Uniform policy for Ranger items

[Airborne Medic]

Folks,

I'm trying to find a policy letter for the Hawk Mountain/NC Wing uniform policy concerning Ranger items.  I saw one a while back but am unable to find it.  What I'm looking for is the requirement and authorization to replace the wing patch with the Search and Rescue patch.
Thanks.

[Майор Хаткевич]

I don't know or care about it, but capmembers.com and under refs manuals etc. ICL title under 39-1.

[whatevah]

Nothing on the NCWG website... http://www.ncwg.cap.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&pageID=454

The March 2012 ICL from NHQ only authorized a tab.  Item 2-K  http://www.capmembers.com/media/cms/2012_03_12_Uniform_Manual_EDA9CCE9FE03A.pdf

[DCCDaubach]

I don't know or care about it, but capmembers.com and under refs manuals etc. ICL title under 39-1.

Ok, I hate to be the person to say this, but realll?  Are we starting to forget our Core Value of "Respect".  You may or may not care about the Ranger Tabs, however someone else might.  Can we begin showing some respect for other members?

[tsrup]

I don't know or care about it, but capmembers.com and under refs manuals etc. ICL title under 39-1.

Ok, I hate to be the person to say this, but realll?  Are we starting to forget our Core Value of "Respect".  You may or may not care about the Ranger Tabs, however someone else might.  Can we begin showing some respect for other members?

[Sapper168]

Folks,

I'm trying to find a policy letter for the Hawk Mountain/NC Wing uniform policy concerning Ranger items.  I saw one a while back but am unable to find it.  What I'm looking for is the requirement and authorization to replace the wing patch with the Search and Rescue patch.
Thanks.

The Interim Change Letter authorizes one tape to be worn directly above the tape over the left bdu pocket and the 39-1 already authorizes you to wear the activity patch, in this case i am assuming you are taking about the 'keystone' SaR patch, centered on the left BDU breast pocket

[Майор Хаткевич]

I don't know or care about it, but capmembers.com and under refs manuals etc. ICL title under 39-1.

Ok, I hate to be the person to say this, but realll?  Are we starting to forget our Core Value of "Respect".  You may or may not care about the Ranger Tabs, however someone else might.  Can we begin showing some respect for other members?

So...if I don't care or know anything about astrophysics, but can guide them to the science section in the library, I'm not respecting someone who does?

Where are you going with this again?

[Angus]

I don't know or care about it, but capmembers.com and under refs manuals etc. ICL title under 39-1.

Ok, I hate to be the person to say this, but realll?  Are we starting to forget our Core Value of "Respect".  You may or may not care about the Ranger Tabs, however someone else might.  Can we begin showing some respect for other members?

So...if I don't care or know anything about astrophysics, but can guide them to the science section in the library, I'm not respecting someone who does?

Where are you going with this again?

This is for DCC, another thing besides the above post for you to consider is that this has been discussed before so after awhile seeing some of the same stuff come up does get old.  Plus it also gets into that whole Ranger topic which seems to be the third rail of topics here on Captalk.  So the not caring can also be attributed to a feeling of "oh no, not again."

[RogueLeader]

I thought ABU's were the third rail.   I was sure that Rangers were the 7th circle of Hades.

[Angus]

I thought ABU's were the third rail.   I was sure that Rangers were the 7th circle of Hades.

Well nothing gets the vitrol going so much as Ranger Tabs.  ABU's at least there's some spirited opinions on either side. 

[cpyahoo]

Angus, don't forget berets.  The topic of berets will spin 'em up as much as Ranger strips. 

Hats and patches... too funny!