Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 26, 2017, 10:35:22 AM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Operations  |  Tools of the trade  |  Topic: Two options for PDF creation that don't break the bank
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All Print
Author Topic: Two options for PDF creation that don't break the bank  (Read 2733 times)
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #20 on: August 15, 2016, 12:19:41 PM »

Probably the major one still is Wing Banker, which could go away if CAP made better use of Sertifi.
If only someone had thought of that, and perhaps done a presentation this past weekend at the National Conference on how to do that.

Have they decided to pop for the additional licenses needed?
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

JeffDG
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,157

« Reply #21 on: August 15, 2016, 12:24:22 PM »

Probably the major one still is Wing Banker, which could go away if CAP made better use of Sertifi.
If only someone had thought of that, and perhaps done a presentation this past weekend at the National Conference on how to do that.

Have they decided to pop for the additional licenses needed?
Additional licenses not needed, just need to optimize the use of the ones they have.

Right now in my wing, we have all manner of forms that require signatures that we have taken entirely paperless via Sertifi signatures.
Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #22 on: August 15, 2016, 12:48:07 PM »

Right now in my wing, we have all manner of forms that require signatures that we have taken entirely paperless via Sertifi signatures.

What requires Seritfi that isn't financial in nature?  I mean, I guess it could be for anything from promo boards to
activity approval, right?  But doesn't that require the wing's license holder to always initiate those documents?
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

Fubar
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 592

« Reply #23 on: August 15, 2016, 06:25:21 PM »

Encampment applications. Plus it would be nice to see a list of my cadets who have signed up for encampment (also integrating CEAP).

Don't worry, NHQ is all over that:

Quote from: CAPP  52-24 1 June 2015
* An eServices-based system for
managing applications to attend
encampment will be available in
15. Until that time, encampments
are encouraged to use the hard
copy CAPF 31.

I'm sure it's coming any day now.
Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #24 on: August 15, 2016, 06:32:35 PM »

I'm sure it will be competed as soon as the mess of the curriculum has been fixed.
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

EMT-83
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,781

« Reply #25 on: August 15, 2016, 06:43:09 PM »

Actually...it is an admin fee for a DONATION.  You pay the $55, and Adobe donates a license to you at no additional cost.

Adobe also permits you to run a second copy on a personal machine once you pay for a license for the primary.

They don't donate it to you, they donate it to the organizaiton.  There's a difference, and it's only 4 copies per fiscal year, so irrelevant regardless.

Further to this, it's likely CAP is ineligible for those 4 copies: https://helpx.adobe.com/enterprise/help/non-profit.html
They might be able to get in under the corporate mantel, but it'll require a few phone calls, ones NHQ has probably (hopefully?)already made.

I looked into TS first when I started looking for alternatives to Acrobat.  Adobe is notoriously tight-fisted and married to their exorbitant pricing.
NHQ is already (presumably) paying for an OEM licensed copy with every computer they buy.

If you can get a copy of Acrobat XI for $55 good on 'ye, I don't think it's going to happen.

You are quite mistaken. I have TechSoup accounts for a squadron and another non-profit I'm associated with. Both have multiple Acrobat licenses, which were $45 at the time.
Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #26 on: August 15, 2016, 07:18:16 PM »

You are quite mistaken. I have TechSoup accounts for a squadron and another non-profit I'm associated with. Both have multiple Acrobat licenses, which were $45 at the time.

I don't have any way to dispute that one way or another other then to quote what is on their site. 
Depending on how long ago that was may be the difference.  Acrobat's site is indicating XI is only available
as a subscription, which would bring this back to the admin fee + the monthly charge.

However the CAP notebook on my desk is running a standalone version of XI Pro that was presumably
an OEM license from Dell with the machine.

If it works for you, or anyone else, great.
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

Mordecai
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 1,002
Unit: SI

« Reply #27 on: August 15, 2016, 07:45:22 PM »

PDFsam is a wonderful tool for splitting and merging PDFs on a grand scale.

http://www.pdfsam.org/
Logged
SarDragon
Global Moderator

Posts: 9,878
Unit: NAVAIRPAC

« Reply #28 on: August 15, 2016, 07:48:25 PM »

It still floors me that in 2016 we're still using applications that even require a signature, and anything requiring that kind of approval isn't going through eServices.

Actually, there's very little that really does - Promos and 120s are online now, which were the big thing.

Probably the major one still is Wing Banker, which could go away if CAP made better use of Sertifi.

Not all promos are done online. Duty performance is the only category done that way. Everything else - special appointments, mission related skills, professional appointments, and NCO and FO - is still done on a paper F2.
Logged
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret
JeffDG
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 3,157

« Reply #29 on: August 15, 2016, 08:01:16 PM »

Right now in my wing, we have all manner of forms that require signatures that we have taken entirely paperless via Sertifi signatures.

What requires Seritfi that isn't financial in nature?  I mean, I guess it could be for anything from promo boards to
activity approval, right?  But doesn't that require the wing's license holder to always initiate those documents?
Each wing has two licenses.  One for the wing admin to do financial stuff, one can be assigned to automated processes.  The code initiates the process not a person.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 08:10:38 PM by JeffDG » Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2016, 08:24:35 PM »

Not all promos are done online. Duty performance is the only category done that way. Everything else - special appointments, mission related skills, professional appointments, and NCO and FO - is still done on a paper F2.

Why >is< that?  The drop-downs are there, should be a no biggie.
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

SarDragon
Global Moderator

Posts: 9,878
Unit: NAVAIRPAC

« Reply #31 on: August 15, 2016, 09:20:46 PM »

Really? Guess I need a closer look.

