CAP Talk

General Discussion => Forum Support => Topic started by: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 12:37:16 AM

Title: Ranks for Members
Post by: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 12:37:16 AM
I read an earlier post stating that this section was for suggestions for the site. Therefore, I have a suggestion. Why not instead of having "Recruit, Member, Forum Regular, etc.", follow the CAP ranks? It would be a nice change. However, this is just a suggestion.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Майор Хаткевич on July 25, 2013, 03:42:07 AM
Because CAP grade has nothing to do with a forum. Its nice as is.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: midmissouriwingcadet on July 25, 2013, 04:54:19 AM
Because the forum is unofficial. And ranking (usually) are for official stuff. For example, what do you think about an Airman Basic in real life is a 1st lieutenant in this forum just because he starts on this forum before joining for real. It will be confuse. Also, asking and answering question doesn't promote you up. So ..... yeah. Sorry for the grammar, I am new!






C/AB


Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: The Infamous Meerkat on July 25, 2013, 11:09:30 AM
I like how this one ^^^ gets it.

Refreshing. :P

As for the original idea, I don't agree with it, but only because of the small impropriety of having a rank system for members of a group that already has a rank system. It just seems like we'd be getting too... excited about rank, when really rank doesn't mean a whole lot, considering we're all civilian volunteers that can do as they please. Most people already put their rank in their signature line anyways, so you should already know where you stand with them. :P

I think we should just keep it simple.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 03:51:18 PM
Yeah, I guess your right. Having ranks would add a certain "cool" factor, though.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: jeders on July 25, 2013, 04:39:08 PM
Quote from: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 03:51:18 PM
Yeah, I guess your right. Having ranks would add a certain "cool" factor, though.

Trust me, once you get a TMFT award, you'll know what cool is.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: ol'fido on July 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
I just want to be the "Resident Curmudgeon". >:(
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Critical AOA on July 25, 2013, 10:29:39 PM
Quote from: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 03:51:18 PM
Yeah, I guess your right. Having ranks would add a certain "cool" factor, though.

Really?  How so?  What is cool about it?

One man's cool is another man's bleh or lame or dumb.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: SarDragon on July 26, 2013, 08:11:06 AM
Quote from: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 03:51:18 PM
Yeah, I guess your right. Having ranks would add a certain "cool" factor, though.

I'd really prefer my left. It's my better side.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: EMT-83 on July 26, 2013, 04:50:44 PM
The idea has merit, if only for the entertainment value. Just think of some recent C/AB v. Lt Col conversations
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: RiverAux on July 26, 2013, 05:47:11 PM
Quote from: TexasCadet on July 25, 2013, 12:37:16 AM
I read an earlier post stating that this section was for suggestions for the site. Therefore, I have a suggestion. Why not instead of having "Recruit, Member, Forum Regular, etc.", follow the CAP ranks? It would be a nice change. However, this is just a suggestion.
Might be hard to reconcile with anonymous posting...
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: ColonelJack on July 26, 2013, 06:50:22 PM
Quote from: ol'fido on July 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
I just want to be the "Resident Curmudgeon". >:(

Funny ... I always wanted to be listed as "Tsar of all the Russias."

No, really.

Jack
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: ZigZag911 on July 26, 2013, 08:06:58 PM
"High Commissioner of Hot Air" would be my personal choice!
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Critical AOA on July 26, 2013, 11:04:09 PM
Quote from: ZigZag911 on July 26, 2013, 08:06:58 PM
"High Commissioner of Hot Air" would be my personal choice!

You'd have a lot of competition for that title.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Phil Hirons, Jr. on July 27, 2013, 12:08:48 AM
Chief Cook and Head Bottle Washer
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: AngelWings on July 27, 2013, 12:49:46 AM
Troll would be a very useful one, in case we needed it.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Garibaldi on July 27, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Quote from: AngelWings on July 27, 2013, 12:49:46 AM
Troll would be a very useful one, in case we needed it.

Troll, Radioman, whatever.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: AngelWings on July 27, 2013, 01:05:46 AM
Quote from: Garibaldi on July 27, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Quote from: AngelWings on July 27, 2013, 12:49:46 AM
Troll would be a very useful one, in case we needed it.

Troll, Radioman, whatever.
Ah... a man I was happy forgetting about. I'd be a bit surprised if he doesn't talk about CAPTalk a lot.
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: ZigZag911 on July 27, 2013, 08:59:56 PM
Quote from: David Vandenbroeck on July 26, 2013, 11:04:09 PM
Quote from: ZigZag911 on July 26, 2013, 08:06:58 PM
"High Commissioner of Hot Air" would be my personal choice!

You'd have a lot of competition for that title.

I'm not insisting on exclusiviity
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Brad on July 28, 2013, 12:49:47 AM
Quote from: Garibaldi on July 27, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Quote from: AngelWings on July 27, 2013, 12:49:46 AM
Troll would be a very useful one, in case we needed it.

Troll, Radioman, whatever.

(http://i.qkme.me/3pskh6.jpg)
Title: Re: Ranks for Members
Post by: Critical AOA on July 28, 2013, 01:02:18 AM
Quote from: ZigZag911 on July 27, 2013, 08:59:56 PM
Quote from: David Vandenbroeck on July 26, 2013, 11:04:09 PM
Quote from: ZigZag911 on July 26, 2013, 08:06:58 PM
"High Commissioner of Hot Air" would be my personal choice!

You'd have a lot of competition for that title.

I'm not insisting on exclusiviity

Which is good.. We'd actually have enough for a Board of Commissioners.