Main Menu

ABU vs BBDU

Started by JK657, December 15, 2013, 08:21:57 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What do you consider more important? Assume that all height/weight grooming standards are still in effect

Having the same field uniform as Air Force (such as ABU)
28 (44.4%)
Having all members in the same field uniform (such as BBDU)
35 (55.6%)

Total Members Voted: 62

Майор Хаткевич

More like biological clothing.

LSThiker

Quote from: SarDragon on December 17, 2013, 11:45:54 PM
YGBSM! Functional to work in, maybe, until you have to take a potty break. Then they become a bigger fail than USN 13-button trousers.

Just say no.

No different than a standard flight uniform or the Army's tanker overalls. 

Eclipse

Or flight suits.  I think some of our members still wear those once and awhile.

The first season year they can be jumpsuits, then re-imagined to be two-piece uniforms, and then leave the jumpsuits for
the enlisted and cadets.

"That Others May Zoom"

Panache

Ah, I see they finished taking pictures for the new 39-1....


LSThiker

In all honesty, I like the Star Trek Federation uniforms.  They are streamlined, sterile, basic, and free of other junk.  They only contain three things:  comm badge, rank, and job category (science/medical, engineering/operations, or command).  Everyone looks the same.  Even the dress uniform is sterile and basic (TNG and above).  I would love if the military and CAP went to these style of uniforms.

NIN

Quote from: Panache on December 18, 2013, 07:39:41 PM
Ah, I see they finished taking pictures for the new 39-1....



But does he have a satchel?
Darin Ninness, Col, CAP
I have no responsibilities whatsoever
I like to have Difficult Adult Conversations™
The contents of this post are Copyright © 2007-2024 by NIN. All rights are reserved. Specific permission is given to quote this post here on CAP-Talk only.

ol'fido

Quote from: NIN on December 18, 2013, 08:30:22 PM
Quote from: Panache on December 18, 2013, 07:39:41 PM
Ah, I see they finished taking pictures for the new 39-1....



But does he have a satchel?
Not even the Enterprise wants to go there, boldly or otherwise. :P
Lt. Col. Randy L. Mitchell
Historian, Group 1, IL-006