F32 Rescinded 1 Oct 2014?

[Eclipse]

Um?

http://www.capmembers.com/forms_publications__regulations/publications-bulletin-1698/

[a2capt]

Too much kickback?
Gaping hole in it?
We'll never know.

[Storm Chaser]

Huh? What was wrong with the form?

[a2capt]

The regulation that required it .. has been rescinded.

[dwb]

No, the one that was effective Oct 1 was rescinded. Look at the line right above it.

Ditto with CPP. The one effective Oct 1 was rescinded and replaced by one effective in April.

[Eclipse]

That's what I was thinking on first glance, then I thought, maybe it meant that it was
implemented Apr and then disavowed in Oct?  So still used until then?

[dwb]

That portion of the page has looked the same since April, when they abruptly changed the effective date of the changes.

[Майор Хаткевич]

Anyone get any more solid info?

[dwb]

Solid info about what? Nothing has been rescinded. My explanation is what happened. I remember seeing that page change back in April.

[Майор Хаткевич]

So...why can't they remove the duplicate info?

[Eclipse]

Obfuscation.

[SarDragon]

The list provides the current dates for forms. If there's a situation where a form with a newer date is rescinded, such as this one, it is important that the members know what the correct form is.

[Eclipse]

The list provides the current dates for forms. If there's a situation where a form with a newer date is rescinded, such as this one, it is important that the members know what the correct form is.

If it's got the same form number, all that should be in there is the current copy and have "previous versions obsolete".

Obsoleting a form with the same number >after< the revision data of the one considered current makes no sense.