Wingman Support Day Materials Posted

Started by Ed Bos, September 13, 2019, 09:14:56 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ed Bos

The Wingman Support Day materials for October are posted at https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/members/wingman-support-day.

I know from the other thread (http://captalk.net/index.php?topic=24467.0) that not everyone is excited about this program, but I think it's useful to sit down every year and let our members consider how we can take care of each other.
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

etodd

#1
Feel Good Programs that Hdqs can hold up and say "We did something".  Yet so many members will have others plans that night.

I keep wondering about the mentor program we are suppose to have?  I've only been around three years but I have a couple guys in my Squadron that I have always considered my mentors. I know I can ask anything or discuss anything off the record and either get answers or guidance. From personal issues to CAP issues.

And now I'm trying to give back. I have a couple new members I'm helping to guide through the system and also working them through Mission Scanner now. I hope as we become friends they will feel comfortable in knowing they can seek my help if needed.

I'm a grass roots guy. National programs can set some policy, but it's down here at one on one level where you can develop those relationships that can make a difference in the lives of fellow members. It has to come from the heart. Can't teach that on a PowerPoint.

JMHO
"Don't try to explain it, just bow your head
Breathe in, breathe out, move on ..."

Gunsotsu

Quote from: etoddYet so many members will have others plans that night.

Easy fix, don't attend that night.

These needless stand-down days? Rob members of valuable time that could be spent dealing with other issues that actually affect their squadron, rather than the national chaplin's current pet project. 

Ed Bos

Quote from: Gunsotsu on September 14, 2019, 01:37:04 AM
Quote from: etoddYet so many members will have others plans that night.

Easy fix, don't attend that night.

These needless stand-down days? Rob members of valuable time that could be spent dealing with other issues that actually affect their squadron, rather than the national chaplin's commander's current pet project.

Fixed that for you.

And I'm interested in hearing about your background and expertise in this area. How did you come to learn about wellness and the fruitlessness of this type of intervention?
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

CAP9907

you folks are something else...

CAP HQ identifies a potential issue and tries to address it.

Members: how dare they..




CAP NHQ ignores a potential issue.

Members: how dare they ignore this.



21 yrs of service

Our Members Code of Conduct can be found here:   http://captalk.net/index.php?topic=13.0

jeders

Quote from: CAP9907 on September 16, 2019, 03:59:41 AM
you folks are something else...

CAP HQ identifies a potential issue and tries to address it.

Members: how dare they..




CAP NHQ ignores a potential issue.

Members: how dare they ignore this.

Welcome to CAP Talk; located at the intersection of bandwidth and boredom.  >:D
If you are confident in you abilities and experience, whether someone else is impressed is irrelevant. - Eclipse

NIN

Where outrage and apathy occupy the same airspace
Darin Ninness, Col, CAP
I have no responsibilities whatsoever
I like to have Difficult Adult Conversations™
The contents of this post are Copyright © 2007-2024 by NIN. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

etodd

QuoteWhere outrage and apathy occupy the same airspace

Neither for me. Give Hdqs an "A for Effort" ... but some of this stuff just tickles me:

QuoteSleep Card Game Sleep for Kids - Teaching Kids the Importance of Sleep

For KIDS is correct. Its on a second grade level. Our Cadets would be embarrassed by this. Who put this stuff together? Do they know we start as teens? That one item alone makes me wonder if whoever put this together knows who CAP members are.
"Don't try to explain it, just bow your head
Breathe in, breathe out, move on ..."

Eclipse

This falls square into "Flat Tire"...

1 - Recognizing a tire is flat does not give one the skills, knowledge, or ability to repair it.

2 - Attempts to repair a flat tire by someone who is unqualified can result in additional damage, sometimes more serious than the flat itself.

"That Others May Zoom"

Ed Bos

Quote from: etodd on September 16, 2019, 02:58:38 PM

For KIDS is correct. Its on a second grade level. Our Cadets would be embarrassed by this. Who put this stuff together? Do they know we start as teens? That one item alone makes me wonder if whoever put this together knows who CAP members are.

I did. I appreciate the feedback. I thought it would be easy to understand, that's why I chose to include it. The rest of the team didn't see the same concern you have, and I'll be sure to pass it on.

