Does anyone know where I can find published numbers on the percent of cadets who achieve each of the Milestone awards? I know the Mitchell is known as 15% universally, but I don't know the numbers for the Earhart, Eaker, and Spaatz.
I know that Spaats is -1%. :o
Ask the Knowledgebase (https://civilairpatrol.freshdesk.com/support/home).
I believe Earheart is 10%, Eaker is 2% (I know that) and Spaatz is one half of a percent (0.005%)
Quote from: Capmonkey on June 27, 2019, 04:34:13 PM
I believe Earheart is 10%, Eaker is 2% (I know that) and Spaatz is one half of a percent (0.005%) - either .5%, or .005
FTFY
Quote from: SarDragon on June 28, 2019, 03:42:24 AM
Quote from: Capmonkey on June 27, 2019, 04:34:13 PM
I believe Earheart is 10%, Eaker is 2% (I know that) and Spaatz is one half of a percent (0.005%) - either .5%, or .005
FTFY
Thanks
Mitchell - 15%
Earhart - 5%
Eaker - 2%
Spaatz - .5%
From NHQ CP Staff
And I'd imagine Wright Bros is close to 50% given that Curry is only, like, ~83%
Quote from: jebaugh on June 30, 2019, 09:10:41 PM
Mitchell - 15%
Earhart - 5%
Eaker - 2%
Spaatz - .5%
From NHQ CP Staff
And I'd imagine Wright Bros is close to 50% given that Curry is only, like, ~83%
That is truly disappointing. It should be closer to 95%, IMHO.
Quote from: SarDragon on June 30, 2019, 10:17:29 PM
Quote from: jebaugh on June 30, 2019, 09:10:41 PM
Mitchell - 15%
Earhart - 5%
Eaker - 2%
Spaatz - .5%
From NHQ CP Staff
And I'd imagine Wright Bros is close to 50% given that Curry is only, like, ~83%
That is truly disappointing. It should be closer to 95%, IMHO.
Should be. Perhaps Nin can give us the actual statistics on the national level. I would love to know all of those statistics and those at the Group and Wing level.
Assuming you could get them, how useful would they be when the data isn't "clean"?
Without removing the empty shirts, and somehow accounting for annual churn
(which is in the 40+ percentile) the numbers are essentially useless.
Raw percentages might be conversationally interesting, but won't tell you much about the
health of the program.
For that matter, what is considered "success"?