What Are Your Thoughts On...

Started by 356cadet, August 08, 2008, 04:06:07 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

356cadet

Considering NHQ passes the ACU in about 2014.

DC

Quote from: 356cadet on August 08, 2008, 10:33:49 PM
Considering NHQ passes the ACU in about 2014.
How does that affect the idea of transitioning to DCUs? Even if, God forbid, it we don't get the ABU before 2014, I don't see DCUs being any easier to get ahold of than BDUs, and it would be a little strange for the 85% that doesn't live in or near a desert...

stratoflyer

I'd be the first at complaining about the aesthetics of the BDU's. But thinking rationally, we really have no need for the subdued stuff. Remember that the Air Force has a say in our uniforms. Besides, who really cares how it looks as long as it has a professional look to it and is worn correctly. Our uniforms are not as necessary to our missions as the military's.

However, it'd be real cool if we did have subdues insignias!
"To infinity, and beyond!"

Eduardo Rodriguez, 2LT, CAP

MIKE

Quote from: 356cadet on August 08, 2008, 10:33:49 PM
Considering NHQ passes the ACU in about 2014.

ABU Airman Battle Uniform, not Army Combat Uniform.

Make up a plate of flag blue on gray.  If you can, how about some tapes that are flag blue on ABU pattern?
Mike Johnston

RiverAux

QuoteBut thinking rationally, we really have no need for the subdued stuff.
On the other hand, there is no rational reason for the bright name tapes either.  A subdued name tape that says Civil Air Patrol separates us just as much from the Air Force as does subdued name tapes that separate the Air Force from the Army from the Marines.  Even more so when the use of Civil Air Patrol doesn't actually imply any sort of link to the Air Force in the first place. 

That being the case, it is a strictly esthetic choice and that being the case, I prefer several of the suggestions made here over the year for a darker background to the tapes, etc. but still with white letters. 

356cadet

Quote from: MIKE on August 09, 2008, 12:56:53 AM
Quote from: 356cadet on August 08, 2008, 10:33:49 PM
Considering NHQ passes the ACU in about 2014.

ABU Airman Battle Uniform, not Army Combat Uniform.

Make up a plate of flag blue on gray.  If you can, how about some tapes that are flag blue on ABU pattern?

Sorry, was thinking of Airman Combat Uniform (duiy!). I'll go ahead and render up some ABU cloth ranks, since I've gotten the request a couple of times before... I believe.

Jolt

The thing I like about our BDUs (over subdued insignia of any kind) is that I can easily read it.  I always have to squint when I see someone with subdued patches and I've never been able to read them until I'm three feet away.

Besides, it would just give cadets more of a reason to miss salutes!

smj58501

Quote from: 1st Lt FAT and FUZZY on August 08, 2008, 09:33:32 AM
Let's see... we wear woodland camo... and then put on bright orange vests...

Always has been an interesting paradox
Sean M. Johnson
Lt Col, CAP
Chief of Staff
ND Wing CAP

DC

Quote from: Jolt on August 10, 2008, 05:18:24 AM
The thing I like about our BDUs (over subdued insignia of any kind) is that I can easily read it.  I always have to squint when I see someone with subdued patches and I've never been able to read them until I'm three feet away.

Besides, it would just give cadets more of a reason to miss salutes!
There is no reason, with normal or properly corrected vision, that you should not be able to tell the difference between an officer and an Airman or NCO from saluting distance. You may not be able to tell from across a large room, but why would you need to?

Subdued tapes and insignia would be nice, will we get them? Not likely, unless we do some serious bridge mending with the Air Force, and that is not going to happen overnight. The best we can realistically hope for is something slightly less garish than ultramarine and white, maybe gray and navy, or navy and white, or something like that.

DNall

Just to be clear here, something like 1% of the AF has anything like a ground combat job. Even the Army is not remotely made up of ground combat folks. All military services are majority support troops, who have no direct practical need of cammo. Even considering the people that do engage in direct ground combat, they aren't doing that but a very tiny percentage of the time when deployed, and are not deployed most of the time.

