(http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/idrutu/idrutu0801/idrutu080100076/2356173-slanted-view-of-long-blue-corridor.jpg)
The text in this post is in italics to commemorate how slanted the article is.
They raise points, then in some cases contradict the point with facts presented later.
I can see the angle, but don't see the point of this, since anyone researching the topic in more detail
would not come to the same conclusions.
http://www.usatoday.com/longform/news/nation/2014/06/12/lies-coverups-mask-roots-small-aircraft-carnage-unfit-for-flight-part-1/10405323/ (http://www.usatoday.com/longform/news/nation/2014/06/12/lies-coverups-mask-roots-small-aircraft-carnage-unfit-for-flight-part-1/10405323/)
Whatcha expect from USA Today?
Well, there were some graphs...
IMHO, just another example of Chicken Little journalism reporting.
Quote from: SarDragon on June 18, 2014, 07:01:11 PM
IMHO, just another example of Chicken Little journalism reporting.
I would substitute a less polite word (beginning with an "S") for "Little"
Quote from: JeffDG on June 18, 2014, 07:16:20 PM
Quote from: SarDragon on June 18, 2014, 07:01:11 PM
IMHO, just another example of Chicken Little journalism reporting.
I would substitute a less polite word (beginning with an "S") for "Little"
anagram of THIS? HITS?
Useless Today is written to target 4th grade comprehension, much like Popular Science. If an article goes over a few paragraphs, it's a stretch because the reader might get bored. So it better be "good". ;)