Laser designators would be cool if we had cas to rely on.
I want my x-wing.
Quote from: RogueLeader on April 03, 2012, 06:13:00 PM
I want my x-wing.
A-wings are better, but I'd take a TIE defender over everything.
Quote from: Extremepredjudice on April 03, 2012, 06:17:48 PM
Quote from: RogueLeader on April 03, 2012, 06:13:00 PM
I want my x-wing.
A-wings are better, but I'd take a TIE defender over everything.
I'd debate the a-wing. The TIE Defender, agree with, I will.
Quote from: RogueLeader on April 03, 2012, 06:22:08 PM
Quote from: Extremepredjudice on April 03, 2012, 06:17:48 PM
Quote from: RogueLeader on April 03, 2012, 06:13:00 PM
I want my x-wing.
A-wings are better, but I'd take a TIE defender over everything.
I'd debate the a-wing. The TIE Defender, agree with, I will.
Faster, more manueverable, better shield, better weapons, and weapons that can rotate vertically. I think the A-wing wins. The A-wing was designed to replace the X-wing. The B-wing to replace the Y-wing.
And of course the E-wing that was supposed to match the X-wing, but have updated features.
A stealth-X might be able to take an A-wing. Other than that, no.
The Y-wing or Imperial Shuttle is probably better for SAR work - flight speeds are slower and they have longer range. Plus the A-wing and most TIEs are single man fighters.
In the CAP world, I think we have all the tech we need. I'd like everyone to have a $500 squadron camera because one the airplane is in place 90% of great pictures is about the camera, but it's impractical. I'd like us to have a half dozen airplanes on the ramp so that a squadron really could put up five or six airplanes at a time, but that also isn't practical.