Sent from my phone.

Logged
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #32 on: August 15, 2016, 09:21:47 PM »

Really? Guess I need a closer look.

They are there, but apparently no one below NHQ can use them.
Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

SarDragon
Global Moderator

Posts: 9,878
Unit: NAVAIRPAC

« Reply #33 on: August 16, 2016, 03:51:10 AM »

I see drop-down arrows, but they are all greyed out, so there's no telling what else is there. So, if it's not a Duty Performance promotion, it goes on a real Form 2.
Logged
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret
Jaison009
Seasoned Member

Posts: 263
Unit: SW-AR-040

« Reply #34 on: August 17, 2016, 01:21:56 AM »

I use CamScan on my phone to take a picture of whatever I want/need and then email it to myself as a pdf. Free way to create PDFs.

Between CAP, my business invoices, and my paperless records system for both, I live in .PDFs.
I'm at the tail end of fully digitizing unit records (mostly saving stuff now that are "nice to have" vs.
the personnel files that were doen a year ago - will this project ever end?)


CAP computers ship with Acrobat Pro, which is great, but it's $$$ if you're using your personal machine, or have a
CAP machine that for whatever reason doesn't have a .PDF editor, here's two good options.

FoxIT Phantom Standard
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf-editor/
This has all the features of Acrobat, and non-profits can purchase it for ~$50.
The "Optimized Scanned PDF" feature is really handy, especially for some of the "creatively" scanned
docs members produce.  You can sign, edit, type in and do all the normal PDF functions.

DocHub
http://dochub.com/

If you're using Google Docs, this is invaluable. You can generate .PDFs out of Docs, then type into or
sign them directly in Docs without having to download them first.  I use this every week for editing attendance logs.
The most needed functions are free, including signing .pdfs with an image file. There are some quantity limitations
per month, but I rarely if ever hit them.

And of course, a reminder that a lot of expensive applications can be purchased at lower prices through CCB:
http://ccbtechnology.com/about/nonprofit-technology-program/
Logged
Live2Learn
Seasoned Member

Posts: 377

« Reply #35 on: August 17, 2016, 10:35:03 AM »


One of the biggest mistakes I see people make, especially CAP members, is to send a Word document
upstream with a sig file embedded instead of rendering it into a .pdf.  That means anyone downstream
can easily change your document or snag your signature, and you can't guarantee the formatting when it's open.
(yes, people still use MS Works to view Word docs).

The same goes for "signed" .pdfs that aren't flattened as the final step - you can go in an pull out the sig very easily.
Always make sure to do that last step.

FWIW, neither step suggested above is theft or tinker proof.  Screen captures, copy and paste, etc. still work quite well with just an added step or two if someone (ANYONE) wants to commit fraud.  The digital world is much less secure than the bad 'ol days of paper and manila folders.  That old saw that says "locks only mark boundaries" could be reimagined to read  ".PDF formats only mark boundaries".  It would be just as true.
Logged
Eclipse
Too Much Free Time Award
***
Posts: 27,589

« Reply #36 on: August 17, 2016, 11:34:59 AM »

FWIW, neither step suggested above is theft or tinker proof.  Screen captures, copy and paste, etc. still work quite well with just an added step or two if someone (ANYONE) wants to commit fraud.  The digital world is much less secure than the bad 'ol days of paper and manila folders.  That old saw that says "locks only mark boundaries" could be reimagined to read  ".PDF formats only mark boundaries".  It would be just as true.

I don't disagree, but like locks they discourage the casual and less technical.

As to being less secure then paper, maybe, maybe not.  Properly managed , the cloud doesn't burn, take up space, or act as a burden.
Whether it's more or less secure depends on the vector and specifics of "security".

It's a lot better then a pile of folders or a room full of documents accessible to no one and searchable by flipping.

The biggest challenge for CAP, just as for everyone else, is the transition from "documents" to digital, include
the change of paradigm from the publication formats.

PDF images of forms are just skeuomorphic representations of an outdated concept. The universe is moving to "other",
which holds the data, but has no need for the 8-1/2" x 11" sheet of pretend paper the olde school arranges data on.

That will be a slow, decades if not centuries-long slog, as if nothing else , lawyers like their paper.

Logged

"Effort" does not equal "results".
The contents of this post are Copyright 2017 by eclipse. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

Майор Хаткевич
200,000th Post Author
Salty & Seasoned Contributor

Posts: 6,015
Unit: GLR-IL-049

« Reply #37 on: August 17, 2016, 12:47:39 PM »

Lawyers also don't like 8.5x11
Logged
Lord of the North
Forum Regular

Posts: 108

« Reply #38 on: August 17, 2016, 03:31:16 PM »

Another free PDF creator is found at http://www.cutepdf.com/  Anything you can print can be made into a PDF
Logged
SarDragon
Global Moderator

Posts: 9,878
Unit: NAVAIRPAC

« Reply #39 on: August 17, 2016, 04:41:34 PM »

Another free PDF creator is found at http://www.cutepdf.com/  Anything you can print can be made into a PDF

The problem with CutePDF, which I use a lot, is that the free version doesn't do scans, which is a big part of the solution in the other thread on the paper burden.
Logged
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All Print 
CAP Talk  |  Operations  |  Tools of the trade  |  Topic: Two options for PDF creation that don't break the bank
 


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.13 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.488 seconds with 20 queries.
click here to email me