Do they count everything you have at encampment?

Started by ElectricPenguin, January 30, 2011, 10:44:19 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ElectricPenguin


JoeTomasone

That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


ElectricPenguin

Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.

tsrup

Short and simple, If it's on the list, bring it.  If it isn't, leave it at home.

check then recheck your gear.

In the past though, people do forget things, and we have always been accommodating toward that fact (usually it's hygiene items), we send a couple people out to the local BX or what not to get them for you.     
Paramedic
hang-around.

HGjunkie

Of course forgetting a piece of gear and forgetting extra underwear are two distinctly different things...
••• retired
2d Lt USAF

ElectricPenguin

Quote from: HGjunkie on January 30, 2011, 10:56:17 PM
Of course forgetting a piece of gear and forgetting extra underwear are two distinctly different things...

...wouldn't it fit under both category's?

JoeTomasone

Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.


That would obviously be a judgment call based on why they feel it is required.    Since FLWG does not require them, I can only speculate that TXWG encampments feature activities that may require said protection, and that lacking said protection, you would not be permitted to participate.   

Anyone from TXWG have insight?


ol'fido

Yes. You should bring what's on the packing list. The stuff is on there for a reason and except for your uniforms, uniform accessories, and insignia most of it should be stuff you own anyway. A lot of encampment locations will have access to Wally World if you have forgotten something critical like toothpaste or socks. Many will have access to some uniform parts if they are on a military post although this is getting harder for BDUs and if you are not on an AFB you may not have access to blues parts. CAP Insignia...hopefully, someone has an extra.

No. They generally don't check to see if you have everything. They will do a baggage check to see if you have items you ought not too. Check that list too. But I have seen(and alerted the CoC) when I checked a cadet's bags and saw only one extra pair of underwear(Shiver).

Must haves for any encampment: Wooden ruler, shoe polish, sunscreen, foot powder, and laundry detergent. Others will probably add to this list.
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006

ElectricPenguin

Quote from: ol'fido on January 31, 2011, 11:16:18 PM
Yes. You should bring what's on the packing list. The stuff is on there for a reason and except for your uniforms, uniform accessories, and insignia most of it should be stuff you own anyway. A lot of encampment locations will have access to Wally World if you have forgotten something critical like toothpaste or socks. Many will have access to some uniform parts if they are on a military post although this is getting harder for BDUs and if you are not on an AFB you may not have access to blues parts. CAP Insignia...hopefully, someone has an extra.

No. They generally don't check to see if you have everything. They will do a baggage check to see if you have items you ought not too. Check that list too. But I have seen(and alerted the CoC) when I checked a cadet's bags and saw only one extra pair of underwear(Shiver).

Must haves for any encampment: Wooden ruler, shoe polish, sunscreen, foot powder, and laundry detergent. Others will probably add to this list.

Detergent wasn't on the list, I will bring anyways. Thanks!!!

Rotorhead

COWG does not "count" your gear to make sure you brought everything. (We DO inspect to make sure you don't bring contraband.) It is wise to bring what's on the list, however. It all has a purpose and remember: Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
Capt. Scott Orr, CAP
Deputy Commander/Cadets
Prescott Composite Sqdn. 206
Prescott, AZ

JROB

I was a TAC Officer at Texas wing's winter encampment. We did not check the number of items that cadets had we checked for contraband items and things of that nature. I would not suggest bringing laundry detergent to the summer encampment I'm not sure if cadets will have access to the laundry facilities on base. Also if you are missing a small item (i.e. hangers, pen, paper) you can usually borrow them from the members of your flight.
Maj. Jason Robinson
Squadron Commander, Desoto Composite Squadron
SER-MS-096

"If you are in trouble anywhere in the world, an airplane can fly over and drop flowers, but a helicopter can land and save your life"-Igor Sikorsky

Eclipse

Bring what is on the equipment list from that activity. 

Nothing more, nothing less.

You will be fine.

"That Others May Zoom"

ElectricPenguin

Quote from: JROB on February 01, 2011, 10:01:15 PM
I was a TAC Officer at Texas wing's winter encampment. We did not check the number of items that cadets had we checked for contraband items and things of that nature. I would not suggest bringing laundry detergent to the summer encampment I'm not sure if cadets will have access to the laundry facilities on base. Also if you are missing a small item (i.e. hangers, pen, paper) you can usually borrow them from the members of your flight.


