Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 25, 2018, 06:44:02 PM
Home Help Login Register
News:

CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 04:24:13 PM 
Started by Anderson#3 - Last post by jeders
Are you sure about that?  Because supplements and OIs at every other level expire when a Commander is replaced,
have to be re-submitted for approval by the new CC, and are unenforceable until the new version has been properly approved.



Citation Please

I already acknowledged that I didn't know if this was a regulatory mandate...

I don't know that the regs even speak to that issue directly, but that is certainly SOP for the organisation.

However is is absolutely SOP - we've had the issue very recently.  NHQ indicating that none of
our sups or even local forms can be used, mandated, or enforced until the new Wing CC signs off on them,
even if they are unchanged.

This has been the case since I've been in.

I certainly believe that's how it used to be (that's how I remember it), but it seems that that has changed. Now supps/OIs need to be re-certified annually; re-certifying upon change of command is only suggested.

Quote from: CAPR 1-2
8.3.4. Supplement and Operating Instruction Certification. In the anniversary month of each supplement or OI, the administrative officer of the unit that issued the publication (CAP/DA for NHQ OIs) will ensure the OPR certifies the publication is still current and essential. Administrative officers will inform CAP/DA of the certifierís name and the date the certification was made. CAP/DA will reflect the certification date on the CAP publications website. Commanders are encouraged to review unit supplements and OIs, and direct their re-certification upon assuming command.

 2 
 on: Today at 03:44:16 PM 
Started by DocJekyll - Last post by wacapgh
SAR/DR Mission Pilot does not require Mission Observer as a prerequisite, only Mission Scanner.

 3 
 on: Today at 03:28:57 PM 
Started by Anderson#3 - Last post by Eclipse
Quote from: Eclipse link[quot=topic=23377.msg419023#msg419023 date=1537842325
Are you sure about that?  Because supplements and OIs at every other level expire when a Commander is replaced,
have to be re-submitted for approval by the new CC, and are unenforceable until the new version has been properly approved.



Citation Please

I already acknowledged that I didn't know if this was a regulatory mandate...

I don't know that the regs even speak to that issue directly, but that is certainly SOP for the organisation.

However is is absolutely SOP - we've had the issue very recently.  NHQ indicating that none of
our sups or even local forms can be used, mandated, or enforced until the new Wing CC signs off on them,
even if they are unchanged.

This has been the case since I've been in.

 4 
 on: Today at 02:59:42 PM 
Started by I_Am_Twigs - Last post by uncrisppotato
I've had several throughout the years but some of the main ones that stand out are : Eggroll, Uncle Sergeant, Reversal, Jolly, and most recently Lost and Hungry. Good times.

 5 
 on: Today at 02:30:24 PM 
Started by Anderson#3 - Last post by Lord of the North
Quote from: Eclipse link[quot=topic=23377.msg419023#msg419023 date=1537842325
Are you sure about that?  Because supplements and OIs at every other level expire when a Commander is replaced,
have to be re-submitted for approval by the new CC, and are unenforceable until the new version has been properly approved.



Citation Please

 6 
 on: Today at 12:13:05 PM 
Started by Anderson#3 - Last post by Eclipse
So who wants to volunteer to tell everyone they can't wear ABUs?

I think we already did...

 7 
 on: Today at 11:47:44 AM 
Started by Anderson#3 - Last post by TheSkyHornet
So who wants to volunteer to tell everyone they can't wear ABUs?

Anyone? Anyone?! Come on, people! Volunteer organization! I should see hands going up!

 8 
 on: Today at 11:42:40 AM 
Started by UWONGO2 - Last post by TheSkyHornet
Always a motivator is receiving a cert that has creases and bends in it from being shuffled around
from hand-to-hand (though now that most aren't printed by NHQ anymore, less of an issue,
or even better, has stains on it.

So pulling the certificate out of your pocket is a no-no?

2 folds, along the center line is the max allowed by regulation.  BBQ sauce fingerprints are
"not for verification purposes"...

BBQ sauce is ALWAYS welcome! YOU HEAR ME?!?!  >:(

ALWAYS.....




 9 
 on: Today at 11:38:50 AM 
Started by DocJekyll - Last post by Eclipse
They look pretty good to me, my only comments...

Typo on the "Common Examine Issues" slide "students" should be "students' " (possessive plural), or at least "student's" (possessive).


 10 
 on: Today at 11:33:50 AM 
Started by WedSea040 - Last post by WedSea040
Thank you for the info.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
CAP Talk  |  Recent Posts


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP SMF 2.0.14 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 15 queries.