New picture on www.cap.gov

[SJFedor]

I just noticed that as well. I guess someone at National was reading one of the posts on here or another place about how the door decal was wrong.

[SarDragon]

Nice 'Shop job!

[jeders]

Indeed. Makes you wonder what else they're photoshopping out over there 

[mdickinson]

It certainly is a sharp looking picture!

But it leaves me wondering: why would we want to publicize a photo of a CAP aircraft flying less than 2000 feet AGL above a National Park? Does CAP want visitors to the site to think that our pilots consider themselves exempt from the 2000 foot rule?

[SarDragon]

Maybe someone asked for a waiver for the photo op?

[mikeylikey]

Indeed. Makes you wonder what else they're photoshopping out over there 

Everything!  (they should find a way to photoshop fat away, I would love that!)

[mdickinson]

Maybe someone asked for a waiver for the photo op?

It's a guideline, not an FAR, so there would be no waiver needed. Just seems like a poor precedent to set.

[pixelwonk]

Nice 'Shop job!

meh. not really.

[Al Sayre]

^^ Is that modesty?

[SarDragon]

Probably not. I left out the sarcasm smiley, but I know that's actually a pretty easy change. Might take me ten minutes, but Tedda might take half that time.

[pixelwonk]

I shall serve no wine before it's time.

[Psicorp]

Looks wise - yes. Operationally - no. Makes preflights harder.

And they block some of the Observer / Scanner's view.

[thp]

New pic ++++

[carbheat]

Can u say "Powerpoint?"

[Pylon]

Can u say "Powerpoint?"

What?   

[carbheat]

D'oh!  (_8(|)

Oops - I meant "photoshop" not "powerpoint". 

moot point - I saw the "new pic"  reply and somehow missed the previous photoshop replies.

[Pylon]

Thanks SarDragon