Thanks!

Daniel

#13
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on February 02, 2011, 05:12:32 AM
Quote from: JROB on February 01, 2011, 10:01:15 PM
I was a TAC Officer at Texas wing's winter encampment. We did not check the number of items that cadets had we checked for contraband items and things of that nature. I would not suggest bringing laundry detergent to the summer encampment I'm not sure if cadets will have access to the laundry facilities on base. Also if you are missing a small item (i.e. hangers, pen, paper) you can usually borrow them from the members of your flight.


Thanks!

I'ma give you a few tips.

1. Shakedown inspection is just for contraband, no ones going to tediously count your items. That would make things that way to long at in-processing and make everyone want to go home before the encampment even starts.

2. Just because you could borrow something off a flight member doesn't mean you should intend on it though. You should probably pack deliberately.

3. (as someone said) don't pack items that require other things to work, like laundry soap. Unless however that thing something that you can bring (i.e. bringing starch, you should bring an iron.)

4. if they recommend you bring an item. Bring it if you can.

5. don't overpack on stupid things. What are you going to do with 800 hangers?  Especially since the packing list recommended like 3?

6. if you think you might need something for this activity and its not on the packing list but not listed as contraband  then take it.
C/Capt Daniel L, CAP
Wright Brothers No. 12670
Mitchell No. 59781
Earhart No. 15416

1LtNurseOfficer

Most importantly, remember you have to carry around that 200lb bag you brought... upstairs, downstairs, over a wall or wherever else you're told to take it.

ElectricPenguin

Quote from: 1LtNurseOfficer on February 02, 2011, 05:57:14 AM
Most importantly, remember you have to carry around that 200lb bag you brought... upstairs, downstairs, over a wall or wherever else you're told to take it.


Are you kidding me? Over a wall???

Eclipse

I can't begin to imagine where you would need to take your gear "over a wall", except maybe NESA.

As to the equipment list - the senior staff who run the activity know exactly what you need to be successful, if it isn't on the list, you don't need it
and yo may not have any place to store it.

"That Others May Zoom"

Daniel

Quote from: Eclipse on February 02, 2011, 06:39:04 PM
I can't begin to imagine where you would need to take your gear "over a wall", except maybe NESA.

As to the equipment list - the senior staff who run the activity know exactly what you need to be successful, if it isn't on the list, you don't need it
and yo may not have any place to store it.

Eclipse, if this were the case then no one in MOWG needs BDU boot blousing bands or sunscreen or chap stick.. things get forgotten
C/Capt Daniel L, CAP
Wright Brothers No. 12670
Mitchell No. 59781
Earhart No. 15416

Eclipse

Quote from: Daniel L on February 02, 2011, 07:41:21 PMEclipse, if this were the case then no one in MOWG needs BDU boot blousing bands or sunscreen or chap stick.. things get forgotten

For most people that sunscreen and lip balm would be in their toiletry kit as a matter of course, but point taken about cadets not even considering the need, perhaps you should suggest an update to the list.

I would not consider "blousing bands" to be "equipment" - they should be a part of your standard uniform, though a lot of members don't even know they exist, and even fewer wear them.  We provide a pair to each attendee.

By "equipment" I mean like 24 hour gear and other nonsense that is unnecessary for an encampment.

"That Others May Zoom"

Dad2-4

This could easily digress into another "strange things you've seen cadets bring to encampment" sort of thread.
If you have the opportunity, talk to other cadets in your home squadrton who have been to encampment and pick their brains about what to bring, what not to bring, what they wish they brought but didn't, what they took and didn't need, etc.
Like has already been mentioned, pack to the list, double check, buy or borrow what you need, check again.
BTW, leave the toys at home. You don't have time, and it may get taken at check-in.

a2capt

Quote from: Daniel L on February 02, 2011, 05:41:20 AM3. (as someone said) don't pack items that require other things to work, like laundry soap. Unless however that thing something that you can bring (i.e. bringing starch, you should bring an iron.)
...
5. don't overpack on stupid things. What are you going to do with 800 hangers?  Especially since the packing list recommended like 3?
But you could hawk hangers to those who didn't bring enough, too - and earn 'points' or even cash ;) ... and that can of starch, while it might be empty at the end of the week, it could make or break your flight, element, etc. from winning something because everyone's uniform was squared away, when someone else didn't have any.


