Med question!

[RiverAux]

At such time that NHQ feels it is important enough they speak to it in a regulatory way,

See the NB agenda.

[Eclipse]

At such time that NHQ feels it is important enough they speak to it in a regulatory way,

See the NB agenda.

Is this issue being considered?  I didn't realize that...

[DC]

See Agenda Item 6, page 19.

[Eclipse]

See Agenda Item 6, page 19.

Do you guys actually read the whole threads?  Ned's been telling us its under review the whole time.

[RADIOMAN015]

After reading this thread a mighty salute to those senior members that volunteer to staff these cadet encampments.   However, I can see why most senior members have no interest in participating in cadet encampments

Although there seems to be some legal ramifications in what is currently being done or not done, in the end isn't it the senior member encampment staffs' moral responsibility to insure that Cadet Joe & Cadet Mary return home no worse than when they got to the encampment

Good luck on this one  --- You all will need it! :redx:
RM

[arajca]

See Agenda Item 6, page 19.

Do you guys actually read the whole threads?  Ned's been telling us its under review the whole time.

Just like the HSO track that has been under review for several years now? Until today, the NB minutes were not generally available to show that this issue is nearing resolution.