My point is the ABU/ACU/BDU/etc are all general utility uniforms. None of them are very good camo, and outside of wearing an orange jumpsuit to combat I'd argue that camo uniforms are pretty meaningless in an urban environment anyway.

The whole reason everyone in the military (and CAP too) wears combat utility uniforms is to share solidarity with the deployed combat force - ie even though you're sweeping the floor in Kansas it in some way effects combat ops in Iraq, or by doing these SaR missions w/ a Cessna we save the AF money that they turn around into better training/equip/etc that makes them stronger/better. Now, maybe in some ways there is some little element of truth in some of those connections, and maybe there isn't. The point is less about the actual support than the psychological solidarity that contributes to motivating people to do their jobs well.

flyerthom

Quote from: 1st Lt FAT and FUZZY on August 08, 2008, 09:33:32 AM
Let's see... we wear woodland camo... and then put on bright orange vests...

That's so you can git yer deer while yer out der:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb9yhhflmvY
TC

JayT

Quote from: RiverAux on August 09, 2008, 03:17:02 AM
QuoteBut thinking rationally, we really have no need for the subdued stuff.
On the other hand, there is no rational reason for the bright name tapes either.  A subdued name tape that says Civil Air Patrol separates us just as much from the Air Force as does subdued name tapes that separate the Air Force from the Army from the Marines.  Even more so when the use of Civil Air Patrol doesn't actually imply any sort of link to the Air Force in the first place. 

That being the case, it is a strictly esthetic choice and that being the case, I prefer several of the suggestions made here over the year for a darker background to the tapes, etc. but still with white letters. 

No, it doesn't.
"Eagerness and thrill seeking in others' misery is psychologically corrosive, and is also rampant in EMS. It's a natural danger of the job. It will be something to keep under control, something to fight against."

hatentx

Quote from: DNall on August 10, 2008, 08:57:06 AM
Just to be clear here, something like 1% of the AF has anything like a ground combat job. Even the Army is not remotely made up of ground combat folks. All military services are majority support troops, who have no direct practical need of cammo. Even considering the people that do engage in direct ground combat, they aren't doing that but a very tiny percentage of the time when deployed, and are not deployed most of the time.

My point is the ABU/ACU/BDU/etc are all general utility uniforms. None of them are very good camo, and outside of wearing an orange jumpsuit to combat I'd argue that camo uniforms are pretty meaningless in an urban environment anyway.

The whole reason everyone in the military (and CAP too) wears combat utility uniforms is to share solidarity with the deployed combat force - ie even though you're sweeping the floor in Kansas it in some way effects combat ops in Iraq, or by doing these SaR missions w/ a Cessna we save the AF money that they turn around into better training/equip/etc that makes them stronger/better. Now, maybe in some ways there is some little element of truth in some of those connections, and maybe there isn't. The point is less about the actual support than the psychological solidarity that contributes to motivating people to do their jobs well.

I see your point only slightly.  Army guys I can speak for in Iraq and I would venture to say 95% to 99% of Army personal were in some form or way involved in a combat.  It may actually be on the ground patrolling or on a guard tower.  A good number or Army personnel are in a position where they may be called off the FOB or have to convoy and may need to dismount and camouflage is important more so than some guy sweeping a hanger in Kansas. 

Now I can see the argument about the quality of camouflage patterns.  The ACU do work.  They are not designed to be the best at one but world well in all.  I have noticed having a hard time picking out a guy in ACU against a tree line while driving.  In the war we fight I would rather have something that is adaptable which I believe the ACU do the best job possible with what is and has been issued.

stratoflyer

I agree with the comment that wearing the same uniform as those in the field builds solidarity. I read somewhere not to long ago about Air Force personnel working in a civilian setting being ordered to wear BDU's so that they don't forget their work directly affects those in the field. (I think they were doing logistics work stateside in a regular office building.)

"To infinity, and beyond!"

Eduardo Rodriguez, 2LT, CAP

JayT

Quote from: stratoflyer on August 11, 2008, 02:57:47 AM
I agree with the comment that wearing the same uniform as those in the field builds solidarity. I read somewhere not to long ago about Air Force personnel working in a civilian setting being ordered to wear BDU's so that they don't forget their work directly affects those in the field. (I think they were doing logistics work stateside in a regular office building.)