But yes, don't overpack. You'll find you won't touch most of it, if it's not on the list anyway. The lists are created from past experience, current curriculum and experience. A small package of laundry powder may go a long way and take up little to no impact in your overall packing scheme though.

Dieneces

Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.

When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

davidsinn

Quote from: Dieneces on February 11, 2011, 10:43:18 PM
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.

When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

You mandate the under garments a cadet is allowed to wear? Isn't that going a bit far?
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Spaceman3750

Quote from: Dieneces on February 11, 2011, 10:43:18 PM
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.

When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

PT represents 20% of encampment now? WIWAC at encampment I remember a lot of death by PowerPoint, drill, and inspections, but not a whole lot of PT...

davidsinn

Quote from: Spaceman3750 on February 12, 2011, 12:13:15 AM
Quote from: Dieneces on February 11, 2011, 10:43:18 PM
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.

When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

PT represents 20% of encampment now? WIWAC at encampment I remember a lot of death by PowerPoint, drill, and inspections, but not a whole lot of PT...

It shouldn't but if taken with missed time elsewhere in the program it could be the straw that breaks the camels back and hits that 20% mark.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Dieneces

Quote from: davidsinn on February 11, 2011, 11:57:44 PM
Quote from: Dieneces on February 11, 2011, 10:43:18 PM
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.


When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

You mandate the under garments a cadet is allowed to wear? Isn't that going a bit far?

Lol you read too much into my reply, what I meant was essentially - if someone knowingly did not bring an item on the list (in my mind I was think items like vollleyball knee pads etc) then they would not participate. I was talking about the basic idea of purposely not bring gear, not undergarments. Next time I will be sure to specify my generality lol

davidsinn

Quote from: Dieneces on February 16, 2011, 08:33:32 AM
Quote from: davidsinn on February 11, 2011, 11:57:44 PM
Quote from: Dieneces on February 11, 2011, 10:43:18 PM
Quote from: ElectricPenguin on January 30, 2011, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: JoeTomasone on January 30, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
That would almost certainly depend on what was missing and how hard it would be to replace it.

If you have some examples, we might be able to speculate more.


Hahahaha, well tx wing requires sport supports and I don't really care to bring those.


When I was encampment commander and this happened, the cadet was not allowed to participate.  Remember you have to complete 80% of the curriculum.  And part of that curriculum is met with the sports/pt activities you do.  If you are not allowed to participate, you may be putting your own graduation credit at risk - and it would be shame to go through all of encampment but not receive credit because you chose not to bring something that simple.

You mandate the under garments a cadet is allowed to wear? Isn't that going a bit far?

Lol you read too much into my reply, what I meant was essentially - if someone knowingly did not bring an item on the list (in my mind I was think items like vollleyball knee pads etc) then they would not participate. I was talking about the basic idea of purposely not bring gear, not undergarments. Next time I will be sure to specify my generality lol

The thing that gets me is that list has athletic supporter on it. That's too far in my mind. Even V-ball kneepads is a bit far. You can play without them. I wouldn't buy a pair just for encampment. If kneepads are so important that you wouldn't allow a cadet to participate without them then you really should supply them.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Nathan

Quote from: davidsinn on February 16, 2011, 05:22:28 PM
The thing that gets me is that list has athletic supporter on it. That's too far in my mind. Even V-ball kneepads is a bit far. You can play without them. I wouldn't buy a pair just for encampment. If kneepads are so important that you wouldn't allow a cadet to participate without them then you really should supply them.

A cadet doesn't NEED deodorant, either. Or a toothbrush. Or soap. Or glasses.

Or, for that matter, BDU's. The basic uniform for any cadet is blues. And there's no reg that says you can't do PT in blues.

Would you have an issue mandating any of these?
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

davidsinn

Quote from: Nathan on February 16, 2011, 10:34:20 PM
Quote from: davidsinn on February 16, 2011, 05:22:28 PM
The thing that gets me is that list has athletic supporter on it. That's too far in my mind. Even V-ball kneepads is a bit far. You can play without them. I wouldn't buy a pair just for encampment. If kneepads are so important that you wouldn't allow a cadet to participate without them then you really should supply them.

A cadet doesn't NEED deodorant, either. Or a toothbrush. Or soap. Or glasses.

