately, all I know is I'm throwing a party!
Logged
TIMOTHY R. MEDEIROS, Lt Col, CAP
Member, National IT Functional User Group
1577/2811
pixelwonk
Alt-F4 pilot
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,108

« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2009, 07:11:28 PM »

the uniform has been rescinded immediately.  As with everything there is a phaseout period, which in this case is Jan 2011 being the mandatory no-wear date.

As an aside, black leather jackets and brown nametags were not originally created with this uniform, thus not rescinded.
Logged
JC004
[Insert Cool Title Here]
Global Moderator

Posts: 4,515

« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 07:25:29 PM »

Some sort of accident, I am sure.  They have never meant to simplify our uniforms.
Logged
jimmydeanno
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 4,155
Unit: ǝnƃoɹ

« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 07:30:17 PM »

Wow.  Of the two uniforms I thought the grey/white would be the one to go...

I know there are going to be quite a number of unhappy people who just dropped some coin on black sweaters, light weight jackets, service coats, etc...
Logged
If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law. - Winston Churchill
EMT-83
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,819

« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 07:32:59 PM »

NB just authorized black sweater, NEC does away with the entire uniform. Tell me this isn't a government operation!
Logged
Pylon
Administrator

Posts: 5,153
Unit: NER-NH-038

Michael Kieloch, Marketing Communications & PR Leadership
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2009, 07:33:59 PM »

NB just authorized black sweater, NEC does away with the entire uniform. Tell me this isn't a government operation!

The left hand doesn't even know there is a right hand, let alone what it's doing.  Welcome to CAP.
Logged
Michael F. Kieloch, Maj, CAP
Concord Composite Squadron, NH       
brenaud
Member

Posts: 73

« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2009, 07:37:17 PM »

Wow.  Of the two uniforms I thought the grey/white would be the one to go...

I know there are going to be quite a number of unhappy people who just dropped some coin on black sweaters, light weight jackets, service coats, etc...

Yeah, I was looking to start wearing that uniform & had been slowly assembling it.  But I guess I'm lucky, as all I'm really 'out' is a nametag and epaulet slides.  And now (since I have a flight cap and no authorized uniform with which to wear it) I guess I have a little more incentive to lose some weight & get into blues.
Logged
WILLIAM A. RENAUD, Lt Col, CAP
TNWG Director of Personnel & Administration
GRW #2699
Lancer
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 527

C3Designs, LLC
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2009, 07:40:28 PM »

I want my money back.
Logged
pixelwonk
Alt-F4 pilot
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,108

« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2009, 07:44:47 PM »

I want my money back.
Word.

Farewell, Tedda's Pimpin Uniform  :'(
Logged
brenaud
Member

Posts: 73

« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2009, 07:47:49 PM »

So, did they elaborate as to why?  (Obviously I missed the webcast). 
Logged
WILLIAM A. RENAUD, Lt Col, CAP
TNWG Director of Personnel & Administration
GRW #2699
JC004
[Insert Cool Title Here]
Global Moderator

Posts: 4,515

« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2009, 07:51:24 PM »

The left hand doesn't even know there is a right hand, let alone what it's doing.  Welcome to CAP.

WIN.
Logged
jacob
Member

Posts: 70

« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2009, 08:20:56 PM »

I am disappointed by this decision.  I was hoping (I know it was perhaps a long shot) that they'd drop the grooming standards for the CSU and go with that in favor of the grey and whites, especially as there were no grooming standards for the CSU when it was first released.

I know many had a bad opinion of the uniform due to how it was introduced.  And I do disagree that the double-breasted coat is not the best - especially with silver sleeve braids.  But the white aviator shirt and AF blue pants combination looks much more uniform than the white aviator shirt and any grey-ish pants combination - I've seen many say that it actually looks quite good!

Also, as many in this threat have already pointed out, a lot of members have spent a lot of money on these, and now have components they will be unable to reuse.

I am all for reducing CAP's uniform closet, I had just hoped it would be by dropping grey and whites instead.
Logged
PhotogPilot
Member

Posts: 94

« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2009, 08:23:17 PM »

Oh well, personally I liked the CSU, the Blue looked more uniform than gray, and I looked better in it. I wish they would standardize the gray slacks. All I am out is a couple of pairs of pants, a flight cap and blue epaulettes. I never shelled out the big bucks for the Service Coat. Maybe I'll get a couple more wearings out of it (I'm teaching at an SLS next weekend) before I pick up some gray trousers and epaulettes. I still have a gray name plate around here somewhere. I guess I'll go ahead and get a couple of polo shirts too.

Oh well, salute and excecute :-\
Logged
Nolan Teel
Forum Regular

Posts: 154
Unit: RMR-MT-001

« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2009, 08:41:26 PM »

So wait the TPU is gone???  Im upset not that its going away but for the members who spent hard earned money to purchase this uniform just to have it pulled away. 
Logged
Pingree1492
Forum Regular

Posts: 195

« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2009, 08:45:26 PM »

From the discussion, the reason behind dropping this uniform seems two-fold.  NOTE:  this is just my impression of the discussion, and may or may not represent the truth.

1) Many of the members expressed a desire to simplify our uniforms.  The fact that we have both the USAF uniform, the grey corporate uniform, and the blue corporate uniform all fill the same purpose.  So they wanted to go with one USAF-type uniform, and one corporate equivalent uniform.  The point about presenting a uniform, recognizable presence was raised a couple of times.

2) This uniform seems to have been a bit of a point of contention with the USAF.  Having a uniform that SO closely resembled an active duty Air Force officers uniform was confusing on a lot of occasions.  Which is the reason (again, my opinion based on their discussion) that this corporate uniform was dropped, and not the grey slacks uniform. 

Also, one of the items that they discussed shortly after approving dropping this uniform was clarifying who actually has the power, and ability to approve uniform changes, among other things.  Unfortunately, I missed most of that discussion, otherwise I would relate the discussion coming out of that end.  It does seem to be that they are quite aware of many of our general concerns in the uniform department- having so many combinations, and different ways to wear them, confusing regs, and constant, stupid little changes in everything that we wear.  Hopefully, the discussion today will lead to a better implemented uniform policy and guidance; however, I wasn't able to listen closely to what was raised so I'm not sure.  Did anyone else catch that portion of the conference?
Logged
On CAP Hiatus- the U.S. Army is kindly letting me play with some of their really cool toys (helicopters) in far off, distant lands  :)
Paper Pusher
Recruit

Posts: 8

« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2009, 08:58:42 PM »

I am really P.O.ed. I am one of the many senior members that does not meet the h/w requirements. I shelled out $260 for the coat not to speak of what the rest of the uniform costed. Who do I complain to when the NEC are the ones who commit waste and abuse of its membership.
Logged
arajca
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 4,159

« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2009, 09:04:02 PM »

If they are really only allowing 13 months to phase it out, what's the rush? Just about everything else was given three years.
Logged
Nolan Teel
Forum Regular

Posts: 154
Unit: RMR-MT-001

« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2009, 09:08:32 PM »

Ever get the feeling they just want it gone? and fast?  I really am upset that this is going to hurt our membership...  I guess after all we have seniors laying around that we can use.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 45 Print 
CAP Talk  |  General Discussion  |  Uniforms & Awards  |  Topic: "Corporate Uniform" Gone!!
 


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.13 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.53 seconds with 25 queries.