Quote from: Eclipse on September 16, 2019, 03:22:34 PM
This falls square into "Flat Tire"...

1 - Recognizing a tire is flat does not give one the skills, knowledge, or ability to repair it.

2 - Attempts to repair a flat tire by someone who is unqualified can result in additional damage, sometimes more serious than the flat itself.

Qualified to make that assessment, eh? I'm totally interested to hear your professional opinion on the matter. Fitness trainer? Physician? Therapist? Psychologist? What background are you calling upon to make your assessment?

We have qualified people on the team who put this together, and we're always eager to collaborate with folks who have an interest in making programs better.
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

Gunsotsu

Quote from: Ed BosWe have qualified people on the team who put this together

Cite your sources.
Who are they?
What are their qualifications?
What experience do they have disseminating complex mental health topics to untrained, unqualified volunteers for wide dissemination?



Ned

Quote from: Gunsotsu on September 17, 2019, 04:29:55 PM

Cite your sources.
Who are they?
What are their qualifications?
What experience do they have disseminating complex mental health topics to untrained, unqualified volunteers for wide dissemination?

Instead of playing "gotcha," you might consider taking a look at the actual Wingman Support Day page on the CAP website, where the committee members are listed.

In particular, take a look at this guy, CDR Thomas Janisko, the command surgeon for the US Army Corps of Engineers and Director of the Corps of Engineers CISM Team, which " provides peer support, operational stress control, and resiliency training to all employees.".  He might know a thing or two about resiliency.  (He is also a dedicated CAP member.)


Who, along with dedicated CAP chaplains, senior leaders, and CP specialists developed this program.  All of whom know a thing or two about training and working with volunteers.


I understand it is harder to actually look at the materials and the qualifications of the personnel rather than placing a response such as yours here on CAP Talk, but sometimes it might be worth the effort.



Gunsotsu

It isn't "gotcha," Ned, it's information that needs to be presented to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the information being presented is doing so from an understanding of child psychological issues and need. Nothing in CDR Janisko's biography suggests that he is in any way qualified to speak on the topic for anyone other than adults in his realm. Cadets (children) are not little adults, their psychological needs are vastly different, even more so when you consider that a 12 year old and an 18 year old may as well be entirely different species from a mental health standpoint (not to say physiologically).

I've said my piece. It was a waste of time last year, it's still a waste of time this year. I'll be taking a mental health day the night it's required (without any supporting documentation authorizing such).   

Luis R. Ramos

Ned, not only those arguments that have been presented. But as a retired library teacher at the public school level, and college I always taught "cite your sources." And expected to see a quote whether it was a professor or other material. None of this information is stated in the support material without really digging. So in effect CAP is asking us to accept this at face value! If they would have included this info in all materials we are being asked to use you would not see as much criticism!
Squadron Safety Officer
Squadron Communication Officer
Squadron Emergency Services Officer

etodd

#14
I have no qualms or questions about the folks that created the materials. I'm sure its great stuff.  My concerns are always "grass roots".

I'll give you an example.  I have a grandson who has some autism. Met with his teacher to discuss all the issues and see what we and they would be doing. There are protocols and things already setup in the school board system here for all this. We had done our research and knew everything ahead of time.  So we meet with the teacher and start discussing things and she is clueless, we wind up telling her everything, and so many things she doesn't understand because she will not admit ignorance.  She then proceeds to inform us that she is certified/something in dealing with autism in the classroom. We dig more to find out about her qualifications and it turns out she just went to a weekend seminar that included a 3 hour class on autism. They gave her a little certificate, and so now she thinks she is an expert. Sound familiar?

Send out all the info you like. But add lots of disclaimers to it. CAP member reading through a PowerPoint or attending a workshop while stuffing down donuts and coffee .. does NOT make them qualified to deal with serious issues, with Cadets especially. As I said in the other thread, never get between a Cadet and the parents on these issues. Its their job.
"Don't try to explain it, just bow your head
Breathe in, breathe out, move on ..."