Or, for that matter, BDU's. The basic uniform for any cadet is blues. And there's no reg that says you can't do PT in blues.

Would you have an issue mandating any of these?

All I'm saying is I was a kid once too and vollyball is not that dangerous that you should be benching a cadet because they didn't want to/couldn't afford to buy a single use item. If you feel it is that dangerous then you should provide the necessary PPE as part of your ORM and not rely on the cadet to bring them. As far as undergarments that's a personal thing and no one should be mandating what kind a person can wear. I was a high school athlete not that long ago so I'm not totally talking our of my FPOC.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Nathan

Quote from: davidsinn on February 17, 2011, 12:17:08 AM
All I'm saying is I was a kid once too and vollyball is not that dangerous that you should be benching a cadet because they didn't want to/couldn't afford to buy a single use item. If you feel it is that dangerous then you should provide the necessary PPE as part of your ORM and not rely on the cadet to bring them. As far as undergarments that's a personal thing and no one should be mandating what kind a person can wear. I was a high school athlete not that long ago so I'm not totally talking our of my FPOC.

So your argument is that cadets shouldn't be forced to bring athletic protectors because it's embarrassing?

I don't think it's a huge issue. Even at COS, we had to wear the protective gear. No, volleyball isn't that dangerous. But asking cadets to bring a bit of protection just in case also isn't really asking much. So if you can make the activity safer (a good thing) without much of a detriment, then you say we shouldn't do it because cadets shouldn't have to be embarrassed when the leaders see a piece of equipment they were ordered to bring?
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

davidsinn

Quote from: Nathan on February 17, 2011, 01:37:13 AM
Quote from: davidsinn on February 17, 2011, 12:17:08 AM
All I'm saying is I was a kid once too and vollyball is not that dangerous that you should be benching a cadet because they didn't want to/couldn't afford to buy a single use item. If you feel it is that dangerous then you should provide the necessary PPE as part of your ORM and not rely on the cadet to bring them. As far as undergarments that's a personal thing and no one should be mandating what kind a person can wear. I was a high school athlete not that long ago so I'm not totally talking our of my FPOC.

So your argument is that cadets shouldn't be forced to bring athletic protectors because it's embarrassing?

I don't think it's a huge issue. Even at COS, we had to wear the protective gear. No, volleyball isn't that dangerous. But asking cadets to bring a bit of protection just in case also isn't really asking much. So if you can make the activity safer (a good thing) without much of a detriment, then you say we shouldn't do it because cadets shouldn't have to be embarrassed when the leaders see a piece of equipment they were ordered to bring?

I'm saying that in all of the sports I ever played that I never wore one because I didn't like them. That was a personal choice. I don't think you should mandate an item that the cadet may never use again when the potential gain in safety is so small. If your ORM matrix requires a specific piece of safety gear for the activity to proceed then the onerous is on the activity to provide that piece of gear.

An example: If your encampment has the cadets swim 50m in deep water and you have cadets that can't swim, then you need to provide appropriate PFDs. You shouldn't try and require the cadet to bring them when they may never be around deep water again.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Cool Mace

At NCC Drill comp. back in '03 all the teams had to bring their own knee pads to play vollyball. It's part of the comp. and no one said anything about it. I know I liked having them when I dove for the ball on a hard court. 2 bucks at walmart? No big deal. I'm sure they can find that money in the couch.

Sir, with all due respect, I think you're reading too far in to this.
CAP is what you make of it. If you don't put anything in to it, you won't get anything out of it.
Eaker #2250
C/Lt Col, Ret.
The cookies and donuts were a lie.

davidsinn

Quote from: Cool Mace on February 17, 2011, 02:50:12 AM

Sir, with all due respect, I think you're reading too far in to this.

Maybe. But I have had enough cadets that had enough trouble affording dues that buying knee pads would be a problem.  My wife just took command of another unit and some of those cadets are in just as bad of shape. Remember encampment is a mandatory part of the program so efforts should be made to keep it inexpensive. Buying two dozen pairs of pads and rotating them through the teams and then reusing them year to year would make the per cadet cost almost nil.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Nathan

#33
Quote from: davidsinn on February 17, 2011, 02:28:47 AM
I'm saying that in all of the sports I ever played that I never wore one because I didn't like them. That was a personal choice. I don't think you should mandate an item that the cadet may never use again when the potential gain in safety is so small. If your ORM matrix requires a specific piece of safety gear for the activity to proceed then the onerous is on the activity to provide that piece of gear.

