Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2017, 11:08:15 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]

 91 
 on: April 24, 2017, 11:08:38 AM 
Started by DemonOps - Last post by arajca
On your first question, the commander is responsible for responding CI, SI, SUI responses. This cannot be waived. If you were not involved, it means your sections did not have any discrepancies, so no responses were necessary.

As an Acting Commander (before dropping the Acting part), while our commander had to leave to take care of some family health issues, I had to email all the responses to the IG who had the wing commander enter them for us, since our group structure was in flux.

 92 
 on: April 24, 2017, 09:42:55 AM 
Started by etodd - Last post by stillamarine
Where in the Southeast?
If within a reasonable distance you may want to check out the military Aero Clubs.
Ones I know of:
Eglin AFB, Ga. Florida....
Redstone Army Airfield, Huntsville, Al.

Redstone Flying Activity has a 182 Retract and 2 Piper Arrows.
I think but am not positive the other locations only have Piper Arrows.
Eglin AFB does have a Cessna 310 though.

 93 
 on: April 24, 2017, 09:11:04 AM 
Started by etodd - Last post by Cliff_Chambliss
Where in the Southeast?
If within a reasonable distance you may want to check out the military Aero Clubs.
Ones I know of:
Eglin AFB, Ga.
Redstone Army Airfield, Huntsville, Al.

Redstone Flying Activity has a 182 Retract and 2 Piper Arrows.
I think but am not positive the other locations only have Piper Arrows.
Eglin AFB does have a Cessna 310 though.

 94 
 on: April 24, 2017, 08:50:42 AM 
Started by Ozzy - Last post by THRAWN
Nice! Good to see that some wings are still getting some training like this.

Truth!


Glad to see someone actually made some effort to do some multi-agency training (which should be SOP for any training event). Great job!

I really agree with this statement. CAP does not operate alone and should be doing more exercises and drills with other agencies. I've never understood the reluctance of CAP to go out and work with the greater ES community....strike that...in some cases I do understand why....sadly....

 95 
 on: April 24, 2017, 08:12:48 AM 
Started by Ozzy - Last post by LTC Don
Nice! Good to see that some wings are still getting some training like this.

Truth!


Glad to see someone actually made some effort to do some multi-agency training (which should be SOP for any training event).  Great job!

 96 
 on: April 24, 2017, 12:07:00 AM 
Started by Luis R. Ramos - Last post by Tim Medeiros
Only thing I can find for ESC is Executive Safety Course, found a reference to it in the Training Status report.

 97 
 on: April 23, 2017, 06:59:54 PM 
Started by etodd - Last post by etodd
Thanks guys. Question has been answered. I'll get my retract time needed, elsewhere.

 98 
 on: April 23, 2017, 06:36:07 PM 
Started by etodd - Last post by bd5av8r
Dang model inconsistencies. Ok so there are 4 then, N9869C that Col Ninness pointed out, N6937T that Mike identified, and also N6433T and N6420T. The only 182 is 37T, the others are 172 retracts. I ran some tail number searches on flightaware and there are no flights in SWR, but again that data is so old the aircraft could have moved plenty of times since then.

N9869C, N6433T, and N6420T are all 182RG's. N6397T is the only Turbo 182RG.
We had a retract in Charleston in 2012


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 99 
 on: April 23, 2017, 04:09:29 PM 
Started by etodd - Last post by Nor'easter
Dang model inconsistencies. Ok so there are 4 then, N9869C that Col Ninness pointed out, N6937T that Mike identified, and also N6433T and N6420T. The only 182 is 37T, the others are 172 retracts. I ran some tail number searches on flightaware and there are no flights in SWR, but again that data is so old the aircraft could have moved plenty of times since then.

N9869C, N6433T, and N6420T are all 182RG's. N6397T is the only Turbo 182RG.

 100 
 on: April 23, 2017, 03:59:15 PM 
Started by DemonOps - Last post by DemonOps
Question One:  Our unit (group hq) just completed our SUI, last month.  I was not involved with the coordinating of unit responses to, CI, SI OR SUI.  Is there a way around this?  Can the group commander, who actually did all of the coordinations, waive this requirement?

Question Two corresponds with the one before it, which is:  "...Explain to the OJT supervisor or commander how this function interacts with the same function at higher and lower echelons. Explain how you have complied..."

Have I overlooked a regulation that pertains to this?

Not anyone's problem or concern, but it's important that I complete the requirements for the Senior Rating for the Administration Officer. 

Because of the advancement of my Multiple Sclerosis, I believe I'm running out of time. 

I've been a member since 1974 (with a six year absence due to military service).  It would be a tremendous accomplishment if I could just leave with a senior rating (doesn't mean automatic advancement to Major, but can't see anything that could preclude this, especially since it would be awarded at the time of my retirement).

Not to make this into a "Hallmark Moment" but CAPTalk has been the most reputable and helpful unofficial blog on the internet.  One by one, I've left other CAP blogs because they were comprised of malcontents, bomb throwers, and simple complainers.  CAPTalk suffers no fools, which is good.  Captains need to know how to look stuff up without having their hands held, and the fact that there are dozens of Lt. Colonels and a few former national commanders on this blog, helps to keep everything running "somewhat" smoothly.

If anyone is attending the Michigan Wing's Conference up in Traverse City next weekend, I hope you look me up.  I also, for the first time in thirty years, will be attending the evening banquet, since it will be my last (just wish I could bring my lovely wife, Linda). 

DAVID J. D'ARCY, Capt, CAP (123070)
Group 703 Administration Officer

[edited for formatting]

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.13 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.134 seconds with 15 queries.