Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 18, 2018, 04:15:04 AM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 02:49:21 AM 
Started by Spam - Last post by OldGuy
Thanks!

 2 
 on: Today at 01:39:43 AM 
Started by Eclipse - Last post by Holding Pattern
Yes, but when IE/Edge has a problem, I simply attribute that to it being IE/Edge.

 3 
 on: Today at 12:17:19 AM 
Started by Capmonkey - Last post by etodd
My daytime job for the last few decades has been as an aerial photographer. I shoot RAW and spend lots of time editing in LightRoom, PhotoShop and more. When I started shooting for CAP, it killed me to upload files right out of the camera without any processing. But I quickly understood that FEMA needs the data in the imagery. Its not about being 'pretty'.  How much of the school roof is still intact? Which roads are passable for first responders to gain access?  The river is still rising. How close is it to those houses now?  Thats what they are looking for.

 4 
 on: Today at 12:11:48 AM 
Started by Capmonkey - Last post by etodd
Please allow me to sidetrack a moment:

Are you currently qualified as an AP? Or just getting started? If just getting started, make sure you are using the May 2013 version of the AP Mission Task Guide (or later versions so).  Even that version is badly outdated now.

The reason I ask is that, at least for my Wing, we don't ever use RoboGeo any more. Maybe some Wings (yours?) has some clients that still like watermarked images. But CAP's major clients, especially FEMA (flooding, hurricanes, etc.) want unedited, right out of the camera jpegs, uploaded as soon as the plane lands. Using the FEMA Uploader software directly to the FEMA servers so the images immediately start showing up on the online maps FEMA personnel anywhere can view and evaluate the data in the images.


 5 
 on: Yesterday at 10:43:57 PM 
Started by francisderosa16 - Last post by CAP9907
If more Members understood the CAP IG program, they would know the answer is more than likely "no"

Yes.
I wonder if there is an IG complaint in there somewhere?

I can go to an Air Force Military Clothing Sales and pay less for an item then I would if I ordered direct from Vanguard.
And this is for the exact same item right down to the catalog number.
You seem to pay extra if you order direct from Vanguard.

 6 
 on: Yesterday at 10:11:03 PM 
Started by francisderosa16 - Last post by PHall
In the Air Force I was an enlisted aircrew member and my specified duty uniform was the Flight Suit.
Made no difference if I was flying, working in the scheduling shop or just dealing with the required Computer Based Training.

 7 
 on: Yesterday at 10:05:49 PM 
Started by francisderosa16 - Last post by PHall
Yes.
I wonder if there is an IG complaint in there somewhere?

I can go to an Air Force Military Clothing Sales and pay less for an item then I would if I ordered direct from Vanguard.
And this is for the exact same item right down to the catalog number.
You seem to pay extra if you order direct from Vanguard.

I think it's just that AAFES has a good contract with Vanguard. You're not under any kind of contract when you order direct.
And the contract CAP has with Vanguard doesn't say a thing about prices.

 8 
 on: Yesterday at 09:22:14 PM 
Started by Eclipse - Last post by Eclipse
At least one of those links you provided has comments that this is a PHP problem,
which is what it likely is, since, again, this is not only happening in Chrome,
but it is only happening on NHQ's site.


 9 
 on: Yesterday at 09:11:13 PM 
Started by francisderosa16 - Last post by CAPLTC
Yes.
I wonder if there is an IG complaint in there somewhere?

I can go to an Air Force Military Clothing Sales and pay less for an item then I would if I ordered direct from Vanguard.
And this is for the exact same item right down to the catalog number.
You seem to pay extra if you order direct from Vanguard.

 10 
 on: Yesterday at 08:34:00 PM 
Started by Eclipse - Last post by Holding Pattern
https://www.google.com/search?q=chrome+failed+to+load+pdf+document&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS781US781&oq=chrome+failed+to+l&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.4714j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45467019/failed-to-load-pdf-document-in-chrome

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chrome/qePbDBgO-7c;context-place=topicsearchin/chrome/category$3Awindows7%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:false

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chrome/zLpFop8F58A

https://github.com/dompdf/dompdf/issues/1538

If this is a server-side issue, then it is an incredibly poorly documented one.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.14 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 20 queries.
click here to email me