An example: If your encampment has the cadets swim 50m in deep water and you have cadets that can't swim, then you need to provide appropriate PFDs. You shouldn't try and require the cadet to bring them when they may never be around deep water again.

No, if you have a cadet who can't swim, the cadet doesn't get in the part of the pool that is too deep. I've never heard of an encampment that required cadets to complete a swim for completion, but if such a requirement was necessary, it would be noted in advance. And cadets who can't swim, if they want to get in the deep end of the pool, would need to learn how to swim, bring their own equipment, or not go.

Come on, you can't put ALL of the responsibility on the senior members. The staff is responsible for ensuring the safety of the cadets, but that doesn't mean that they are responsible for providing equipment necessary to ensure that safety. All it means is that certain equipement is mandated, and if the cadets don't bring it, then they can't safely participate, and therefore, don't get to participate.

They don't bring canteens? They don't get to stay. They don't bring tennis shoes? They're either running in boots, shelling out money to a gracious senior member who will make a Wal-Mart run, or going home. They didn't bring appropriate equipment for sports? They're not going to play sports.

It's not a foreign concept. When encampments CAN provide, then all power to them. But the cadets are expected to be responsible for meeting the seniors halfway. I have no problem going out on a mission with a complete n00b to SAR, but I'm not going to keep a whole second set of gear just in case the n00b doesn't remember something. I'll teach the n00b about how to use his equipment, but I'm not going to buy it for him.

If it has been determined that cadets need the equipment to participate safely, then they wear it. Just like they'll wear tennis shoes for PT. Just like they'll wear a canteen on their PT at all times. They'll bring what the staff says they'll need to participate, or they don't get to participate. Seems pretty simple to me. It's not up to the cadet to run a personal risk assessment on an activity they didn't help plan and decide that they don't need certain pieces of equipment just because they didn't use it for their non-CAP activities.

BTW: Have you used knee-pads for any sport? You can't just "reuse" them. If they're a little too tight, you can't move. If they're a little too big, they won't stay on. You have to find ones that fit you. And you're seriously saying that encampments should reuse athletic supporters?

And having encampments shell out money to buy equipment for every cadet is only going to drive encampment costs UP, not down. The cadets are going to be paying for that equipment anyway. They might as well buy it themselves and make sure that they're getting something that fits and that they can personally afford.
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

Eclipse

#34
Encampment, to my chagrin, is not a mandatory part of the program.

I gotta go with Nathan on this, for the most part.

"That Others May Zoom"

davidsinn

Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 03:11:48 AM
Encampment, to my chagrin, is not a mandatory part of the program.

I gotta go with Nathan on this, for the most part.

It's required for Mitchell. If you don't promote you get 2b'd. I'd consider that mandatory.

Quote from: Nathan on February 17, 2011, 03:11:15 AM
BTW: Have you used knee-pads for any sport? You can't just "reuse" them. If they're a little too tight, you can't move. If they're a little too big, they won't stay on. You have to find ones that fit you. And you're seriously saying that encampments should reuse athletic supporters?

No, I have not worn kneepads for a sport. I played soccer where knee pads are specifically forbidden. There are only 12 people on the court for volleyball at a time. I'm sure you can stock proper sizes and reuse them and amortize the cost over many years. I'm saying you should not be mandating specific types of undergarments at all. Period.

Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

Eclipse

The point about Mitchell has been made before and doesn't really hold any water.

Only about 15% of cadets achieve the Mitchell, and far too few commanders adhere to the guideline regarding progression requirements.
Plenty of cadets have had a successful experience in CAP and never been to an encampment.

As it is today, encampments are a value-add to CAP, not a requirement.

"That Others May Zoom"

davidsinn

Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 04:29:24 AM
As it is today, encampments are a value-add to CAP, not a requirement.

That's a sorry state of things too.
Former CAP Captain
David Sinn

ElectricPenguin

Wow, I thought this thread was dead a week ago...  :P

Eclipse

Quote from: davidsinn on February 17, 2011, 04:46:00 AM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 04:29:24 AM
As it is today, encampments are a value-add to CAP, not a requirement.

