India puts nuclear plants on alert: AMERICA WAKE UP

Started by wingnut55, November 17, 2009, 08:29:30 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wingnut55

U.S. authorities arrested David Headley, a U.S. citizen, on October 3 on charges of hatching a plot to attack a Danish newspaper whose cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed led to deadly protests by Muslims.

New Delhi has asked to interview Headley over possible plans to attack Indian targets and are investigating various visits to the country.

The U.S. government said Headley also traveled to Pakistan where he met a leader of a group with ties to al Qaeda, Harakat-ul Jihad Islami, and communicated with members of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to the U.S. government.

HOME GROWN THREAT:

Should CAP NHQ take CHARGE and formulate a CAP National Response to Nuclear Terrorism?? or just sit back let the WINGS struggle one by one??

Gunner C

#1
Honestly, I think this one would be out of our league.  But on a purely logical note, do you really think anyone can actually destroy/disable a nuke plant or cause a nuclear accident/incident?

The containment facilities have metal rebar in them larger than your arm.  The concrete is exceedingly hard and several feet thick.  They are basically impregnable.  If you're thinking about an aircraft breaching the concrete, forget it.  A fully loaded 757 that hit the Pentagon (a masonry building), didn't penetrate the outer ring.  The rest of a nuclear power plant is just, well, a power plant pretty much like any other with turbines, generators, and a handling yard.

Even if someone could breach one of these buildings, you don't want to be down wind from it without the proper equipment and decon capabilities. I don't see CAP pilots or observers flying in MOPP 4 with cadets scrubbing down the local Cessna 182.

ANY national response that is believable has to be part of a multi-agency plan supporting an overarching plan (The National Response Plan).  Sorry, but we're not part of it, except as invited by 1st AF.

sparks

Absolutely, Nuclear reactors can't be breached by terrorist using commercial aircraft. Predicting such an event may make for spectacular headlines on FOX but it isn't a realistic probability.

Although some CAP units have been trained in radiation monitoring we haven't been equipped to perform the mission. The equipment I was trained to use was ancient Civil Defense radiation monitors from the 50's. No equipment for the aircraft so I wonder how that would have worked out. It would take days to decontaminate a 172 or 182 since every cylinder fin would be a potential trap fro "hot" particles, oh boy.

Today the best equipment we can use is a good digital camera with GPS for monitoring infrastructure

Flying Pig

#3
The Department of Energy and local law enforcement would be the handle.  I dont see CAP getting this gig or even being prepared to handle it.  I go through WMD Training every year through work and its a joke, let alone setting up volunteers to do it.  Last I checked, we dont have MOPP suits and I havnt been checked out to fly in a gas mask.  Sorry, there are some things where my "volunteer" status ends and I say leave it to the paid guys.

Pylon

Quote from: wingnut55 on November 17, 2009, 08:29:30 AM
U.S. authorities arrested David Headley, a U.S. citizen, on October 3 on charges of hatching a plot to attack a Danish newspaper whose cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed led to deadly protests by Muslims.

New Delhi has asked to interview Headley over possible plans to attack Indian targets and are investigating various visits to the country.

The U.S. government said Headley also traveled to Pakistan where he met a leader of a group with ties to al Qaeda, Harakat-ul Jihad Islami, and communicated with members of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to the U.S. government.

HOME GROWN THREAT:

Should CAP NHQ take CHARGE and formulate a CAP National Response to Nuclear Terrorism?? or just sit back let the WINGS struggle one by one??

A)  What does the article you posted have to do with nuclear terrorism?

B)  CAP doesn't have the ability to "take CHARGE" in matters of national security, law enforcement or the security of other people's facilities. 

C)  I don't understand what the "WINGS struggle" with in regards to this intensely complex perceived threat.  Have any CAP Wings officially identified needs for support from NHQ in meeting the needs of real customers that have come forward for CAP's services?
Michael F. Kieloch, Maj, CAP

Fuzzy

Am I the only one who utterly detests the phrase "America wake up!!!!".

Besides this guy is just a troll or something.
C/Capt Semko

Rotorhead

Quote from: wingnut55 on November 17, 2009, 08:29:30 AM
U.S. authorities arrested David Headley, a U.S. citizen, on October 3 on charges of hatching a plot to attack a Danish newspaper whose cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed led to deadly protests by Muslims.

