Main Menu

NEC Meeting

Started by CAP_truth, May 04, 2012, 08:19:22 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fyrfitrmedic

Quote from: a2capt on May 07, 2012, 08:53:10 PM
The "auto correction fixes" are getting down right amusing. Almost as if it's being done on purpose.

I'm convinced that the authors of the autocorrect algorithms are epic trolls.
MAJ Tony Rowley CAP
Lansdowne PA USA
"The passion of rescue reveals the highest dynamic of the human soul." -- Kurt Hahn

EMT-83

There was the time I sent a message to my boss about the "thing" she wanted me to look at. I don't know what I typed, but it auto-corrected to the "thong" she wanted me to look at.

Ned

As promised, here is the Executive Summary for the NEC Meeting as posted on the NHQ website.

They are still working on the videos, but they should be posted shortly.

Ned Lee
Member at Large, BoG

arajca

Important note:

The TTT is dead! If I read the Executive Summary correctly. Item 16A. Page 2. Middle. (Ned, please advise if I am correct)

The Prop and Triangle - without the lettering band - was approved.

Other comments to follow...

NCRblues

Quote from: arajca on May 11, 2012, 05:16:48 PM
Important note:

The TTT is dead! If I read the Executive Summary correctly. Item 16A. Page 2. Middle. (Ned, please advise if I am correct)

The Prop and Triangle - without the lettering band - was approved.

Other comments to follow...

Nope. It was adopted straight out. Triangle thing is alive and OFFICALY WELL.
In god we trust, all others we run through NCIC

arajca

Looking at the graphic in the Executive Summary, it is NOT the TTT. If they Executive summary is accurate, then the TTT, as railed against here in many signature images, has been around for a LONG time, not merely a few years. The graphic presented is at the heart of the CAP seal, MajComm patch and Emblem and does not have the light blue band with lettering.

The first graphic is what is in the summary. The second is the TTT.


RogueLeader

Quote from: NCRblues on May 11, 2012, 05:22:20 PM
Quote from: arajca on May 11, 2012, 05:16:48 PM
Important note:

The TTT is dead! If I read the Executive Summary correctly. Item 16A. Page 2. Middle. (Ned, please advise if I am correct)

The Prop and Triangle - without the lettering band - was approved.

Other comments to follow...

Nope. It was adopted straight out. Triangle thing is alive and OFFICALY WELL.

No lettering band, plus the triangle is blue, not silver with blue lettering.
WYWG DP

GRW 3340

FlyTiger77

Quote from: RogueLeader on May 11, 2012, 06:04:31 PM
Quote from: NCRblues on May 11, 2012, 05:22:20 PM
Quote from: arajca on May 11, 2012, 05:16:48 PM
Important note:

The TTT is dead! If I read the Executive Summary correctly. Item 16A. Page 2. Middle. (Ned, please advise if I am correct)

The Prop and Triangle - without the lettering band - was approved.

Other comments to follow...

Nope. It was adopted straight out. Triangle thing is alive and OFFICALY WELL.

No lettering band, plus the triangle is blue, not silver with blue lettering.

I wonder if the NEC realized that by that action they would kill a sizable percentage of the discussion here on CAP Talk? The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again!

JACK E. MULLINAX II, Lt Col, CAP

RogueLeader

No, we still have uniforms to discuss.
WYWG DP

GRW 3340

jks19714

Next up, paisley berets!  >:D
Diamond Flight 88
W3JKS/AAT3BF/AAM3EDE/AAA9SL
Assistant Wing Communications Engineer

RogueLeader

Quote from: jks19714 on May 11, 2012, 06:49:43 PM
Next up, paisley berets!  >:D

They would have to be sold exclusively by vanguard as they would be cap distinctive.
WYWG DP

GRW 3340

Larry Mangum

Well, we may have to see what happens to the permanent CAP facilities at NESA, now that the funds paying for the upgrades has been stripped and given to the regions.
Larry Mangum, Lt Col CAP
DCS, Operations
SWR-SWR-001

FlyTiger77

Quote from: jks19714 on May 11, 2012, 06:49:43 PM
Next up, paisley berets!  >:D

Rasberry berets and then Prince can perform at the National Conference.
JACK E. MULLINAX II, Lt Col, CAP

James Shaw

Quote from: FlyTiger77 on May 11, 2012, 07:03:09 PM
Quote from: jks19714 on May 11, 2012, 06:49:43 PM
Next up, paisley berets!  >:D

Rasberry berets and then Prince can perform at the National Conference.

The kind you buy in a second hand store?????
Jim Shaw
USN: 1987-1992
GANG: 1996-1998
CAP:2000 - SER-SO
USCGA:2019 - BC-TDI/National Safety Team
SGAUS: 2017 - MEMS Academy State Director (Iowa)

FlyTiger77

#74
Quote from: caphistorian on May 11, 2012, 07:29:11 PM
Quote from: FlyTiger77 on May 11, 2012, 07:03:09 PM
Quote from: jks19714 on May 11, 2012, 06:49:43 PM
Next up, paisley berets!  >:D

Rasberry berets and then Prince can perform at the National Conference.

The kind you buy in a second hand store?????

Exactly. And the 30 and under set have absolutely no idea what we are talking about. Of course, I am not sure I know what a Justin Beiber is, so I guess it evens out.

On a totally different subject, thanks, Ned, for posting the ExSum.
JACK E. MULLINAX II, Lt Col, CAP

Spaceman3750

Quote from: Larry Mangum on May 11, 2012, 06:54:08 PM
Well, we may have to see what happens to the permanent CAP facilities at NESA, now that the funds paying for the upgrades has been stripped and given to the regions.

Yeah, that's pretty worrisome.

lordmonar

Quote from: Spaceman3750 on May 11, 2012, 07:33:06 PM
Quote from: Larry Mangum on May 11, 2012, 06:54:08 PM
Well, we may have to see what happens to the permanent CAP facilities at NESA, now that the funds paying for the upgrades has been stripped and given to the regions.

Yeah, that's pretty worrisome.
Is $10K going to put that big of a crimp in the facilities.
PATRICK M. HARRIS, SMSgt, CAP

Larry Mangum

It is not $10K but rather $10K times 8 regions ($80K).
Larry Mangum, Lt Col CAP
DCS, Operations
SWR-SWR-001

FW

Quote from: Spaceman3750 on May 11, 2012, 07:33:06 PM
Quote from: Larry Mangum on May 11, 2012, 06:54:08 PM
Well, we may have to see what happens to the permanent CAP facilities at NESA, now that the funds paying for the upgrades has been stripped and given to the regions.

Yeah, that's pretty worrisome.

I wouldn't worry about it.  Governance change is comming soon.  The "new" powers that be may change things by next year...

Ned

Quote from: Spaceman3750 on May 11, 2012, 07:33:06 PM
Quote from: Larry Mangum on May 11, 2012, 06:54:08 PM
Well, we may have to see what happens to the permanent CAP facilities at NESA, now that the funds paying for the upgrades has been stripped and given to the regions.

Yeah, that's pretty worrisome.

Actually, the requested funds for the regional training facility were indeed allocated and the $80,000 in payments to the regions was restricted to CP and represents monies above and beyond the needs of the regional training facilities.

Another way to look at it was that VG funding stream is larger than was originally expected, and could not reasonably be spent just on the regional training facilities.

Once again, this is the volunteer leadership doing the responsible thing and attempting to honor the original intent of the funding "fence" - supporting not only the regional training facilities, but also allocating significant "new" funding for CP.  And to their credit, it was passed down the chain and not simply spent at the NHQ level.

Win-win.