That's a sorry state of things too.

On this we agree...

"That Others May Zoom"

Nathan

Quote from: davidsinn on February 17, 2011, 04:18:08 AM
No, I have not worn kneepads for a sport. I played soccer where knee pads are specifically forbidden. There are only 12 people on the court for volleyball at a time. I'm sure you can stock proper sizes and reuse them and amortize the cost over many years. I'm saying you should not be mandating specific types of undergarments at all. Period.

They aren't "undergarments" just because they are worn over the genitalia. They are pieces of safety equipment designed to, unlike underwear, protect the area from physical injury. A helmet is not a hat, and cleats are not really shoes. CAP has every right to dictate what safety equipment will be worn during athletic activities, regardless of your own personal definition.

Period.
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

Eclipse

Quote from: Nathan on February 17, 2011, 06:06:35 AM
They aren't "undergarments" just because they are worn over the genitalia. They are pieces of safety equipment designed to, unlike underwear, protect the area from physical injury. A helmet is not a hat, and cleats are not really shoes. CAP has every right to dictate what safety equipment will be worn during athletic activities, regardless of your own personal definition.

Period.

Wait, you wear it where?

"That Others May Zoom"


Nathan

Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 03:28:04 PM
Quote from: Nathan on February 17, 2011, 06:06:35 AM
They aren't "undergarments" just because they are worn over the genitalia. They are pieces of safety equipment designed to, unlike underwear, protect the area from physical injury. A helmet is not a hat, and cleats are not really shoes. CAP has every right to dictate what safety equipment will be worn during athletic activities, regardless of your own personal definition.

Period.

Wait, you wear it where?

Athletic supporters, aka jock straps. That's what started the conversation.
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

Eclipse


"That Others May Zoom"

ol'fido

Gee, I'm glad we didn't do anything strenuous during my 4 years in the Infantry since we were never required to have one. ::) ::)
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006

Nathan

Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.

Eclipse

Quote from: Nathan on February 22, 2011, 10:59:14 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 07:29:25 PM
Seriously, Nathan.  Duh.

Jeez, I'm confused now. What was I supposed to clarify?

Did you really think I didn't know where this "safety equipment" was worn?

"That Others May Zoom"

SarDragon

Quote from: Eclipse on February 22, 2011, 11:21:08 PM
Quote from: Nathan on February 22, 2011, 10:59:14 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 07:29:25 PM
Seriously, Nathan.  Duh.

Jeez, I'm confused now. What was I supposed to clarify?

Did you really think I didn't know where this "safety equipment" was worn?

I think your possible attempt at snarky sarcasm is a fail.
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
50 Year Member
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret

ol'fido

Haven't seen so much talk about "athletic supporters" since the last Booster Club meeting. ;D ;D
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006

ElectricPenguin

 :P
Quote from: ol'fido on February 23, 2011, 11:49:32 PM
Haven't seen so much talk about "athletic supporters" since the last Booster Club meeting. ;D ;D

No idea what a booster club meeting is, but oh well. If anyone has any problem with the "look" of supporters, Under Armour makes "break sliders". But its just more money to spend on something you will never use again. :P :o

tsrup

Paramedic
hang-around.

ElectricPenguin


ol'fido

Quote from: ElectricPenguin on February 25, 2011, 05:01:36 AM
:P
Quote from: ol'fido on February 23, 2011, 11:49:32 PM
Haven't seen so much talk about "athletic supporters" since the last Booster Club meeting. ;D ;D

No idea what a booster club meeting is, but oh well. If anyone has any problem with the "look" of supporters, Under Armour makes "break sliders". But its just more money to spend on something you will never use again. :P :o

"Booster Club"- Organization of parents, alumni, and interested persons that supports the academic or athletic programs at school or university.
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006

Nathan

Quote from: SarDragon on February 23, 2011, 06:39:21 AM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 22, 2011, 11:21:08 PM
Quote from: Nathan on February 22, 2011, 10:59:14 PM
Quote from: Eclipse on February 17, 2011, 07:29:25 PM
Seriously, Nathan.  Duh.

Jeez, I'm confused now. What was I supposed to clarify?

Did you really think I didn't know where this "safety equipment" was worn?

I think your possible attempt at snarky sarcasm is a fail.

I'm guessing this...
Nathan Scalia

The post beneath this one is a lie.