COMMS CALLSIGNS???

Started by jheaney1108, July 30, 2007, 08:38:54 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jheaney1108

who here has a commms call sign cause im the ncoic of communications in my squadron

drcomm

Not sure exactly what you are asking for.
David Romere, Maj, CAP
Starbase Composite Squadron, SWR-OK-151
Oil Well 767
Mitchell Award #2536 (May 1981)
Amateur Radio Call Sign: KA5OWI

wacapgh

CAP Callsigns are generally assigned by your Wing Communications Director or designee (Licencing Officer, Group Communications Officers, etc).

JC004

Quote from: wacapgh on July 30, 2007, 11:49:26 PM
CAP Callsigns are generally assigned by your Wing Communications Director or designee (Licencing Officer, Group Communications Officers, etc).

But I didn't like mine, so I changed the numbers around.   >:D

CASH172

There is a list of call signs that wings, regions, and national uses through NTC  somewhere.  It won't give exact call signs but just the stuff like which wing uses a specific sign.  I'd like to give an example but it's a little against OPSEC. 

JC004

Quote from: CASH172 on July 31, 2007, 12:22:37 AM
There is a list of call signs that wings, regions, and national uses through E-services somewhere.  It won't give exact call signs but just the stuff like which wing uses a specific sign.  I'd like to give an example but it's a little against OPSEC. 

My favorite call sign is [BEEEEEEEEP - OPSEC].  Grrr.  The alternate one that NHQ uses.   >:D

floridacyclist

If I read your request right, you are new in the comms world and are looking for others on common ground....right or wrong?

My whole family has callsigns because you have to have a radio assigned (or owned) and families are considered to share equipment. I'm not so sure about the opsec part because you can look our callsigns up on the FL Wing website, but in the interest of not getting into a head-butting contest I won't mention it here. Let's just say that my family has 5 almost consecutive callsigns in our series

We're also all hams too and the calls are:
AI4KK:Gene (that's me)
KI4JOL:Bonnie (my wife)
KI4JTA:C/MSgt Stefan Floyd (18)
KI4NGO:C/MSgt Joshua Floyd (15)
KI4WET:C/SMSgt Tony Davidson (16)
C/Amn Chris Davidson(12) is still working on his ham license and ACUT
Gene Floyd, Capt CAP
Wearer of many hats, master of none (but senior-rated in two)
www.tallahasseecap.org
www.rideforfatherhood.org

BlackKnight

I think what he's asking for is where to find the cross-reference of tactical or duty-position call signs that used to be standardized.  For example, the old 3-number codes following the wing call sign were based on group, squadron number, and duty position.  You didn't necessarily have a "personalized" call sign unless comm was your specialty. The average user assumed the appropriate call sign based on their tactical duty position during the comm session. 

Phil Boylan, Maj, CAP
DCS, Rome Composite Sqdn - GA043
http://www.romecap.org/

BillB

Hey does that mean I can be HeadCAP 01 ??
Gil Robb Wilson # 19
Gil Robb Wilson # 104

arajca

Quote from: BlackKnight on July 31, 2007, 02:43:49 PM
I think what he's asking for is where to find the cross-reference of tactical or duty-position call signs that used to be standardized.  For example, the old 3-number codes following the wing call sign were based on group, squadron number, and duty position.  You didn't necessarily have a "personalized" call sign unless comm was your specialty. The average user assumed the appropriate call sign based on their tactical duty position during the comm session. 
That may have been your wing's system, but it is/was not the same everywhere.

BlackKnight

There is reference to such a tactical call sign system in CAPR 100-1 Volume III (E), Section 2-3.  The details of how to apply it for echelons below wing staff are omitted. But the concept is presented and could be easily adapted.
Phil Boylan, Maj, CAP
DCS, Rome Composite Sqdn - GA043
http://www.romecap.org/

SarDragon

Quote from: BlackKnight on July 31, 2007, 05:21:58 PM
There is reference to such a tactical call sign system in CAPR 100-1 Volume III (E), Section 2-3.  The details of how to apply it for echelons below wing staff are omitted. But the concept is presented and could be easily adapted.

CAPR 100-1 Volume III (E) has been superceded by CAPR 100-3 as of 3 Nov 2006.
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
50 Year Member
Mitchell Award (unnumbered)
C/WO, CAP, Ret

JC004


shorning

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly we can blow a simple question out of proportion... :-\

BlackKnight

Quote from: SarDragon on July 31, 2007, 10:11:19 PM
[CAPR 100-1 Volume III (E) has been superceded by CAPR 100-3 as of 3 Nov 2006.

Okay, be that way.   :) 
The same info can be found in the current version of CAPR 100-1 Vol 1, Section 7-15.
Phil Boylan, Maj, CAP
DCS, Rome Composite Sqdn - GA043
http://www.romecap.org/

Pylon

Quote from: jheaney1108 on July 30, 2007, 08:38:54 PM
who here has a commms call sign cause im the ncoic of communications in my squadron

I have a HAM callsign.  NY Wing never issued me a call sign, even though I've had my ROP-A for years, applied for one back in the day when having a personal, CAP-capable radio could qualify you for a call-sign, and even though I held positions in squadron and Group staff.

Know what I used?   I used "Hey, Comm Guy!  Where's the XXXXXX at?"   ;)
Michael F. Kieloch, Maj, CAP

JC004


Camas

Quote from: floridacyclist on July 31, 2007, 01:05:21 PM
- - - -  because you have to have a radio assigned (or owned) - - - -

Maybe I've missed something but do you have to have a radio?  I've seen nothing in CAPM 100-1 Vol 1.

JC004

Quote from: Camas on August 03, 2007, 04:39:30 AM
Quote from: floridacyclist on July 31, 2007, 01:05:21 PM
- - - -  because you have to have a radio assigned (or owned) - - - -

Maybe I've missed something but do you have to have a radio?  I've seen nothing in CAPM 100-1 Vol 1.

well currently the call sign is assigned to the radio...

Galahad

Quote from: Camas on August 03, 2007, 04:39:30 AM
Maybe I've missed something but do you have to have a radio?  I've seen nothing in CAPM 100-1 Vol 1.

Precisely!  This is apparently another one of those deals where unpublished 'policy' is introducing chaos.  It caught my unit completely flat-footed. We're still training based on existing regulations in this regard because no revisions have been published.  It appears that someone unilaterally decided to change call-sign and licensing policy but they apparently did it back-door without membership peer review and didn't bother to update the regs.  It's like dealing with the IRS.  You're wrong because they say so.