So a twelve year old cadet has solidarity with an Airmen deployed downrange?

If what a person is wearing reminds them to do their job better, then you need new people.
"Eagerness and thrill seeking in others' misery is psychologically corrosive, and is also rampant in EMS. It's a natural danger of the job. It will be something to keep under control, something to fight against."

hatentx

Quote from: JThemann on August 11, 2008, 03:55:30 AM
Quote from: stratoflyer on August 11, 2008, 02:57:47 AM
I agree with the comment that wearing the same uniform as those in the field builds solidarity. I read somewhere not to long ago about Air Force personnel working in a civilian setting being ordered to wear BDU's so that they don't forget their work directly affects those in the field. (I think they were doing logistics work stateside in a regular office building.)



So a twelve year old cadet has solidarity with an Airmen deployed downrange?

If what a person is wearing reminds them to do their job better, then you need new people.

That is where I am thinking as well.  I wear the uniform everyday and the last thing I think about while wearing a uniform is being downrange.  However training and taking experiences learned from the field allows me to think about being downrange. 

Does a uniform promote an environment of team building and a scene of belonging...yeah I would agree and saw yes but that is as far as I could stretch that argument.

stratoflyer

When I wear my uniform, yes, I do think an extra thought about the men and women serving in the armed forces. And so do the people in the street when they see me or others in uniform.

And when I put on my uniform to go flying, I know that when that uniform is on, I am in a different mindset--more professional, more calculating, and more focused.

Ever need to go to the store but you're already in PJ's? Is it that you're just lazy or that your mindset is focused on 'sleep'. It's called conditioning, not a need for new people.

And yes, a 12 year old should wear his uniform thinking about these things.
"To infinity, and beyond!"

Eduardo Rodriguez, 2LT, CAP

Hookedonlemons

Cadet desert uniforms...?
How many cadets in the whole organization operate or even STEP FOOT into a desert enviornment compared to those who don't even SEE desert?

JayT

Quote from: stratoflyer on August 11, 2008, 04:31:45 AM
When I wear my uniform, yes, I do think an extra thought about the men and women serving in the armed forces. And so do the people in the street when they see me or others in uniform.

And when I put on my uniform to go flying, I know that when that uniform is on, I am in a different mindset--more professional, more calculating, and more focused.

Ever need to go to the store but you're already in PJ's? Is it that you're just lazy or that your mindset is focused on 'sleep'. It's called conditioning, not a need for new people.

And yes, a 12 year old should wear his uniform thinking about these things.

Okay, I'll buy part of that.

One of my partners at work is an inactive Marine Lance Corporal. While most guys wear low cut EMT 'clunker' boots, he wear's high cut boots because 'feeling the leather on my ankle reminds me I'm at work.

Howeber, a twelve you old CAP cadet, or a CAP member in general, does not need to be reminded through the wear of BDU's that there's a war on. It's just not needed.
"Eagerness and thrill seeking in others' misery is psychologically corrosive, and is also rampant in EMS. It's a natural danger of the job. It will be something to keep under control, something to fight against."

sawgunner7

Quote from: Hookedonlemons on August 11, 2008, 06:07:20 AM
Cadet desert uniforms...?
How many cadets in the whole organization operate or even STEP FOOT into a desert enviornment compared to those who don't even SEE desert?

Just a thought that popped into my head while reading this thread... A good reason for DCU(s) Might be the simple fact NOT that our mission requires them. But maybe that we are voulenteer... Usually Most Squadrons are under funded or don't have enough of the right size uniforms to give out. Or just don't have any. And most parents until they see there kids are hooked on CAP and that its not just a couple week phase. arent going to buy anything other that second hand uniforms if anything. And in some cases I have seen that it is easier to come across DCUs. So maybe it could open up a window of more adaptability. And be one more way for a cadet to get there hands on a set of uniforms? Anyone think of this as a good idea ???