One of the performance requirements is to list 10 necessary items for a new cadet squadron. Really?? That is way too much. And I don't want to be one of those people who list every tiny item (i.e 1. work gloves, 2. safety goggles. I just put them under safety supplies). Any items or tips for the SDA, in general, would be appreciated.
Does your squadron has a Logistics Officer? If not, maybe a Safety Officer or a Cadet Programs Officer.
Did you talk to either?
Any could have been your primary sources of information
10 is a very short list compared to the number of things actually needed (or nice to have).
Complaining on the internet that you don't like a very realistic task and thought exercise is not a good quality for a cadet officer.
As a cadet officer, you should have more than a passing familiarity with the regs. One purpose of the SDAs is to help cadet officers understand what it takes to actually run a squadron.
Consider CAPR 20-3(I).
Quote from: Omen on August 02, 2017, 04:24:49 PM
One of the performance requirements is to list 10 necessary items for a new cadet squadron. Really?? That is way too much. And I don't want to be one of those people who list every tiny item (i.e 1. work gloves, 2. safety goggles. I just put them under safety supplies). Any items or tips for the SDA, in general, would be appreciated.
You contradict your own statements in two sentences. Impressive.
What is more impressive is that here most seniors say "admonish in private." Yet send messages like these.
I thought telling this cadet his statement was negative. Refrained from doing so. As I have been told "doing so in public is not cool."
Impressive. Do as I say, not as I do...
Quote from: Luis R. Ramos on August 03, 2017, 11:43:48 AM
What is more impressive is that here most seniors say "admonish in private." Yet send messages like these.
I thought telling this cadet his statement was negative. Refrained from doing so. As I have been told "doing so in public is not cool."
Impressive. Do as I say, not as I do...
It's a cadet officer whining about a simple assignment...nothing to admonish in private.
Should not make any difference. From now on, I will stuck my tongue at anyone that says "admonish in private."
This will be my icon:
:P
Shouldn't you be admonishing him in private?
Eclipse, he gave me the authority to admonish him publicly.
For you, Eclipse, I will not stick my tongue at you. I respect you too much.
;)
Quote from: Luis R. Ramos on August 04, 2017, 03:07:37 PM
Eclipse, he gave me the authority to admonish him publicly.
For you, Eclipse, I will not stick my tongue at you. I respect you too much.
;)
I see that your focus is here:
QuoteLuis R. Ramos (http://captalk.net/index.php?action=profile;u=4395)
Salty & Seasoned Contributor
AAAaaaaahhHHHH! He found me! He OUTED me!
Now I cannot hide!
And we're done here, too.
Click.