Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2017, 08:10:41 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

 21 
 on: Today at 03:13:21 PM 
Started by jfkspotting - Last post by NIN
might be time to surplus this particular aircraft.

Unfortunately these kinds of maintenance times are not all that uncommon.  Over the last couple of years
my wing has had at least a couple aircraft that wound up being MX hangar queens for most of the respective FY
because of either parts availability, the complexity of the repair, or a combination of the two coupled with
NHQ expense approvals or a mishap report.

That 206 ain't that old.  We'll put beaucoup hrs on it :)

 22 
 on: Today at 03:10:16 PM 
Started by Adam B - Last post by Adam B
Ah. Thank you!

 23 
 on: Today at 03:09:29 PM 
Started by Adam B - Last post by Eclipse
The email bounced because that's a bad domain.

Wing email addresses in the .gov space are "@wwww.cap.gov"

Try this:  Rob.Baron@mawg.cap.gov

 24 
 on: Today at 03:08:36 PM 
Started by Adam B - Last post by MSG Mac
I live in Maryland,so no more information.  You might want to contact the MAWG PD Officer or the Westover Squadron directly

 25 
 on: Today at 03:04:50 PM 
Started by Adam B - Last post by Adam B
Yes, that's the one I linked to.
The one with the non-working contact.
In fact, it kind of looks like you just copied and pasted directly from that link.

Do you have any updated information on it?





 26 
 on: Today at 03:04:40 PM 
Started by jfkspotting - Last post by Eclipse
might be time to surplus this particular aircraft.

Unfortunately these kinds of maintenance times are not all that uncommon.  Over the last couple of years
my wing has had at least a couple aircraft that wound up being MX hangar queens for most of the respective FY
because of either parts availability, the complexity of the repair, or a combination of the two coupled with
NHQ expense approvals or a mishap report.

 27 
 on: Today at 02:55:38 PM 
Started by darkmatter - Last post by Adam B
Mighty expensive proposition to produce... creating dies for the medal, approval process, etc.

This.
As a whole, CAP has just over 30,000 senior members. Of those, I would be willing to say that less than 10% actually wear the Mess Dress uniform. I'll further speculate that a majority of those are probably wearing military medals (that's what I've seen, at least).
I think you're left less than 2000 potential consumers, most of whom are satisfied by the current selection; there's just not much business sense in committing resources to developing more.


Now, that's not to say that I wouldn't LIKE there to be more.
I recently wanted to buy a set of medals for my shadowbox and was disappointed to see that not all the ribbons had medals available... but I just stuck a ribbon rack in there instead and moved on.

I own one medal, just in case I ever need to wear the CSFU... Which so far, I never have. 



 28 
 on: Today at 02:49:14 PM 
Started by Adam B - Last post by MSG Mac
Massachusetts
15-16 Jul 17
 Westover ARB, MA
 MSgt Rob Baron
Rob.Baron@mawgcap.gov
(413) 885-86

 29 
 on: Today at 02:49:05 PM 
Started by jfkspotting - Last post by Live2Learn
might be time to surplus this particular aircraft.

 30 
 on: Today at 02:34:10 PM 
Started by T8nker - Last post by Live2Learn
...For disaster relief, we could airdrop packages with ELTs attached to them and then send ground teams to find them and distribute them. He also said that for missing planes, we could airdrop packages with notes saying they were found, and to stay put until a SAR team got to them.

CAPR 60-1
2-1. Basic Rules.
b. ...dropping of objects (except to save a life) from CAP aircraft [is] prohibited.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.13 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.179 seconds with 15 queries.