Larry Mangum

The military as a whole is grappling with reaching out to fellow sailors, soldiers, marines and airman as they cope with the stresses they are under. NHQ, is simply trying to do the same for our fellow CAP members.  Is it a perfect program, of course not, there is not a perfect program nor will there ever be one. However, even if it is not perfect, it is better than doing nothing. If the program saves one cadet's or senior member's life, then the entire program has been worth it, in my humble opinion.

If you find faults within the program, then submit recommendations on how to improve the program through the proper channels. I work in the software industry and manage a development team. We are an agile team, which means we iterate, no release is expected to be perfect, but we keep iterating and improving upon the solution, until it meets the needs of the customer or business unit.

I challenge each of you to be part of the solution, not part of the problem.
Larry Mangum, Lt Col CAP
DCS, Operations
SWR-SWR-001

TheSkyHornet

The military is also the culprit/inducer on depression and suicides related to military personnel—particularly in regard to deployments/family separation, loss, culture, and other work-related stressors, not to forget a number of health-related problems (i.e., veterans).

It's a remarkably different age group that has a significant difference in life experience and life-related stressors. While there may be commonalities (i.e., we all have stressful deadlines, family arguing, etc.), youth depression and military depression are vastly different and must be treated as such.

So I think to say "Well, the military is doing it; why shouldn't we" is inappropriate for this type of content.

The rate of suicides has skyrocketed in the last two decades in the United States, upwards of a 21-33% increase for ages 15 to 64. That 15-year-old needs to be targeted much differently than the 64-year-old in regard to coping mechanisms and day-to-day life. Those ages are worlds apart in what stresses them out and how they perceive the universe around them.

Ed Bos

Quote from: Luis R. Ramos on September 17, 2019, 06:49:27 PM
Ned, not only those arguments that have been presented. But as a retired library teacher at the public school level, and college I always taught "cite your sources." And expected to see a quote whether it was a professor or other material. None of this information is stated in the support material without really digging. So in effect CAP is asking us to accept this at face value! If they would have included this info in all materials we are being asked to use you would not see as much criticism!

Hey Luis, I put the references on a slide in the presentation. It's not APA or MLA, but we're not obfuscating that the material came from somewhere else.
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

Ed Bos

Quote from: Gunsotsu on September 17, 2019, 06:36:46 PM
It isn't "gotcha," Ned, it's information that needs to be presented to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the information being presented is doing so from an understanding of child psychological issues and need. Nothing in CDR Janisko's biography suggests that he is in any way qualified to speak on the topic for anyone other than adults in his realm. Cadets (children) are not little adults, their psychological needs are vastly different, even more so when you consider that a 12 year old and an 18 year old may as well be entirely different species from a mental health standpoint (not to say physiologically).

I've said my piece. It was a waste of time last year, it's still a waste of time this year. I'll be taking a mental health day the night it's required (without any supporting documentation authorizing such).

I'm curious why you chose to invoke the standard for a criminal sentencing in this case?
EDWARD A. BOS, Lt Col, CAP
Email: edward.bos(at)orwgcap.org
PCR-OR-001

Mitchell 1969

Quote from: Ed Bos on September 17, 2019, 08:07:42 PM
Quote from: Gunsotsu on September 17, 2019, 06:36:46 PM
It isn't "gotcha," Ned, it's information that needs to be presented to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the information being presented is doing so from an understanding of child psychological issues and need. Nothing in CDR Janisko's biography suggests that he is in any way qualified to speak on the topic for anyone other than adults in his realm. Cadets (children) are not little adults, their psychological needs are vastly different, even more so when you consider that a 12 year old and an 18 year old may as well be entirely different species from a mental health standpoint (not to say physiologically).

I've said my piece. It was a waste of time last year, it's still a waste of time this year. I'll be taking a mental health day the night it's required (without any supporting documentation authorizing such).

I'm curious why you chose to invoke the standard for a criminal sentencing in this case?

He didn't. The criminal standard is not "beyond a shadow of a doubt," as he wrote. It is "beyond a reasonable doubt."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________
Bernard J. Wilson, Major, CAP

Mitchell 1969; Earhart 1971; Eaker 1973. Cadet Flying Encampment, License, 1970. IACE New Zealand 1971; IACE Korea 1973.

CAP has been bery, bery good to me.