New Delhi has asked to interview Headley over possible plans to attack Indian targets and are investigating various visits to the country.

The U.S. government said Headley also traveled to Pakistan where he met a leader of a group with ties to al Qaeda, Harakat-ul Jihad Islami, and communicated with members of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to the U.S. government.

HOME GROWN THREAT:

Should CAP NHQ take CHARGE and formulate a CAP National Response to Nuclear Terrorism?? or just sit back let the WINGS struggle one by one??

Given the fact that a substantial portion of our membership can't be bothered with getting the current basic FEMA qualifications done, I don't think we're in any position to deal with a challenge like this, nor will we be.
Capt. Scott Orr, CAP
Deputy Commander/Cadets
Prescott Composite Sqdn. 206
Prescott, AZ

NCRblues

We actually have a working agreement with the state and county to help out in case of an emergency (any emergency not just terror) with our reactor in Callaway county. Our deal is to help set up and run the emergency relief center that the state will take those that need to be evacuated from their homes. We have been told point blank we won't go anywhere near the power plant, no matter what.
In god we trust, all others we run through NCIC

wuzafuzz

Quote from: NCRblues on November 18, 2009, 11:59:52 AM
We actually have a working agreement with the state and county to help out in case of an emergency (any emergency not just terror) with our reactor in Callaway county. Our deal is to help set up and run the emergency relief center that the state will take those that need to be evacuated from their homes. We have been told point blank we won't go anywhere near the power plant, no matter what.
Sounds appropriate to me.  A good community service without delusions of grandeur. 
"You can't stop the signal, Mal."

JayT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueEl7A7KaHA

13:33! America's Civil Air Patrol stands ready to response to an H-Bomb attack!
"Eagerness and thrill seeking in others' misery is psychologically corrosive, and is also rampant in EMS. It's a natural danger of the job. It will be something to keep under control, something to fight against."

flyerthom

TC

O-Rex

Has anyone noticed that Radiological Monitor has disappeared from the new 60-3??

Flying Pig

^Does CAP even do the training anymore?  Id be interested in it just out of...well, interest.

RiverAux

Quote from: wingnut55 on November 17, 2009, 08:29:30 AM
Should CAP NHQ take CHARGE and formulate a CAP National Response to Nuclear Terrorism?? or just sit back let the WINGS struggle one by one??
Other than the idea that DNALL (I think -- where has he been anyway?) used to promote of getting radiation detectors installed on our aircraft for potentially identifying possibly illegal radioactive sources (not for responding to incidents like the plan was in the old days), I'm not really sure what we can do in this arena. 

If there is some sort of dirty bomb or real bomb, about all we can do is some of our typical missions of transporting very small amounts of supplies or personnel or perhaps providing general assistance at shelters and the like.   Possibly aerial monitoring of evacuation routes.  Basically the same sort of thing we might do in response to a hurricane. 

But the general point that NHQ doesn't have much of a plan for responding to large scale disaster missions is a good one.  With the apparent demise of the C4s, I expect we'll be going back to improvising on the fly.

RADIOMAN015

Quote from: wingnut55 on November 17, 2009, 08:29:30 AM

Should CAP NHQ take CHARGE and formulate a CAP National Response to Nuclear Terrorism?? or just sit back let the WINGS struggle one by one??

Well it is possible that CAP could be tasked to provide some local transportation to the Nuclear Emergency Support Teams http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/FactSheets/NEST.pdf and maybe (although a very slim possiblitly IMHO)  even carry some detection sensors. 

BUT we have to remember that just about every state now has military national guard teams (WMD-CST) http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/wmd-cst.htm     So there's is a committed "known" response capability.  In CAP we really don't know what someones' availability is until we make the alert call.
RM


BlackKnight

Quote from: sparks on November 17, 2009, 01:02:19 PM
Absolutely, Nuclear reactors can't be breached by terrorist using commercial aircraft. Predicting such an event may make for spectacular headlines on FOX but it isn't a realistic probability.

