Main Menu

ABU Boots?

Started by Agent_ND, May 10, 2016, 07:56:35 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KASSRCrashResearch

Quote from: baronet68 on May 11, 2016, 06:19:11 PM
As Murphy states... No combat-ready unit has ever passed inspection. No inspection-ready unit has ever passed combat


Given that the eponymous Murphy was literally an engineer in charge of scientific instrumentation on the rocket sled tests at Holloman AFB and Edwards AFB, I somehow doubt he knew much about combat.   >:D   If you're going to go with rules, probably the most reliable one is Stapp's ironical paradox: "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle".   Oddly enough, my day job is largely a direct continuation of the work that Stapp and Murphy helped to pioneer.

Plus, the "no inspection ready unit" myth is like the rumor that no one with clean turnout gear can be considered to be a "real" firefighter.  Funny how the guys that believe that are dying in high numbers from cancer since smoke and debris at a fire scene is basically a carcinogen chowder.  There's a line between the "eh....**** it" avoidance of looking good and the "for display purposes only" approach that has to be located and maintained.

That said, I happen to enjoy shining boots but at the same time, my experience in the military taught me- thanks to an NCOIC with all the ethics of an Einsatzgruppe commander- that appearances can be extremely deceiving so I have mixed feelings about the "need" for shined boots etc.
I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of what ever is going on.

HGjunkie

Quote from: SarDragon on May 12, 2016, 06:10:40 AM
Quote from: NIN on May 12, 2016, 01:32:26 AM
Here's a mind  blower : they don't issue leather shoes in basic anymore. Patent Leather/ Corfram all the way


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

They aren't patent leather. The current name (since Dupont vacated the IP on Corfam) is poromeric. I'll call them plastic, since I don't feel like typing poromeric any more.

I found out a while back, when pricing a new pair of oxfords (dress shoes), that the leather ones are now significantly more expensive than the plastic shoes. Pay now, or pay later. Life on the plastic is noticeably shorter than the plastic ones, so you'll be replacing them more often. The best I ever got out of the plastic ones was about 18 months, and wore out the soles before the uppers. Spent 6-7n hours a day walking in them on industrial carpet (short pile), and it ate the soles. Other times, I managed to GR up the uppers to the point where they weren't wearable. My current leather ones are about 5 years old, although I only wear then 5-10 times a month.
My first set of chloroplastiframs lasted... well, 7 years now. I can still wear them if I need to. A little buffing and they look presentable. Your mileage will vary.
••• retired
2d Lt USAF

KASSRCrashResearch

Quote from: HGjunkie on May 12, 2016, 01:15:00 PM
Quote from: SarDragon on May 12, 2016, 06:10:40 AM
Quote from: NIN on May 12, 2016, 01:32:26 AM
Here's a mind  blower : they don't issue leather shoes in basic anymore. Patent Leather/ Corfram all the way


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

They aren't patent leather. The current name (since Dupont vacated the IP on Corfam) is poromeric. I'll call them plastic, since I don't feel like typing poromeric any more.

I found out a while back, when pricing a new pair of oxfords (dress shoes), that the leather ones are now significantly more expensive than the plastic shoes. Pay now, or pay later. Life on the plastic is noticeably shorter than the plastic ones, so you'll be replacing them more often. The best I ever got out of the plastic ones was about 18 months, and wore out the soles before the uppers. Spent 6-7n hours a day walking in them on industrial carpet (short pile), and it ate the soles. Other times, I managed to GR up the uppers to the point where they weren't wearable. My current leather ones are about 5 years old, although I only wear then 5-10 times a month.
My first set of chloroplastiframs lasted... well, 7 years now. I can still wear them if I need to. A little buffing and they look presentable. Your mileage will vary.

Hell, if it weren't for my shoe size changing on my left foot (major surgery to basically reconstruct the thing) in 2010, I would probably still be able to wear the "fake leather" dress shoes I was giving in 2001 when I went through AF basic.   They were practically indestructible.
I have complete faith in the continued absurdity of what ever is going on.

Eclipse

Quote from: HGjunkie on May 12, 2016, 01:15:00 PM
My first set of chloroplastiframs lasted... well, 7 years now. I can still wear them if I need to. A little buffing and they look presentable. Your mileage will vary.

Mine lasted nearly 16, until one day the heels literally disintegrated while I was at a meeting.

"Where the heck are all these little crumbs of rubber coming from?"

Still deciding if I should resole or replace.

"That Others May Zoom"

NIN

Quote from: SarDragon on May 12, 2016, 06:10:40 AM
They aren't patent leather. The current name (since Dupont vacated the IP on Corfam) is poromeric. I'll call them plastic, since I don't feel like typing poromeric any more.

And I've been calling them "Corframs" for so long that I don't feel like calling the "poromeric" :)

Quote
I found out a while back, when pricing a new pair of oxfords (dress shoes), that the leather ones are now significantly more expensive than the plastic shoes. Pay now, or pay later. Life on the plastic is noticeably shorter than the plastic ones, so you'll be replacing them more often. The best I ever got out of the plastic ones was about 18 months, and wore out the soles before the uppers. Spent 6-7n hours a day walking in them on industrial carpet (short pile), and it ate the soles. Other times, I managed to GR up the uppers to the point where they weren't wearable. My current leather ones are about 5 years old, although I only wear then 5-10 times a month.

The current pair I have look like the low-quarters the Navy used to issue with a taller toe-box. I noticed that it seemed like the older Bates Lites shoes I had in the past, the toe area would lose its "roundedness" as the shoe aged.

Current pair:


Older Bates Lites:
Darin Ninness, Col, CAP
I have no responsibilities whatsoever
I like to have Difficult Adult Conversations™
The contents of this post are Copyright © 2007-2024 by NIN. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

stillamarine

Quote from: Agent_ND on May 12, 2016, 01:36:33 AM
Quote from: NIN on May 12, 2016, 01:32:26 AM
Here's a mind  blower : they don't issue leather shoes in basic anymore. Patent Leather/ Corfram all the way


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Are you talking about Boots or Dress Shoes?

Probably meant both because that is the truth. I was issued a pair of leather lo-quarters, all leather boots and a pair of leather jungle boots. But.....that was a long time ago.
Tim Gardiner, 1st LT, CAP

USMC AD 1996-2001
USMCR    2001-2005  Admiral, Great State of Nebraska Navy  MS, MO, UDF
tim.gardiner@gmail.com

Eclipse

Quote from: SarDragon on May 12, 2016, 06:10:40 AMThe current name (since Dupont vacated the IP on Corfam) is poromeric.

Interesting how a generic term lives on well past it being a "thing".

Just for my own edification, I went and looked up the trademark.  It appears to have expired back in 1987, and the cleaner I
bought with mine in 99 or 2000 is called poremeric cleaner.

So it's been quite a while (29+ years) since that was the official name.

"That Others May Zoom"

Okayish Aviator

Quote from: SarDragon on May 11, 2016, 04:55:06 AM
Quote from: Luis R. Ramos on May 11, 2016, 04:31:47 AM
Why do I get the feeling that in this thread...

That every time SAR makes a parry with his sword he draws blood, while others hit his shield or just beats the air?

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."

I learned it as "Old age and treachery will always beat out youth and inexperience."
Always give 100%, unless you're giving blood.


grunt82abn

Quote from: grunt82abn on May 13, 2016, 12:26:44 AM
I learned it as "Old age and treachery will always beat out youth and inexperience."


This very quote was used by my House Captain today during an AAR when one of the new firefighters stated " I can't believe the old guys figured it out". This will always ring true!!!
Sean Riley, TSGT
US Army 1987 to 1994, WIARNG 1994 to 2008
DoD Firefighter Paramedic 2000 to Present