In my day job I'm a nuclear safety analysis engineer. I construct computer models of nuclear plants and run accident scenarios on them to see if the designs pass muster. In the interest of engineering accuracy I would like to state that US commercial nuclear containments are NOT designed to withstand direct impact from a commercial airliner or similar large aircraft. To my knowledge that scenario has never been in our design standards.  The newest European reactors are designed to withstand impact from military jet fighters.  Whether the new generation of US plant containments will be required to withstand large aircraft impact with no significant damage is still being evaluated by the NRC.  But they probably won't be.  We supposedly have a better Air Force than Europe does.  :)

Would a nuclear accident with significant radiation release occur if a 747 was crashed into a US nuclear containment building?  Very unlikely.  The containment might suffer several thru-wall cracks and lose pressure integrity, but the aircraft would be obliterated like a bug on a windshield. The reactor probably wouldn't even trip until the fireball affected the adjacent turbine building and caused the unit to separate from the main electrical grid.  There would of course be long term issues associated with massive damage to the surrounding site (debris, power lines and pipes broken, offices damaged, workers injured or killed) but the reactor and nuclear core would be mostly unaffected and a normal shutdown would be executed.  There are additional rings of reinforced steel and concrete around the reactor and coolant pipes inside the containment. The containment is just the first of several layers of structural defense.

If one were a terrorist there are much easier targets to hit than a nuclear plant.  You'd have to be truly ignorant of basic physics (and manned 50-cal machine gun platforms) to try to go after one of these facilities without the aid of heavy duty military hardware.
Phil Boylan, Maj, CAP
DCS, Rome Composite Sqdn - GA043
http://www.romecap.org/

Flying Pig

BlackKinight, very interesting.  I am always amazed at what some people do for a living.  My dad used to work at San Onofre as one of the grunts who put the refueling rods down into the reactors.  (Or something like that).

Ive had the opportunity to train with some of the SRT units from various Nuclear Power Plants.  All on the east coast. Pretty much all of them are contracted through Wackenhut Security Services.  They arent military and have no LE authority.  But they pack a punch that most cops cant even dream of.
Very good teams with the ability to handle almost anything.  Aside from Close Air Support and Naval guns, they bring pretty much everything to the fight that an Infantry Company would have, if not more.  A couple even have their own aviation units.
Having worked with NEST, I don't really see a time when they would be transported by CAP.  The two times I worked with them, once they came in 18 wheelers with so much gear it would take a fleet of C-206s to carry them and the second time they came in 4 CH-47's. ( and landed at an undisclosed location  ;D)  If NEST ever gets called for real, the government wont be have an issue transporting them.

Disclaimer:
Before anyone falls out of their chairs over OPSEC all of their weapons and capabilities can be found online.

wingnut55

We spend a trillion dollars on US Government TSA luggage inspectors and yet we Hire private security for a plant that if compromised or blown could result in the evacuation of 10 million people from an area for 100 years or more. Possibly 100,000 dead and sick.

I am sure Wakenhut  and other Mall Guard organizations get INTEL directly from the FBI
Sounds like the problems identified years before 9-11 are not fixed. Our biggest enemy is ourselves and the threats from within our own border.


Al Sayre

I am also an Engineer at a nuclear plant in my day job, and can echo the the statements of BlackKnight and Flying Pig.  Our Security was recently moved from Wackenhut to in-house, but I don't think who writes their checks is what matters.  It's the people who are dedicated to the protection of the facility, and from what I've seen, they're pretty good at it.  Ours just passed a month of Force on Force testing and came away with very high honors from the NRC.
Lt Col Al Sayre
MS Wing Staff Dude
Admiral, Great Navy of the State of Nebraska
GRW #2787

JayT

Quote from: wingnut55 on January 06, 2010, 07:51:03 AM
We spend a trillion dollars on US Government TSA luggage inspectors and yet we Hire private security for a plant that if compromised or blown could result in the evacuation of 10 million people from an area for 100 years or more. Possibly 100,000 dead and sick.

I am sure Wakenhut  and other Mall Guard organizations get INTEL directly from the FBI
Sounds like the problems identified years before 9-11 are not fixed. Our biggest enemy is ourselves and the threats from within our own border.

Yeah, because the TSA is the very model of an excellent government organization....I mean, they're practically the Special Frces of aviation security.



"Eagerness and thrill seeking in others' misery is psychologically corrosive, and is also rampant in EMS. It's a natural danger of the job. It will be something to keep under control, something to fight against."